Abstract
Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) gained importance over the last years. Yet, only few studies have investigated CSR in German family firms. This study analyzes the CSR communication of 714 listed German family and non-family firms using a content analysis of CSR mission statements. We find that family firms put strong emphasis in their CSR communication on the philanthropic dimension and convey CSR as part of their corporate culture. Non-family firms, in turn, are more likely to describe CSR as part of their corporate strategy.
Zusammenfassung
Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) hat in den letzten Jahren stark an Bedeutung gewonnen. Wenige Studien jedoch befassen sich mit CSR in Familienunternehmen. Die vorliegende Studies untersucht die CSR Kommunikation von 714 an der Börse gelisteten Familien- und Nichtfamilienunternehmen. Die empirischen Ergebnisse zeigen, dass Familienunternehmen im Vergleich zu Nichtfamilienunternehmen in ihrer CSR Kommunikation mehr Wert auf die philanthropische Dimension von CSR legen und CSR eher als Teil ihrer Unternehmenskultur und weniger als Teil ihrer Unternehmensstrategie verstehen.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Azzone G, Brophy M, Noci G, Welford R, Young W (1997) A stakeholders’ view of environmental reporting. Long Range Plan 30(5):699–709
Bassanini A, Breda T, Caroli E, Rebérioux A (2013) Working in family firms: paid less but more secure? Evidence from French matched employer-employee data. Ind Labor Relat Rev 66(2):433–466
BDI – The Voice of German Industry (2007) Ergebnisse der Online-Mittelstandsbefragung. BDI – The Voice of German Industry
Berrone P, Cruz C, Gómez-Mejía LR, Larraza-Kintana M (2010) Socioemotional wealth and corporate responses to institutional pressures: do family-controlled firms pollute less? Adm Sci Q 55:82–113
Block J (2010) Family management, family ownership, and downsizing: evidence from S&P 500 firms. Fam Bus Rev 23(2):1–22
Block J, Wagner M (2014) The effect of family ownership on different dimensions of corporate social responsibility: evidence from large U.S. firms. Bus Strategy Environ 23(7):475–492
Block JH, Fisch C, Lau J, Obschonka M, Presse A (2015) Who prefers working in a family firm? An exploratory study of individuals’ organizational preferences across 40 countries. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=2654608
Campopiano G, De Massis A (2014) Corporate social responsibility reporting: a content analysis in family and non-family firms. J Bus Ethics 129(3):1–24
Campopiano G, De Massis A, Chirico F (2014) Firm philanthropy in small-and medium-sized family firms. The effects of family involvement in ownership and management. Fam Bus Rev 27(3):244–258
Charmaz K (2006) Constructing grounded theory: a practical guide through qualitative analysis. Sage Publications, London
Coombs WT, Holladay SJ (2011) Managing corporate social responsibility: a communication approach. Wiley, Malden
Dahlsrud A (2008) How corporate social responsibility is defined: an analysis of 37 definitions. Corp Soc Responsib Environ Manag 15(1):1–13
Davis K (1973) The case for and against business assumption of social responsibilities. Acad Manag J 16(2):312–322
Deephouse DL, Jaskiewicz P (2013) Do family firms have better reputations than non‐family firms? An integration of socioemotional wealth and social identity theories. J Manag Stud 50(3):337–360
Dyer WG, Whetten DA (2006) Family firms and social responsibility: preliminary evidence from the S&P 500. Entrep Theory Pract 30(6):785–802
Esrock SL, Leichty GB (1998) Social responsibility and corporate web pages: self-presentation or agenda-setting? Public Relat Rev 24(3):305–319
European Commission (2011) Communication form the Commission to the European Parlia-ment, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions, A Renewed EU strategy 2011-14 for Corporate Social Responsibility, Euro-pean Commission, Brussels
Fifka MS (2013) Corporate responsibility reporting and its determinants in comparative perspective—A review of the empirical literature and a meta-analysis. Bus Strat Env 22(1):1–35
Fifka MS, Pobizhan M (2014) An institutional approach to corporate social responsibility in Russia. J Clean Prod 82:192–201
Foundation for Family Businesses in Germany and Europe (2007) Das gesellschaftliche Engagement von Familienunternehmen. Foundation for Family Businesses in Germany and Europe
Foundation for Family Businesses in Germany and Europe (2011) Die volkswirtschaftliche Bedeutung der Familienunternehmen. Foundation for Family Businesses in Germany and Europe
Freeman RE (1984) Strategic management – A stakeholder approach. Pitman Publishing, Boston
Friedrichs J (2006) Methoden empirischer Sozialforschung. VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften, Wiesbaden
Früh W (2007) Inhaltsanalyse. UVK Verlagsgesellschaft, Stuttgart
Gamerschlag R, Möller K, Verbeeten F (2011) Determinants of voluntary CSR disclosure: empirical evidence from Germany. RMS 5(2–3):233–262
Gao Y (2011) CSR in an emerging country: a content analysis of CSR reports of listed companies. Baltic J Manag 6(2):263–291
Glaser B, Strauss A (1967) The discovery of grounded theory: Strategies of qualitative research. Wiedenfeld & Nicholson
Global Reporting Initiative (GRI) (2011) Sustainability reporting guidelines, Version 3.1. Global Reporting Initiative, Amsterdam
Graafland J, Van de Ven B (2006) Strategic and moral motivation for corporate social responsibility. J Corp Citizsh 22:111–123
Gujarati DN, Porter D (2008) Basic econometrics. McGraw-Hill/Irwin, New York
Hackston D, Milne MJ (1996) Some determinants of social and environmental disclosures in New Zealand companies. Account, Audit Account J 9(1):77–108
Harris RJ (1985) A primer of multivariate statistics. Academic Press, Orlando
Harris KL (1996) Content analysis in negotiation research: a review and guide. Behav Res Methods Instrum Comput 28(3):458–467
Hartman LP, Rubin RS, Dhanda KK (2007) The communication of corporate social responsibility: united States and European Union multinational corporations. J Bus Ethics 74(4):373–389
Hodkinson P (2008) Grounded theory and inductive research. In: Gilbert N (eds) Researching social life, 3rd edn. Sage Publications, New York, pp 80–100
Hsieh H-F, Shannon SE (2005) Three approaches to qualitative content analysis. Qual Health Res 15:1277–1288
Institut für Mittelstandsforschungs Bonn (IfM Bonn) (2007) Die volkswirtschaftliche Bedeutung der Familienunternehmen, Top 500-Liste: Sortierung nach alphabetischer Reihenfolge. IfM Bonn, Bonn
Institute for Research into Medium-Sized Businesses (IfM Bonn) (2015) Definitions – Family enterprises as defined by IfM Bonn. Retreived from: http://en.ifm-bonn.org/definitions/family-enterprises-as-defined-by-ifm-bonn/, 05.08.2015
Institut für Mittelstandsforschungs Bonn (IfM Bonn) (2015) Family enterprises as defined by IfM Bonn. http://en.ifm-bonn.org/definitions/family-enterprises-as-defined-by-ifm-bonn/
Kabanoff B, Waldersee R, Cohen M (1995) Espoused values and organizational change themes. Acad Manag J 38(4):1075–1104
Keese D, Tänzler J-K, Hauer A (2010) Die Wahrnehmung gesellschaftlicher Ver-antwortung in Familien- und Nicht-Familienunternehmen. Z KMU Entrep 58(3):197–225
Klein SB (2000) Family businesses in Germany: significance and structure. Fam Bus Rev 13(3):157–182
Kolk A (2003) Trends in sustainability reporting by the Fortune Global 250. Bus Strategy Environ 12(5):279–291
Krappe A, Goutas L, Von Schlippe A (2011) The “family business brand”: an enquiry into the construction of the image of family businesses. J Fam Bus Manag 1(1):37–46
Krippendorff K (2004) Content analysis. An introduction to its methodology. Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks
Lamnek S (2010) Qualitative Sozialforschung. Beltz, Basel
Litz R, Stewart A (2000) Charity begins at home: family firms and patterns of community involvement. Nonprofit Volunt Sect Q 29(1):131–148
Loderer C, Martin K (1997) Executive ownership and performance. Tracking faint traces. J Financ Econ 45(2):223–255
Mahoney LS, Thorne L, Cecil L, LaGore W (2012) A research note on standalone corporate social responsibility reports: signaling or greenwashing? Crit Perspect Account 24(4):350–359
Marques P, Presas P, Simon A (2014) The heterogeneity of family firms in CSR engagement. The role of values. Fam Bus Rev. doi:0894486514539004
Mayring P (2008) Neuere Entwicklungen in der qualitativen Forschung und der qualitativen Inhaltsanalyse. In: Mayring P, Gläser-Zikuda M (eds) Die Praxis der qualitativen Inhaltsanalyse, 2nd edn. Beltz-Verlag, Weinheim, pp 7-19
Morck R, Yeung B (2004) Family control and the rent-seeking society. Entrep Theory Pract 28:391–409
Owen D (2007) Chronicles of wasted time? A personal reflection on the current state of, and future prospects for, social and environmental accounting research. Account Audit Account J 21(2):240–267
Patten DM (1992) Intra-industry environmental disclosures in response to the Alaskan oil spill: a note on legitimacy theory. Account Organ Soc 17(5):471–475
Potter WJ, Levine-Donnerstein D (1999) Rethinking validity and reliability in content analysis. J Appl Commun Res 27(3):258–284
Reimsbach D, Hahn R (2013) The effects of negative incidents in sustainability reporting on investors’ judgments—An experimental study of third-party versus self-disclosure in the realm of sustainable development. Bus Strategy Environ. doi:10.1002/bse.1816
Reverte C (2009) Determinants of corporate social responsibility disclosure ratings by Spanish listed firms. J Bus Ethics 88(2):351–366
Schröder M, Westerheide P (2010) Wirtschaftliche und gesellschaftliche Bedeutung von Familienunternehmen. Nomos Verlagsgesellschaft, Baden-Baden
Short JC, Palmer TB (2003) Organizational performance referents: an empirical examination of their content and influences. Organ Behav Hum Decis Process 90(2):209–224
Spence M (1973) Job market signaling. Q J Econ 87(3):355–374
Tänzler JK (2013) Corporate Governance und Corporate Social Responsibility im deutschen Mittelstand. Dissertation Universität Mannheim
Uhlaner LM, Goor-Balk HJM, Masurel E (2004) Family business and corporate social responsibility in a sample of Dutch firms. J Small Bus Enterp Deve 11(2):186–194
Urban D, Mayerl J (2006) Regressionsanalyse: Theorie, Technik und Anwendung, 2nd ed. VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften, Wiesbaden
Weber RP (1990) Basic content analysis. Sage Publications, Newbury Park
Weber J, Marley K (2012) In search of stakeholder salience: exploring corporate social and sustainability reports. Bus Soc 51(4):626–649
Wirtz M, Caspar F (2002) Beurteilerübereinstimmung und Beurteilerreliabilität. Hogrefe, Göttingen
Zellweger TM, Eddleston KA, Kellermanns FW (2010) Exploring the concept of familiness: introducing family firm identity. J Fam Bus Strategy 1(1):54–63
Ziek P (2009) Making sense of CSR communication. Corp Soc Responsib Environ Manag 16(3):137–145
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
The research benefited from generous research support of the EQUA Stiftung and the Hans-Frisch-Stiftung.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Block, J., Stiglbauer, M., Kühn, AL. et al. Corporate social responsibility communication of German family firms: a content analysis. uwf 23, 251–257 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00550-015-0366-3
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00550-015-0366-3