Skip to main content

Ecological sustainability of material resources – Why material efficiency just isn’t enough

Abstract

In a finite system like the earth economical use and preservation of resources is mandatory. The aspiration to fulfil the demand of an increasing population with raised standards of living and to generate on-going economic growth leads to certain dilemmas concerning material resources. The paper will elaborate on the differences of economics with relatively scarce resources and economics with absolutely scarce resources with a focus on material resources. Currently many sustainability initiatives try to solve the problem of scarce resources by increasing efficiency. But general economic principles which increase efficiency such as economies of scale and learning curve effects demand high quantities and high lot sizes. Thus, efficiency in an economic sense does not always mean resource efficiency, which should not only include material efficiency but also preservation of resource availability and resource stewardship. If sustainability research takes the definition of the Brundtland report seriously and wants to meet “the needs of the present without compromising the ability of future generations to meet their own needs” then in the long run there needs to be a shift to renewable resources. This shift leads to new problems concerning overuse and tragedy of the commons as well as competition for acreage. The paper argues that sustainability research needs to change its focus from a mere increase of material efficiency to the problems of resource stewardship and preservation of natural resources taking a system dynamics perspective. It will elaborate on some of the possible directions these more wide-spread approaches may lead to.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

References

  • Albert M (2015) Gegensätze der Nachhaltigkeit. Working Paper 4‑1 Working Papers of the Chair for Innovation Research and Technology Management (BWL IX). TU Chemnitz, Chemnitz

    Google Scholar 

  • Altvater, E (2015a) Der Grundwiderspruch des 21. Jahrhunderts. In: Le Monde diplomatique (ed.) Atlas der Globalisierung. Taz, Berlin, 16–19

  • Altvater, E (2015b) Das Erdzeitlater des Kapitals. In: Le Monde diplomatique (ed.) Atlas der Globalisierung. Taz, Berlin, 44–47

  • Arrow K, Dasgupta P, Goulder L, Daily G, Ehrlich P, Heal G, Levin S, Mäler K‑G, Schneider S, Starrett D, Walker B (2004) Are we consuming too much? J Econ Perspect 18(3):147–172

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bartlett AA (2012) The meaning of sustainability. Teach Clgh Sci Soc Educ Newsl 31(1):1–17

    Google Scholar 

  • Berger R (2012) Mastering product complexity. https://www.rolandberger.de/media/pdf/Roland_Berger_Master_product_complexity_20121108.pdf. Accessed 23. Jun 2016

    Google Scholar 

  • Bpb = Bundeszentrale für politische Bildung (2014) Entwicklung des grenzüberschreitenden Warenhandels. http://www.bpb.de/nachschlagen/zahlen-und-fakten/globalisierung/52543/entwicklung-des-warenhandels. Accessed 17. Dez 2014

    Google Scholar 

  • Braungart M, McDonough W (2009) Cradle to cradle: re-making the way we make things. Vintage Books, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Cachon G, Terwiesch C (2012) Matching supply with demand: an introduction to operations management. McGraw Hill, Boston

    Google Scholar 

  • Chertow MR (2001) The IPAT equation and its variants. Changing views of technology and environmental impact. J Ind Ecol 4(4):13–29

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chopra S, Meindl P (2013) Supply chain management. strategy, planning, and operation, 5th edn. Pearson, Harlow

    Google Scholar 

  • Commoner B (1972) A bulletin dialogue on “the closing circle”: response. Bull At Sci 28(5):17, 42–56

    Google Scholar 

  • Commoner B, Corr M, Stamler PJ (1971) The closing circle: nature, man, and technology. Knopf, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Constanza R, Ruth M (1998) Using dynamic modeling to scope environmental problems and build consensus. Environ Manage 22(2):183–195

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dahmus JB (2014) Can efficiency improvements reduce resource consumption? A historical analysis of ten activities. J Ind Ecol 18(6):883–897

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Daily GC, Ehrlich PR (1992) Population, sustainability, and earth’s carrying capacity. Bioscience 42(10):761–771

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Daniels P, Bradshaw M, Shaw D, Sidaway J (2012) An introduction to human geography, 4th edn. Pearson, Harlow

    Google Scholar 

  • Deckert C (2015) Nachhaltige Logistik. Verbesserte Ressourcennutzung und Umweltverträglichkeit durch Green Logistics und City-Logistik. In: Deckert C (ed) CSR & Logistik. Spannungsfelder Green Logistics und City Logistik. Springer, Berlin

    Google Scholar 

  • Deckert C, Fröhlich E (2014) Green Logistics: Framework zur Steigerung der logistischen Nachhaltigkeit. Suppl Chain Manag II/2014(2014):13–18

    Google Scholar 

  • Dietz T, Rosa EA (1994) Rethinking the environmental impacts of population, affluence and technology. Hum Ecol Rev 1:277–300

    Google Scholar 

  • Dietz T, Rosa EA, York R (2012) Environmentally efficient well-being: is there a Kuznets curve? Appl Geogr 32(2012):21–28

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ehrlich PR, Holdren JP (1971) Impact of population growth. Science 171(3977):1212–1217

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ehrlich PR, Holdren JP (1972) A bulletin dialogue on “the closing circle”: critique. Bull At Sci 28(5):16, 18–27

    Google Scholar 

  • Ehrlich PR, Ehrlich AH, Holdren JP (1975) Humanökologie. Springer, Berlin u. a.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Forrester JW (2013) Industrial dynamics. Martino Publishing, Mansfield Centre

    Google Scholar 

  • Gans O, Jöst F (2005) Decomposing the impact of population growth on environmental deterioration. Discussion Paper Series, vol. 422. University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg

    Google Scholar 

  • Hardin G (1968) Tragedy of the commones. Science 162:1243–1248

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hartwig K‑H (2007) Umweltökonomie. In: Bender D et al (ed) Vahlens Kompendium der Wirtschaftstheorie und Wirtschaftspolitik, 7th edn. Vahlen, München, pp 129–170

    Google Scholar 

  • Heck S, Rogers M, Carroll P (2014) Resource revolution. How to capture the biggest business opportunity in a century. Amazon Publishing, Seattle

    Google Scholar 

  • Heizer J, Render B (2014) Principles of operations management. Sustainability and supply chain management, 9th edn. Pearson, Harlow

    Google Scholar 

  • Holm S‑O, Englund G (2008) Increased ecoefficiency and gross rebound effect: evidence from USA and six European countries 1960–2002. Soc Econ 68(2009):879–887

    Google Scholar 

  • Kanning H (2013) Nachhaltige Entwicklung – Die gesellschaftliche Herausforderung für das 21. Jahrhundert. In: Baumast A, Pape J (eds) Betriebliches Nachhaltigkeitsmanagement. Ulmer, Stuttgart, pp 21–43

    Google Scholar 

  • Kranert M, Cord-Landwehr K (2010) Einführung in die Abfallwirtschaft, 4th edn. Vieweg+Teubner, Wiesbaden

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Martens H (2011) Recyclingtechnik. Fachbuch für Lehre und Praxis. Spektrum Akademischer Verlag, Heidelberg

    Google Scholar 

  • Meadows D, Meadows D (1972) The limits to growth. A report for the club of rome’s project on the predicament of mankind. Universe Publishing, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Meyer WB (1996) Human impact on the earth. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Müller-Christ G (2014) Nachhaltiges Management: Einführung in Ressourcenorientierung und widersprüchliche Managementrationalitäten. UTB, Nomos, Baden-Baden

    Google Scholar 

  • Nentwig W (2005) Humanökologie. Fakten – Argumente – Ausblicke, 2nd edn. Springer, Berlin u. a

    Google Scholar 

  • Paech N (2012) Befreiung vom Überfluss. Auf dem Weg in die Postwachstumsökonomie. oekom, München

    Google Scholar 

  • Polimeni JM (2008) Empirical evidence for the Jevons paradox. In: Polimeni JM, Mayumi K, Giampietro M, Alcott B (eds) The Jevons paradox and the myth of resource efficiency improvements. Earthscan, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Porter ME (1998) Competitive strategy. Techniques for analyzing industries and competitors. Free Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Pufé I (2012) Nachhaltigkeit. UTB, Konstanz

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Reuter M (2007) Methodik der Werkstoffauswahl. Der systematische Weg zum richtigen Material. Hanser, München

    Google Scholar 

  • Ruth M, Hannon B (2012) Modeling dynamic economic systems (modeling dynamic systems). Springer, Berlin

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Santarius T (2012) Green growth unravelled. How rebound effects baffle sustainability targets when the economy keeps growing. Heinrich Böll Foundation, Berlin

    Google Scholar 

  • Santarius, T (2015) Umweltfreundlich mehr verbrauchen. In: Le Monde diplomatique (ed.) Atlas der Globalisierung. Taz, Berlin, 56–57

  • Schettkat R (2009) Analyzing rebound effects. Wuppertal Papers, vol. 177. Wuppertal Institute for Climate, Environment and Energy, Wuppertal, ISSN 0949–5266

    Google Scholar 

  • Schwister K (2010) Taschenbuch der Umwelttechnik, 2nd edn. Hanser, Leipzig

    Google Scholar 

  • Scott JC (1998) Seeing like a state. How certain schemes to improve the human condition have failed. Yale University Press, New Haven London

    Google Scholar 

  • Senge PM, Smith B, Kruschwitz N, Laur J, Schley S (2008) The necessary revolution. How individuals and organisations are working together to create a sustainable world. Doubleday, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Sinding-Larsen R, Wellmer F‑W (2012) Non-renewable resource issues: geoscientific and societal challenges: an introduction. In: Sinding-Larsen R, Wellmer F‑W (eds) Non-renewable resource issues: geoscientific and societal challenges. Springer, Berlin, pp 1–19

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Sorrell S (2010) Mapping rebound effects from sustainable behaviours. Key concepts and literature review. SLRG Working Paper 01-10 (ISSN: 2050-4446). http://www.sustainablelifestyles.ac.uk/sites/default/files/publicationsdocs/slrg_working_paper_01-10.pdf. Accessed 22 Jun 2016

    Google Scholar 

  • Sterman JD (2000) Business dynamics: system thinking and modeling for a complex world. McGraw Hill, Boston

    Google Scholar 

  • Tenner E (1997) Why things bite back: technology and the revenge of unintended consequences. Vintage Books, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • UN = United Nations, Department of Economic and Social Affairs, Population Division (2014) World urbanization prospects: the 2014 revision, highlights (ST/ESA/SER.A/352). UN, Department of Economic and Social Affairs, Population Division, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • UN = United Nations, Department of Economic and Social Affairs, Population Division (2015) World population prospects: the 2015 revision, key findings and advance tables. Working Paper No. ESA/P/WP.241

    Google Scholar 

  • UNDP = United Nations Development Programme (2014) Human development report 2014 – sustaining human progress: reducing vulnerabilities and building resilience

    Google Scholar 

  • Waggoner PE, Ausubel JH (2002) A framework for sustainability science: a renovated IPAT identity. Proc Natl Acad Sci 99(12):375–390

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • WCED = World Commission on Environment and Development (1988) Our common future. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Wellmer F‑W (2012) Discovery and sustainability. In: Sinding-Larsen R, Wellmer F‑W (eds) Non-renewable resource issues: geoscientific and societal challenges. Springer, Berlin, pp 35–43

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Wellmer F‑W, Steinbach V (2011) Is a road to sustainable use of non-renewable mineral raw materials possible? Proceedings Conference Sustainable Development in the Minerals Industry (SDIMI), Aachen, Jun 2011, pp 14–17

    Google Scholar 

  • Weston RF, Ruth M (1997) A dynamic, hierarchical approach to understanding and managing natural economic systems. Ecol Econ 21(1997):1–17

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Willke G (2006) Pocket Wirtschaft. Ökonomische Grundbegriffe, 2nd edn. bpb, Bonn

    Google Scholar 

  • World Bank (2016a) Birth rate, crude (per 1,000 people). http://data.worldbank.org/indicator/SP.DYN.CBRT.IN. Accessed 01 Jul 2016

    Google Scholar 

  • World Bank (2016b) Fertility rate, total (births per woman). http://data.worldbank.org/indicator/SP.DYN.TFRT.IN/. Accessed 01 Jul 2016

    Google Scholar 

  • World Bank (2016c) GDP growth (annual %). http://data.worldbank.org/indicator/NY.GDP.MKTP.KD.ZG. Accessed 30 Jun 2016

    Google Scholar 

  • Yellishetty M, Haque N, Dubreuil A (2012) Issues and challenges in life cycle assessment in the minerals and metals sector: a chance to improve raw materials efficiency. In: Sinding-Larsen R, Wellmer F‑W (eds) Non-renewable resource issues: geoscientific and societal challenges. Springer, Berlin, pp 229–246

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • York R, Rosa EA, Dietz T (2003) STIRPAT, IPAT and ImPACT: Analytic tools for unpacking the driving forces of environmental impacts. Ecol Econ 46(2003):351–365

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Carsten Deckert.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Deckert, C. Ecological sustainability of material resources – Why material efficiency just isn’t enough. uwf 24, 325–335 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00550-016-0419-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00550-016-0419-2

Keywords

  • Supply Chain
  • Renewable Resource
  • Resource Consumption
  • Rebound Effect
  • Resource Efficiency