uwf UmweltWirtschaftsForum

, Volume 25, Issue 1–2, pp 15–23 | Cite as

Conceptualizing sustainability from a consumer perspective

A qualitative study in the food sector
  • Tom Joerß
  • Payam Akbar
  • Robert Mai
  • Stefan Hoffmann
Originalbeitrag / Original Article

Abstract

This qualitative study explores consumers’ understanding of sustainability in the food sector. The paper identifies different mental structures of the concept (nominal, ordinal, cluster, hierarchy) and taps into the underlying motivation and goals driving evaluations of sustainability.

Diese qualitative Studie untersucht das Verständnis der Verbraucher für Nachhaltigkeit im Lebensmittelbereich. Der Artikel identifiziert verschiedene mentale Strukturen, wie das Konzept verankert ist (nominal, ordinal, Cluster, hierarchisch) und beleuchtet die zugrundeliegenden Motive und Ziele, welche die Bewertungen der Nachhaltigkeit bestimmen.

Keywords

Sustainability Sustainable Consumption Corporate Social Responsibility Qualitative Interviews Values 

Konzeptionalisierung der Nachhaltigkeit aus der Konsumentensicht

Eine qualitative Studie im Lebensmittelsektor

Schlüsselwörter

Nachhaltigkeit Nachhaltiger Konsum Corporate Social Responsibility Qualitative Interviews Werte 

References

  1. Aguinis H, Glavas A (2012) What we know and don’t know about corporate social responsibility: a review and research agenda. J Manage 38(4):932–968Google Scholar
  2. Arsil P, Li E, Bruwer J, Lyons G (2014) Exploring consumer motivations towards buying local fresh food products: a means-end chain approach. Br Food J 116(10):1533–1549CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Axjonow A, Ernstberger J, Pott C (2016) Auswirkungen der CSR-Berichterstattung auf die Unternehmensreputation. uwf 24(2–3):215–221CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Burlingame B, Dernini S (2012) Sustainable diets and biodiversity: directions and solutions for policy, research and action. International scientific symposium, biodiversity and sustainable diets united against hunger, FAO Headquarters, Rome, 3–5 November 2010.Google Scholar
  5. Cheng B, Ioannou I, Serafeim G (2014) Corporate social responsibility and access to finance. Strateg Manag J 35(1):1–23CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Cominetti M, Seele P (2016) Hard soft law or soft hard law? A content analysis of CSR guidelines typologized along hybrid legal status. uwf 24(2–3):127–140CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Costanigro M, McCluskey JJ, Goemans C (2010) The economics of nested names: name specificity, reputations, and price premia. Am J Agric Econ 92(5):1339–1350CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Davidson MD (2013) On the relation between ecosystem services, intrinsic value, existence value and economic valuation. Ecol Econ 95:171–177CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Deselnicu OC, Costanigro M, Souza-Monteiro DM, McFadden DT (2013) A meta-analysis of geographical indication food valuation studies: What drives the premium for origin-based labels? J Agric Resour Econ 38(2):204–219Google Scholar
  10. Di Giuli A, Kostovetsky L (2014) Are red or blue companies more likely to go green? Politics and corporate social responsibility. J Financ Econ 111(1):158–180CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Duchin F (2005) Sustainable consumption of food: a framework for analyzing scenarios about changes in diets. J Ind Ecol 9(1–2):99–114Google Scholar
  12. Gold S, Hahn R, Seuring S (2013) Sustainable supply chain management in “Base of the Pyramid” food projects – a path to triple bottom line approaches for multinationals? Int Bus Rev 22:784–799CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Gonzalez-Rodriguez MR, Diaz-Fernandez MC, Simonetti B (2015) The social, economic and environmental dimensions of corporate social responsibility: the role played by consumers and potential entrepreneurs. Int Bus Rev 24(5):836–848CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Gutman J (1982) A means-end chain model based on consumer categorization processes. J Mark 46(2):60–72CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Iyer G, Soberman DA (2016) Social responsibility and product innovation. Mark Sci 35(5):727–742CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Johansson JK, Douglas SP, Nonaka I (1985) Assessing the impact of country of origin on product evaluations: a new methodological perspective. J Mark Res 22(4):388–396CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Korschun D, Bhattacharya CB, Swain SD (2014) Corporate social responsibility, customer orientation, and the job performance of frontline employees. J Mark 78(3):20–37CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Kortenkamp K, Moore C (2001) Ecocentrism and anthropocentrism: moral reasoning about ecological commons dilemmas. J Environ Psychol 21:261–272CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Kuckartz U (2014) Qualitative Inhaltsanalyse. Methoden, Praxis, Computerunterstützung, 2nd edn. Beltz Juventa, WeinheimGoogle Scholar
  20. Kühling J (2014) Nachhaltiger Konsum und individuelle Konsumwahl: Eine Analyse umweltfreundlichen Konsumverhaltens. Metropolis, MarburgGoogle Scholar
  21. Lee JK, Lee BK, Lee WN (2013) Country-of-origin fit’s effect on consumer product evaluation in cross-border strategic brand alliance. J Bus Res 66(3):354–363CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Lins KV, Servaes H, Tamayo A (2017) Social capital, trust, and firm performance: the value of corporate social responsibility during the financial crisis. J Finance. doi:10.1111/jofi.12505 Google Scholar
  23. Mishra S, Modi SB (2016) Corporate social responsibility and shareholder wealth: the role of marketing capability. J Mark 80(1):26–46CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Neßler C, Lis B (2015) Das Ökonomische Prinzip und Unternehmensverantwortung: Corporate Social Responsibility als Marktkraft. uwf 23(4):145–151CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Otto Group (2013) Lebensqualität. Konsumethik zwischen persönlichem Vorteil und sozialer Verantwortung (Otto Group Trendstudie 2013, 4. Studie zum ethischen Konsum)Google Scholar
  26. Revell BJ (2015) One man’s meat… 2050? Ruminations on future meat demand in the context of global warming. J Agric Econ 66(3):573–614CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Rokeach M (1973) The nature of human values. Free Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  28. Schrempf-Stirling J, Palazzo G, Phillips RA (2016) Historic corporate social responsibility. Acad Manage Rev 41(4):700–719CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Schwartz SH (1977) Normative influence on altruism. In: Berkowitz L (ed) Advances in experimental social psychology, vol 10. Academic Press, New York, pp 221–279Google Scholar
  30. Soyez K, Hoffmann S, Wünschmann S, Gelbrich K (2009) Pro-environmental value orientation across cultures. Development of a German and Russian scale. Soc Psychol 40(4):222–233CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Spiggle S (1994) Analysis and interpretation of qualitative data in consumer research. J Consum Res 21(3):491–503CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Stern PC, Dietz T, Guagnano G (1995) The new ecological paradigm in social-psychological context. Environ Behav 27(6):723–743CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Institute of Business Administration, Department of MarketingKiel UniversityKielGermany
  2. 2.Department of MarketingGrenoble Ecole de ManagementGrenobleFrance

Personalised recommendations