Skip to main content
Log in

Mitigation of raindrop impact using the multi-functional surface micro-patterns

  • Technical Paper
  • Published:
Microsystem Technologies Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Recently, drone has been used in various fields other than the military (defense) industry, including agriculture, leisure, and transportation. Most drones with high-velocity abilities are significantly affected by rain droplets when flying at this high velocity in rainy weather. As a result, the flying of almost all drones in rainy weather has been prohibited. We propose micro-pattern structures that can maintain hydrophobicity under static conditions and reduce the impact force during dynamic raindrop impingement. The case of a single droplet was analyzed, and the ability to control the collision force based on whether or not a structure exists was demonstrated. Further, the influence of the rebound time on the collision velocity, parameter ratio, and collision angle was analyzed. The analysis was then performed while considering the interaction of multiple droplets (two droplets). The influence of the rebound time, determined by the difference in the velocity at which the two droplets overlap; collision time; and incident angle was analyzed. It was proved that by controlling the dynamic flow characteristics through and rebound time of water droplets through surface shape deformation, the impact force can be minimized.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

We’re sorry, something doesn't seem to be working properly.

Please try refreshing the page. If that doesn't work, please contact support so we can address the problem.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14
Fig. 15

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abdel-Rahman AA, Chakroun WM (1997) Surface roughness effects on flow over aerofoils. Wind Eng 125–137

  • Asaro PM (2013) The labor of surveillance and bureaucratized killing: new subjectivities of military drone operators. Soc Semiot 23(2):196–224

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Backholm M, Molpeceres D, Vuckovac M, Nurmi H, Hokkanen MJ, Jokinen V, Ras RH (2020) Water droplet friction and rolling dynamics on superhydrophobic surfaces. Commun Mater 1(1):1–8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bhushan B, Jung YC (2008) Wetting, adhesion and friction of superhydrophobic and hydrophilic leaves and fabricated micro/nanopatterned surfaces. J Phys Condens Matter 20(22):225010

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brasseur JG, Wei T (2010) Designing large-eddy simulation of the turbulent boundary layer to capture law-of-the-wall scaling. Phys Fluids 22(2):021303

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chamakos NT, Kavousanakis ME, Boudouvis AG, Papathanasiou AG (2016) Droplet spreading on rough surfaces: Tackling the contact line boundary condition. Phys Fluids 28(2):022105

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Custers B (2016) Future of drone use. TMC Asser Press, The Hague, pp 3–20

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • De Ruijter MJ, De Coninck J, Oshanin G (1999a) Droplet spreading: partial wetting regime revisited. Langmuir 15(6):2209–2216

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • De Ruijter MJ, Blake TD, De Coninck J (1999b) Dynamic wetting studied by molecular modeling simulations of droplet spreading. Langmuir 15(22):7836–7847

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ding H, Spelt PD (2007) Inertial effects in droplet spreading: a comparison between diffuse-interface and level-set simulations. J Fluid Mech 576:287–296

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dou HS, Xu W, Khoo BC (2018) Stability of boundary layer flow based on energy gradient theory. Mod Phys Lett B 32(12n13):1840003

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fukagata K, Kasagi N, Koumoutsakos P (2006) A theoretical prediction of friction drag reduction in turbulent flow by superhydrophobic surfaces. Phys Fluids 18(5):051703

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gaver DP, Grotberg JB (1992) Droplet spreading on a thin viscous film. J Fluid Mech 235:399–414

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gupta A, Kumar R (2010) Droplet impingement and breakup on a dry surface. Comput Fluids 39(9):1696–1703

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haley PJ, Miksis MJ (1991) The effect of the contact line on droplet spreading. J Fluid Mech 223:57–81

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Kaminski ME (2013) Drone federalism: civilian drones and the things they carry. Calif l Rev Circuit 4:57

    Google Scholar 

  • Kreps SE, Wallace GP (2016) International law, military effectiveness, and public support for drone strikes. J Peace Res 53(6):830–844

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marzbali M, Dolatabadi A (2020) High-speed droplet impingement on dry and wetted substrates. Phys Fluids 32(11):112101

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moqaddam AM, Chikatamarla SS, Karlin IV (2017) Drops bouncing off macro-textured superhydrophobic surfaces. J Fluid Mech 824:866–885

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Olin P, Lindström SB, Pettersson T, Wågberg L (2013) Water drop friction on superhydrophobic surfaces. Langmuir 29(29):9079–9089

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Patil ND, Bhardwaj R, Sharma A (2016) Droplet impact dynamics on micropillared hydrophobic surfaces. Exp Therm Fluid Sci 74:195–206

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Qu J, Yang Y, Yang S, Hu D, Qiu H (2019) Droplet impingement on nano-textured superhydrophobic surface: experimental and numerical study. Appl Surf Sci 491:160–170

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Savva N, Kalliadasis S, Pavliotis GA (2010) Two-dimensional droplet spreading over random topographical substrates. Phys Rev Lett 104(8):084501

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ulbrich CW (1983) Natural variations in the analytical form of the raindrop size distribution. J Clim Appl Meteorol 22(10):1764–1775

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Winkler S, Zeadally S, Evans K (2018) Privacy and civilian drone use: the need for further regulation. IEEE Secur Priv 16(5):72–80

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ybert C, Barentin C, Cottin-Bizonne C, Joseph P, Bocquet L (2007) Achieving large slip with superhydrophobic surfaces: Scaling laws for generic geometries. Phys Fluids 19(12):123601

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yonemoto Y, Kunugi T (2017) Analytical consideration of liquid droplet impingement on solid surfaces. Sci Rep 7(1):1–11

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yuan Z, Matsumoto M, Kurose R (2021) Directional rebounding of a droplet impinging hydrophobic surfaces with roughness gradients. Int J Multiphase Flow 138:103611

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang G, Quetzeri-Santiago MA, Stone CA, Botto L, Castrejón-Pita JR (2018) Droplet impact dynamics on textiles. Soft Matter 14(40):8182–8190

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) grant funded by the Korea government (MSIT) (2021R1A2C2013053).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Kyoung-Su Park.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Park, DS., Park, KS. Mitigation of raindrop impact using the multi-functional surface micro-patterns. Microsyst Technol 28, 2203–2214 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00542-022-05255-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00542-022-05255-2

Navigation