Skip to main content
Log in

Closed‐loop control for self‐calibration of accelerometer achieved through integrated sensor and actuator system

  • Technical Paper
  • Published:
Microsystem Technologies Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In-situ self-calibration can fundamentally solve the problem of long-term stability of the accelerometer. The implementation of external integrated micro structure to provide physical excitation has become an effective method to compensate for the long-term drift error of the accelerometer. A closed-loop self-calibration system for accelerometers by integrating sensors and actuators is presented. The piezoelectric MEMS microvibrator acts as an acceleration source, providing a standard acceleration for the accelerometer integrated on it. An optical displacement sensing system consisting of vertical cavity surface emitting laser (VCSEL) and photodiodes (PDs) detects the motion state of the microvibrator to achieve the accurate output by closed-loop control. The self-calibration process of the accelerometer is performed by establishing an error model of the accelerometer and a vibration model of the integrated micro-vibrator. The drift error of the accelerometer is compensated by obtaining the error coefficient and the compensation coefficient. It has been verified that the error of the self-calibrated accelerometer when performing 15 g acceleration output is less than 1.5%.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Aggarwal P, Syed Z, Niu XA (2008) Standard testing and calibration procedure for low cost MEMS inertial sensors and units. J Navigation 61:323–336

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aktakka EE, Peterson RL, Najafi K (2013) A 6-DOF piezoelectric micro vibratory stage based on multi-axis distributed-electrode excitation of PZT/Si unimorph T-beams (2013) Transducers & Eurosensors XXVII: The 17th International Conference on Solid-State Sensors, Actuators and Microsystems (TRANSDUCERS & EUROSENSORS XXVII). IEEE, pp  1583–1586

  • Aktakka EE, Woo JK, Egert D et al (2014) A micro vibratory stage for on chip physical stimulation and calibration of MEMS gyroscopes. In: International Symposium on Inertial Sensors & Systems. IEEE, pp 1–2

  • Bai HW, Wang YW, Dong JZ (2014) Short-term observation data process of all in view based on the Kalman smoothing algorithm. Appl Mech Mater 563, 4

  • Bekkeng JK (2009) Calibration of a novel MEMS inertial reference unit. IEEE T Instrum Meas 58:1967–1974

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cao Y, Cai H, Zhang S (2011) A new continuous self-calibration scheme for a gimbaled inertial measurement unit. Meas Sci Technol 23:015103

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Casinovi G, Sung WK, Dalal M (2012) Electrostatic self-calibration of vibratory gyroscopes. IEEE International Conference on Micro Electro Mechanical Systems (MEMS), pp 559–562

  • Chen Y, Aktakka EE, Woo JK (2018) On-chip capacitive sensing and tilting motion estimation of a micro-stage for in situ MEMS gyroscope calibration. Mechatronics 56:242–253

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dar T, Suryanarayanan K, Geisberger A (2014) No physical stimulus testing and calibration for MEMS accelerometer. J Microelectromech S 23:811–818

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Edamana B, Chen Y, Slavin D et al (2015) Estimation with threshold sensing for gyroscope calibration using a Piezoelectric Microstage. IEEE Trans Control Syst Technol 23(5):1–1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • El-Diasty M, El-Rabbany A, Pagiatakis S (2007) Temperature variation effects on stochastic characteristics for low-cost MEMS-based inertial sensor error. Meas Sci Technol 18:3321–3328

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gao P, Li K, Wang LA, Self-Calibration (2016) Method for accelerometer nonlinearity errors in triaxis rotational inertial navigation system. IEEE T Instrum Meas 66:243–253

    Google Scholar 

  • Gao P, Li K, Song T (2017) An accelerometers size effect self-calibration method for tri-axis rotational inertial navigation system. IEEE T Ind Electron 65:1655–1664

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guo Q, Deng WH, Bebek O (2018) Personal inertial navigation system assisted by MEMS ground reaction sensor array and interface ASIC for GPS-denied environment. IEEE J Solid-St Circ 53:3039–3049

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harle R (2013) A survey of indoor inertial positioning systems for pedestrians. IEEE Commun Surv Tut 15:1281–1293

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Inokuchi M, Ando H, Kinosita M, et al (2009a) Development of a micro displacement sensor with monolithic-integrated two-dimensionally distributed photodiodes[C]. In:  IEEE/LEOS International Conference on Optical Mems and Nanophotonics. IEEE

  • Inokuchi M, Ando H, Kinosita M et al (2009b) Development of a micro displacement sensor with monolithic-integrated two-dimensionally distributed photodiodes. In: IEEE/LEOS International Conference on Optical Mems and Nanophotonics. IEEE

  • Jiao J, Jing C, Yan Q et al (2018) Single neuron PID control of agricultural robot steering system based on online identification. In: 2018 IEEE Fourth International Conference on Big Data Computing Service and Applications (BigDataService). IEEE, pp 193–199

  • Lee D, Lee S, Park S (2011) Test and error parameter estimation for MEMS—based low cost IMU calibration. Int J Precis Eng Man 12:597–603

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Long J, Ma S, Deng W et al (2018) Polarization-free high-crystallization β -PVDF piezoelectric nanogenerator toward self-powered 3D acceleration sensor. Nano Energy 50:632–638

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lutwak R (2014) Micro-technology for positioning, navigation, and timing towards PNT everywhere and always. International Symposium on Inertial Sensors and Systems

  • Martin H, Groves P, Newman M (2016) The limits of in-run calibration of MEMS inertial sensors and sensor arrays. Navigation 63:127–143

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Qin F, Gong D, Chen Y, Li X, Bao J, Wang Y, Sun X (2019) Integrated piezoelectric micromechanical vibration platform for six degree of freedom motion. J Micromech Microeng 29(11):115006

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sipos M, Paces P, Rohac J (2012) Analyses of triaxial accelerometer calibration algorithms. IEEE Sens J 12:1157–1165

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Takeshita T et al (2011) Characteristics of a monolithically integrated micro-displacement sensor. In Joint International IMEKO

  • Wang B, Ren Q, Deng ZA, Self-Calibration (2015) Method for nonorthogonal angles between Gimbals of rotational inertial navigation system. IEEE T Ind Electron 62:2353–2362

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Woske F, Kato T, Rievers B (2018) GRACE accelerometer calibration by high precision non-gravitational force modeling. Adv Space Res 63:1318–1335

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Xiong X, Wu YL, Jone WB (2005) A dual-mode built-in self-test technique for capacitive MEMS devices. IEEE T Instrum Meas 54:1739–1750

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yamane D, Matsushima T, Konishi T (2016) A dual-axis MEMS capacitive inertial sensor with high-density proof mass. Microsyst Technol 22:459–464

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yang D, Woo JK, Najafi K et al (2015) ±2 ppm frequency drift and 300x reduction of bias drift of commercial 6-axis inertial measurement units using a low-power oven-control micro platform. IEEE SENSORS. IEEE, pp 1–4.

  • Zhang H, Wu Y, Wu W (2010) Improved multi-position calibration for inertial measurement units. Meas Sci Technol 21:015107

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang B, Zhang L, Deng W et al (2017) Self-powered acceleration sensor based on liquid metal triboelectric nanogenerator for bibration monitoring. Acs Nano 11(7):7440

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zheng Z, Han S, Zheng K (2015) An eight-position self-calibration method for a dual-axis rotational inertial navigation system. Sensor Actuat A-Phys 232:39–48

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

Conceptualization and methodology, YW, XS and QZ; Validation, XL and TY; Investigation, YC and XL; Data curation, XL, DG and TY; Writing-original draft preparation, XS, XL; Writing-review and editing, XS, XL; Visualization, YC; Supervision, XS and YW.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Yicheng Wang or Xiangyu Sun.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Li, X., Wang, Y., Yang, T. et al. Closed‐loop control for self‐calibration of accelerometer achieved through integrated sensor and actuator system. Microsyst Technol 27, 3025–3035 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00542-020-05203-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00542-020-05203-y

Navigation