Skip to main content
Log in

Biokunststoffe – quo vadis?

Eine ökologische und sozio-ökonomische Betrachtung

xxx

yyy

  • Schwerpunktthema
  • Published:
uwf UmweltWirtschaftsForum Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Are bioplastics sustainable? To answer this question transparent and reliable methods are needed. The article presents a short review of ecological and socio-economic aspects along the value chain of bioplastics with focus on the methodology state of the art and further developments.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Abb. 1
Abb. 2
Abb. 3

Literatur

  • Albrecht S (2014) Systematischer Ansatz zur Analyse der Energiekostensensitivität von Produktsystemen unter Berücksichtigung der Wertschöpfungskette im Rahmen der Ganzheitlichen Bilanzierung. Dissertation. Fraunhofer Verlag, Stuttgart

    Google Scholar 

  • Arvidsson R, Baumann H, Hildenbrand J (2014) On the scientific justification of the use of working hours, child labour and property rights in social life cycle assessment: three topical reviews. Int J Life Cycle Assess 19(6):1316–1330

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barthel L-P (2015) Methode zur Abschätzung sozialer Aspekte in Lebenszyklusuntersuchungen auf Basis statistischer Daten. Dissertation. Fraunhofer Verlag, Stuttgart

    Google Scholar 

  • Benoit-Norris C, Cavan DA, Norris G (2012) Identifying social impacts in product supply chain: overwiev and application of the Social Hotspots Database. Sustainability 4:1946–1965

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Benoît C, Mazijn B (Hrsg) (2009) Guidelines for social life cycle assessment of products. UNEP-SETAC Life Cycle Initiative, Paris

    Google Scholar 

  • Benoît Norris C (2014) Data for social LCA. Int J Life Cycle Assess 19(2):261–265

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • BMAS (2015) Bundesministerium für Arbeit und Soziales. www.csr-in-deutschland.de. Zugegriffen: 23. November 2015

    Google Scholar 

  • Duce A Del, Egede P, Öhlschläger G, Dettmer T, Althaus H-J, Bütler T, Szczechowicz E (2013) Guidelines for the LCA of electric vehicles. http://www.elcar-project.eu/fileadmin/dokumente/Guideline_versions/eLCAr_guidelines.pdf. Zugegriffen: 27. November 2015

    Google Scholar 

  • Detzel A (2015) Biokunststoffe im Blickpunkt der Nachhaltigkeitsbewertung AöL Biokunststoff-Verpackungstagung, Frankfurt, 21.Januar 2015.

    Google Scholar 

  • DIN EN ISO 14025:2011 (2011) Environmental labels and declarations – Type III environmental declarations – Principles and procedures. Beuth, Berlin

    Google Scholar 

  • DIN EN ISO 14040:2009 (2009) Environmental management – Life cycle assessment – Principles and framework. Beuth, Berlin

    Google Scholar 

  • DIN EN ISO 14044:2006 (2006) Environmental management – Life cycle assessment – Requirements and guidelines. Beuth, Berlin

    Google Scholar 

  • DIN CEN ISO/TS 14067:2014 (2014) Greenhouse gases – Carbon footprint of products – Requirements and guidelines for quantification and communication. Beuth, Berlin

    Google Scholar 

  • DIN EN ISO 14046:2015 (2015) Environmental management – Water footprint – Principles, requirements and guidelines. Beuth, Berlin

    Google Scholar 

  • DIN EN 16760:2014 (2014) Biobasierte Produkte – Ökobilanzen. Beuth, Berlin (Entwurf)

    Google Scholar 

  • Ekener PE, Höglund J, Finnveden G (2013) Social and Socioeconomic Impacts from Vehicle Fuels. Report No 2013:20, f3. The Swedish Knowledge Centre for Renewable Transportation Fuels, Sweden

    Google Scholar 

  • Endres H-J, Baitz M, Spierling S, Jürgens F (2014) The environmental sustainability of biopolymers-status quo, opportunities and approaches 9th European Bioplastic Conference, Brüssel, 3. Dezember 2014.

    Google Scholar 

  • Endres H-J, Siebert-Raths A (2009) Technische Biopolymere: Rahmenbedingungen, Marktsituation, Herstellung, Aufbau und Eigenschaften. Carl Hanser, München

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • European Bioplastics IfBB – Institut für Biokunststoffe und Bioverbundwerkstoffe, nova-Institut (2015) Weltweite Produktionskapazitäten für Biokunststoffe 2019 (nach Materialtyp). http://docs.european-bioplastics.org/2016/publications/md/EUBP_global_production_market_segment_total_2019_en.jpg. Zugegriffen: 27. April 2016

    Google Scholar 

  • Europäische Kommission (2013) Official Journal of the European Union – Comission Recommendation on the use of common methods to measure and communicate the life cycle environmental performance of products and organsiations. http://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/ALL/?uri=OJ%3AL%3A2013%3A124%3ATOC. Zugegriffen: 27. April 2016

    Google Scholar 

  • Europäische Kommission (2014) Richtlinie 2014/95/EU des Europäischen Parlaments und des Rates vom 22. Oktober 2014 zur Änderung der Richtlinie 2013/34/EU im Hinblick auf die Angabe nichtfinanzieller und die Diversität betreffender Informationen durch bestimmte große Unternehmen und Gruppen Text von Bedeutung für den EWR. http://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/DE/TXT/?uri=CELEX%3A32014L0095. Zugegriffen: 26. April 2016

  • Europäische Union (2014) Quality report of the European Union labour force survey 2013. Statistical Working papers: theme 3. Publications Office, Brüssel

    Google Scholar 

  • Gaasbeek A, Meijer E (2013) Handbook on a Novel Methodology for the Sustainability Impact Assessment of new Technologies. http://www.prosuite.org/web/guest/the-prosuite-framework;jsessionid=CA1B40F3DFE2696825520C0AFE9303B9. Zugegriffen: 24. November 2015

    Google Scholar 

  • GRI (2013) G4 – Leitlinien zur Nachhaltigkeitsberichterstattung. Teil 1. Global Reporting Initiative. https://www.globalreporting.org/resourcelibrary/German-G4-Part-One.pdf. Zugegriffen: 23. November 2015

    Google Scholar 

  • Grigoletto Duarte C, Wegg T, Dibo AP, Gallardo A (2014) Distribution of impacts in biofuels industry: applying social life-cycle assessment IAIA 14. (Conference Proceedings)

    Google Scholar 

  • Hof N (2015) Die Bedeutung lebenszyklusbezogener sozialer Aspekte innerhalb der Nachhaltigkeitsanalyse von Produkten. Masterthesis. Universität Kassel, Kassel

    Google Scholar 

  • Hosseinijou SA, Mansour S, Shirazi MA (2014) Social life cycle assessment for material selection: a case study of building materials. Int J Life Cycle Assess 19(3):620–645

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • IfBB – Institute for Bioplastics and Biocomposites (2015): Biopolymers facts and statistics. http://d-nb.info/1097422666/34 Zugegriffen: 27. April 2016

  • Manik Y, Leahy J, Halog A (2013) Social life cycle assessment of palm oil biodiesel: a case study in Jambi Province of Indonesia. Int J Life Cycle Assess 18:1386–1392

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Martínez-Blanco J, Lehmann A, Muñoz P, Antón A, Traverso M, Rieradevall J, Finkbeiner M (2014) Application challenges for the social Life Cycle Assessment of fertilizers within life cycle sustainability assessment. J Clean Prod 69:34–48

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Narayan R (2011) Carbon footprint of bioplastics using biocarbon content analysis and life-cycle assessment. MRS Bull 36(09):716–721

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • NOAA (2015) National Oceanic & Atmospheric Administration. Earth System Research Laboratory, Global Monitoring Division. http://esrl.noaa.gov/gmd/ccgg/trends. Zugegriffen: 23. November 2015

    Google Scholar 

  • Notarnicola B, Salomone R, Petti L, Renzulli PA, Roma R, Cerutti K (2015) Life Cycle Assessment in the Agri-food Sector – Case Studies, Methodological Issues and Best Practices. Springer International Publishing Switzerland, Cham

    Google Scholar 

  • Novamont (2010) Environmental Product Declaration MATER-BI® CF05S – Registration number: S-P-00222

  • Patel MK, Pawelzik P, Carus M, Hotchkiss J, Narayan R, Selke S, Wellisch M, Weiss M, Wicke B (2013) Critical aspects in the life cycle assessment (LCA) of bio-based materials – Reviewing methodologies and deriving recommendations. Resour Conserv Recycl 73:211–228

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • PCR (2010) Product Category Rules 2010:16 Plastics in primary forms (Version 2.11). http://www.environdec.com/en/PCR/Detail/pcr2010-16#.VlgQhUYntsk. Zugegriffen: 27. November 2015

    Google Scholar 

  • Pizzirani S, McLaren SJ, Seadon JK (2014) Is there a place for culture in life cycle sustainability assessment? Int J Life Cycle Assess 19(6):1316–1330

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • PlasticsEurope (2015) Plastics – the Facts 2015: An analysis of European plastics production, demand and waste data. http://www.plasticseurope.de/cust/documentrequest.aspx?DocID=65446. Zugegriffen: 23. November 2015

    Google Scholar 

  • Speirs J, McGlade C, Slade R (2015) Uncertainty in the availability of natural resources: Fossil fuels, critical metals and biomass. Energy Policy 87:654–664

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Svanes E, Vold M, Hanssen OJ (2011) Effect of different allocation methods on LCA results of products from wild-caught fish and on the use of such results. Int J Life Cycle Assess 16(6):512–521

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tsiropoulos I, Faaij APC, Lundquist L, Schenker U, Briois JF, Patel MK (2015) Life cycle impact assessment of bio-based plastics from sugarcane ethanol. J Clean Prod 90:114–127

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vink E, Davies S (2015) Life Cycle Inventory and Impact Assessment Data for 2014 Ingeo ™ Polylactide Production. Ind Biotechnol 11(3):167–180

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Danksagung

Die Autoren danken hiermit dem Bundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung (BMBF) sowie dem Projektträger Deutsches Zentrum für Luft- und Raumfahrt e. V. (DLR) für die Ermöglichung und Unterstützung des Forschungsprojektes „Neue Wege, Strategien, Geschäfts- und Kommunikationsmodelle für Biokunststoffe als Baustein einer Nachhaltigen Wirtschaft“ (BiNa) FKZ: 01UT1430 im Rahmen dessen diese Arbeiten entstanden sind.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sebastian Spierling.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Albrecht, S., Endres, HJ., Knüpffer, E. et al. Biokunststoffe – quo vadis?. uwf 24, 55–62 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00550-016-0390-y

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00550-016-0390-y

Navigation