Skip to main content
Log in

An ergonomic shoulder for robot-aided rehabilitation with hybrid control

  • Technical Paper
  • Published:
Microsystem Technologies Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Over the past years, robot-aided rehabilitation has gained traction to regain lost mobility in upper limb due to stroke. In most cases, rehabilitative robotic devices have not considered movement of shoulder joint center (center of glenohumeral joint); however, this movement leads to misalignment of human joints with robot joints, which is undesirable in any circumstances. In this research, a 2 degrees of freedom (DOF) ergonomic robotic shoulder, namely RDS-2, was developed to realize full range of motion (ROM) for abduction/adduction and vertical flexion/extension. Two mechanisms, which were designed in our previous research, have been included to realize shoulder elevation/depression and shoulder protraction/retraction during shoulder movement. To control the exoskeleton, a simple hybrid non-liner control approach based on model robot’s dynamic model and its tracking error was developed. The stability of the controller was proved by Lyapunov stability. Experiments were done with slow, medium and fast pre-determined trajectories to see the efficacy of the used controller. The results show stability and robustness of used control approach for developed ergonomic shoulder.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig.8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14
Fig. 15
Fig. 16

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Amirabdollahian F, Loureiro R, Gradwell E, Collin C, Harwin W, Johnson G (2007) Multivariate analysis of the Fugl-Meyer outcome measures assessing the effectiveness of GENTLE/S robot-mediated stroke therapy. Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation 4:4

    Google Scholar 

  • National Stroke Association (2019) Rehabilitation therapy after a stroke. National Stroke Association, Englewood

    Google Scholar 

  • Bai S, Christensen S, Islam MRU (2017) An upper-body exoskeleton with a novel shoulder mechanism for assistive applications. In: 2017 IEEE international conference on advanced intelligent mechatronics (AIM), 3–7 July 2017, pp 1041–1046

  • Balasubramanian S, He J (2012) Adaptive control of a wearable exoskeleton for upper-extremity neurorehabilitation. Appl Bionics Biomech 9:99–115

    Google Scholar 

  • Balasubramanian S, Ruihua W, Perez M, Shepard B, Koeneman E, Koeneman J, Jiping H (2008) RUPERT: an exoskeleton robot for assisting rehabilitation of arm functions. 2008 Virtual Rehabilitation, 25–27 Aug 2008, pp 163–167

  • Benjamin EJ, Blaha MJ, Chiuve SE, Cushman M, Das SR, Deo R, de Ferranti SD, Floyd J, Fornage M, Gillespie C, Isasi CR, Jimenez MC, Jordan LC, Judd SE, Lackland D, Lichtman JH, Lisabeth L, Liu S, Longenecker CT, Mackey RH, Matsushita K, Mozaffarian D, Mussolino ME, Nasir K, Neumar RW, Palaniappan L, Pandey DK, Thiagarajan RR, Reeves MJ, Ritchey M, Rodriguez CJ, Roth GA, Rosamond WD, Sasson C, Towfighi A, Tsao CW, Turner MB, Virani SS, Voeks JH, Willey JZ, Wilkins JT, Wu JH, Alger HM, Wong SS, American Heart Association Statistics C, Stroke Statistics S (2017) Heart disease and stroke statistics-2017 update: a report From the American Heart Association. Circulation 135:e146–e603

    Google Scholar 

  • Brahim B, Ochoa-Luna C, Saad M, Assad-Uz-Zaman M, Islam MR, Rahman MH (2017) A new adaptive super-twisting control for an exoskeleton robot with dynamic uncertainties. In: 2017 IEEE great lakes biomedical conference (GLBC), 6–7 April 2017, pp 1–1

  • Brahmi B, Saad M, Luna CO, Archambault PS, Rahman MH (2018) Passive and active rehabilitation control of human upper-limb exoskeleton robot with dynamic uncertainties. Robotica 36:1757–1779

    Google Scholar 

  • Centre T. I. S (2019) Stroke statistics. The internet stroke centre. https://www.strokecenter.org/patients/about-stroke/stroke-statistics/. Accessed 12 Dec 2019

  • Chen Y, Li G, Zhu Y, Zhao J, Cai H (2014) Design of a 6-DOF upper limb rehabilitation exoskeleton with parallel actuated joints. Bio-Med Mater Eng 24:2527–2535

    Google Scholar 

  • Christensen S, Bai SA (2017) Novel shoulder mechanism with a double parallelogram linkage for upper-body exoskeletons. Springer International Publishing, Cham, pp 51–56

    Google Scholar 

  • Craig JJ (2017) Introduction to robotics: mechanics and control. Pearson, Upper saddle river

    Google Scholar 

  • Cui X, Chen W, Jin X, Agrawal SK (2017) Design of a 7-DOF cable-driven arm exoskeleton (CAREX-7) and a controller for dexterous motion training or assistance. IEEE/ASME Trans Mechatron 22:161–172

    Google Scholar 

  • Frisoli A, Salsedo F, Bergamasco M, Rossi B, Carboncini MC (2009) A force-feedback exoskeleton for upper-limb rehabilitation in virtual reality. Appl Bionics Biomech 6:115–126

    Google Scholar 

  • Gandolfi M, Formaggio E, Geroin C, Storti SF, Boscolo Galazzo I, Bortolami M, Saltuari L, Picelli A, Waldner A, Manganotti P, Smania N (2018) Quantification of upper limb motor recovery and EEG power changes after robot-assisted bilateral arm training in chronic stroke patients: a prospective pilot study. Neural Plast 2018:8105480. https://doi.org/10.1155/2018/8105480

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gopura RARC, Bandara DSV, Kiguchi K, Mann GKI (2016) Developments in hardware systems of active upper-limb exoskeleton robots: a review. Robot Auton Syst 75:203–220

    Google Scholar 

  • Gopura RARC, Kiguchi K, Li Y (2009) SUEFUL-7: a 7DOF upper-limb exoskeleton robot with muscle-model-oriented EMG-based control. In: 2009 IEEE/RSJ international conference on intelligent robots and systems, 10–15 Oct. 2009, pp 1126–1131

  • Halder AM, Itoi E, An K-N (2000) Anatomy and biomechanics of the shoulder. Orthop Clin 31:159–176

    Google Scholar 

  • Islam M, Spiewak C, Rahman M, Fareh R (2017) A brief review on robotic exoskeletons for upper extremity rehabilitation to find the gap between research porotype and commercial type. Adv Robot Autom 6:2

    Google Scholar 

  • Islam MR, Assad-Uz-Zaman M, Rahman MH (2019) Design and control of an ergonomic robotic shoulder for wearable exoskeleton robot for rehabilitation. Int J Dyn Control 8:312–325

    Google Scholar 

  • Jang H-Y, Ji Y-H, Han J-S, Khan AM, Ahn J-Y, Han C-S (2015) Development and verification of upper extremities wearable robots to aid muscular strength with the optimization of link parameters. Int J Precis Eng Manuf 16:2569–2575

    Google Scholar 

  • Janne MV, Anneli CL-A, Erwin EHVW, Carel GMM, Gert K (2016) Effects of robot-assisted therapy for the upper limb after stroke: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Neurorehabil Neural Repair 31:107–121

    Google Scholar 

  • Jarrassé N, Proietti T, Crocher V, Robertson J, Sahbani A, Morel G, Roby-Brami A (2014) Robotic exoskeletons: a perspective for the rehabilitation of arm coordination in stroke patients. Front Hum Neurosci 8:947

    Google Scholar 

  • Kiguchi K, Rahman MH, Sasaki M, Teramoto K (2008) Development of a 3DOF mobile exoskeleton robot for human upper-limb motion assist. Robot Auton Syst 56:678–691

    Google Scholar 

  • Kim B, Deshpande AD (2015) Controls for the shoulder mechanism of an upper-body exoskeleton for promoting scapulohumeral rhythm. In: 2015 IEEE International Conference on Rehabilitation Robotics (ICORR), 11–14 Aug. 2015, pp 538–542

  • Kim B, Deshpande AD (2017) An upper-body rehabilitation exoskeleton Harmony with an anatomical shoulder mechanism: design, modeling, control, and performance evaluation. Int J Robot Res 36:414–435

    Google Scholar 

  • Kim G, Lim S, Kim H, Lee B, Seo S, Cho K, Lee W (2017) Is robot-assisted therapy effective in upper extremity recovery in early stage stroke? —a systematic literature review. J Phys Ther Sci 29:1108–1112

    Google Scholar 

  • Kim J-Y, Yang U-J, Park K (2014) Design, motion planning and control of frozen shoulder rehabilitation robot. Int J Precis Eng Manuf 15:1875–1881

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee H, Lee B, Kim W, Gil M, Han J, Han C (2012) Human-robot cooperative control based on pHRI (Physical Human-Robot Interaction) of exoskeleton robot for a human upper extremity. Int J Precis Eng Manuf 13:985–992

    Google Scholar 

  • Li Z, Su C, Li G, Su H (2015) Fuzzy approximation-based adaptive backstepping control of an exoskeleton for human upper limbs. IEEE Trans Fuzzy Syst 23:555–566

    Google Scholar 

  • Liu L, Shi Y-Y, Xie L (2016) A novel multi-DOF exoskeleton robot for upper limb rehabilitation. J Mech Med Biol 16:1640023

    Google Scholar 

  • Maciejasz P, Eschweiler J, Gerlach-Hahn K, Jansen-Troy A, Leonhardt S (2014) A survey on robotic devices for upper limb rehabilitation. J NeuroEng Rehabil 11:3

    Google Scholar 

  • Madani T, Daachi B, Djouani K (2017) Modular-controller-design-based fast terminal sliding mode for articulated exoskeleton systems. IEEE Trans Control Syst Technol 25:1133–1140

    Google Scholar 

  • Mahdavian M, Toudeshki AG, Yousefi-Koma A (2015) Design and fabrication of a 3DoF upper limb exoskeleton. In: 2015 3rd RSI international conference on robotics and mechatronics (ICROM), 7–9 Oct. 2015, pp 342–346

  • Mozaffarian D, Benjamin EJ, Go AS, Arnett DK, Blaha MJ, Cushman M, de Ferranti S, Despres JP, Fullerton HJ, Howard VJ, Huffman MD, Judd SE, Kissela BM, Lackland DT, Lichtman JH, Lisabeth LD, Liu S, Mackey RH, Matchar DB, McGuire DK, Mohler ER 3rd, Moy CS, Muntner P, Mussolino ME, Nasir K, Neumar RW, Nichol G, Palaniappan L, Pandey DK, Reeves MJ, Rodriguez CJ, Sorlie PD, Stein J, Towfighi A, Turan TN, Virani SS, Willey JZ, Woo D, Yeh RW, Turner MB, American Heart Association Statistics C, Stroke Statistics S (2015) Heart disease and stroke statistics–2015 update: a report from the American Heart Association. Circulation 131:e29–322

    Google Scholar 

  • Nef T, Guidali M, Klamroth-Marganska V, Riener R (2009a) ARMin—exoskeleton robot for stroke rehabilitation. In: Dössel O, Schlegel WC (eds) World congress on medical physics and biomedical engineering, September 7–12, 2009, Munich, Germany, 2009. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, pp 127–130

  • Nef T, Guidali M, Riener R (2009) ARMin III & #x2013; arm therapy exoskeleton with an ergonomic shoulder actuation. Appl Bionics Biomech 6:127–142

    Google Scholar 

  • Niyetkaliyev AS, Hussain S, Ghayesh MH, Alici G (2017) Review on design and control aspects of robotic shoulder rehabilitation orthoses. IEEE Trans Hum Mach Syst 47:1134–1145

    Google Scholar 

  • Otten A, Voort C, Stienen A, Aarts R, Asseldonk EV, Kooij HVD (2015) LIMPACT: a hydraulically powered self-aligning upper limb exoskeleton. IEEE/ASME Trans Mechatron 20:2285–2298

    Google Scholar 

  • Poli P, Morone G, Rosati G, Masiero S (2013) Robotic technologies and rehabilitation: new tools for stroke patients’; therapy. Biomed Res Int 2013:8

    Google Scholar 

  • Rahman MH, Rahman MJ, Cristobal OL, Saad M, Kenné JP, Archambault PS (2014) Development of a whole arm wearable robotic exoskeleton for rehabilitation and to assist upper limb movements. Robotica 33:19–39

    Google Scholar 

  • Rahman MH, Saad M, Kenné J-P, Archambault PS (2013) Control of an exoskeleton robot arm with sliding mode exponential reaching law. Int J Control Autom Syst 11:92–104

    Google Scholar 

  • Razzaghian A, Moghaddam RK (2015) Fuzzy sliding mode control of 5 DOF upper-limb exoskeleton robot. In: 2015 international congress on technology, communication and knowledge (ICTCK), 11–12 Nov 2015, pp 25–32

  • Riani A, Madani T, Benallegue A, Djouani K (2018) Adaptive integral terminal sliding mode control for upper-limb rehabilitation exoskeleton. Control Eng Pract 75:108–117

    Google Scholar 

  • Sale P, Franceschini M, Mazzoleni S, Palma E, Agosti M, Posteraro F (2014) Effects of upper limb robot-assisted therapy on motor recovery in subacute stroke patients. J NeuroEng Rehabil 11:104

    Google Scholar 

  • Schenkman M, Rugo De Cartaya V (1987) Kinesiology of the shoulder complex. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 8:438–450

    Google Scholar 

  • Schiele A, Helm FCTVD (2006) Kinematic design to improve ergonomics in human machine interaction. IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng 14:456–469

    Google Scholar 

  • Slotine J, Li W (1991) Applied nonlinear control, vol 199. Prentice-hall, Englewood Cliffs

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Stienen AHA, Hekman EEG, Helm FCTVD, Kooij HVD (2009) Self-aligning exoskeleton axes through decoupling of joint rotations and translations. IEEE Trans Robot 25:628–633

    Google Scholar 

  • Teasell RW, Kalra L (2004) What’s new in stroke rehabilitation. Stroke 35:383–385

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Cott HP, Kinkade RG (1972) Human engineering guide to equipment design, [Washington], [Dept. of Defense; for sale by the Supt. of Docs., U.S. Govt. Print. Off.]

  • Winter DA (2009) Anthropometry. Biomechanics and motor control of human movement. Wiley, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Xiao F, Gao Y, Wang Y, Zhu Y, Zhao J (2017) Design of a wearable cable-driven upper limb exoskeleton based on epicyclic gear trains structure. Technol Health Care 25:3–11

    Google Scholar 

  • Xiao F, Gao Y, Wang Y, Zhu Y, Zhao J (2018) Design and evaluation of a 7-DOF cable-driven upper limb exoskeleton. J Mech Sci Technol 32:855–864

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

There is no one to acknowledge.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Md Rasedul Islam.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Islam, M.R., Assad-Uz-Zaman, M., Al Zubayer Swapnil, A. et al. An ergonomic shoulder for robot-aided rehabilitation with hybrid control. Microsyst Technol 27, 159–172 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00542-020-04934-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00542-020-04934-2

Navigation