Hydrogel coating on soft polymeric substrates for microfluidic devices

  • Kumkum Ahmed
  • Naoya Yamada
  • Masato Wada
  • Toshiki Kameyama
  • Masaru Kawakami
  • Ajit Khosla
  • Hidemitsu Furukawa
Technical Paper


In microfabricated MEMS actuator, sensor and biomedical devices, soft polymeric materials like PDMS are widely used for lightweight, low cost, high corrosion resistance, high flexibility and high dimensional stability. Along with their numerous beneficial functions these materials have some shortcomings during real application for their hydrophobic high frictional surface and stiction. In this work we have developed a facile way of hydrogel coating on PDMS substrate by highly hydrophilic hydrogels N,N, dimethylacrylamide as a monomer. This gel is highly hydrophilic in nature having biocompatibility and shows very low friction coefficient value in wet condition. Frictional property, wettability and the surface morphology were studied and comparison between coated and uncoated surface has been made to understand the coating phenomenon clearly.



This study was partly supported by the Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research (Category B, Project No.: 25288094, etc.) from the Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (JSPS), the national project named “Green Tribology Innovation Network” in the area of Advanced Environmental Materials, Green Network of Excellence (GRENE), the Innovative Innovation Generation Program (Center Of Innovation, COI-T) from the JST and the Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology (MEXT) in Japan, the Regional Open Innovation Promotion Project from the Ministry of Economy in Japan, and the Strategic Innovation Creation Project (SIP) from the New Energy and Industrial Technology Development Organization (NEDO) of Japan.


  1. Albarghouthi MN, Stein TM, Barron AE (2003) Poly N-hydroxyethylacrylamide as a novel, adsorbed coating for protein separation by capillary electrophoresis. Electrophoresis 24:1166–1175CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Cha C, Antoniadou E, Lee M, Jeong JH, Ahmed WW, Saif TA, Boppart SA, Kong H (2013) Tailoring hydrogel adhesion to polydimethylsiloxane substrates using polysaccharide glue. Angew Chem Int Ed 52:6949–6952CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Chen B, Seidel S, Hori H, Gupta M (2011) Self-assembly of pillars modified with vapor deposited polymer coatings. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces 3:4201CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Chen B, Riche CT, Lehmann M, Gupta M (2012) Responsive polymer welds via solution casting for stabilized self-assembly. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces 4:6911–6916CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Chung D, Khosla A, Gray BL, Ash Parameswaran M, Ramaseshan R, Kohli K (2014) Investigations of flexible Ag/AgCl nanocomposite polymer electrodes for suitability in tissue electrical impedance scanning (EIS). J Electrochem Soc. Google Scholar
  6. Gervais L, Delamarche E (2009) Toward one-step point-of-care immunodiagnostics using capillary-driven microfluidics and PDMS substrates. Lab Chip 9:3330CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Gilges M, Kleemiss MH, Schomburg G (1994) Capillary zone electrophoresis separations of basic and acidic proteins using poly(vinyl alcohol) coatings in fused silica capillaries. Anal Chem 66:2038–2046CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Gray BL, Khosla A (2010) Microfabrication and applications of nanoparticle doped conductive polymers. Nanoelectron Nanowires Mol Electron Nanodevices 227:10Google Scholar
  9. Kassegne S, Mehta B, Khosla A (2015) Manufacturing of high aspect-ratio 3-dimensional PolyFerroCNT nanocomposite polymer electrodes. Microsyst Technol 21:1619. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Khosla A (2011) Micropatternable multifunctional nanocomposite polymers for flexible soft MEMS applications. Diss. Applied Science: School of Engineering Science.
  11. Khosla A, Gray BL (2010) Fabrication and properties of conductive micromoldable thermosetting polymer for electronic routing in highly flexible microfluidic systems. Microfluidics, BioMEMS, and Medical Microsystems VIII, vol 7593. International Society for Optics and Photonics.
  12. Khosla A, Gray BL (2012) New technologies for large-scale micropatterning of functional nanocomposite polymers. In: Nanosensors, biosensors, and info-tech sensors and systems, vol 8344. International Society for Optics and Photonics, p. 83440W.
  13. Khosla A, Kassegne S (2015) Fabrication of NdFeB-based permanent rare-earth micromagnets by novel hybrid micromolding process. Microsyst Technol 21:2315. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Kim E, Xia Y, Whitesides GM (1995) Polymer microstructures formed by moulding in capillaries. Nature 376(6541):581. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Lim F, Yang CZ, Cooper SL (1994) Bloodcontacting properties of polydimethylsiloxane polyureaurethanes. Biomaterials 15:408CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Makamba H, Kim JH, Lim K, Park N, Hahn JH (2003) Surface modification of poly(dimethylsiloxane) microchannels. Electrophoresis 24:3607CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Mcdonald JC, Whitesides GM (2002) Poly(dimethylsiloxane) as a material for fabricating microfluidic devices. Acc Chem Res 35:491CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Ozhikandathil J, Khosla A, Packirisamy M (2015) Electrically conducting PDMS nanocomposite using in situ reduction of gold nanostructures and mechanical stimulation of carbon nanotubes and silver nanoparticles. ECS J. Solid State Sci Technol 4(10):S3048–S3052.,
  19. Peppas NA (ed) (1987) Hydrogels in medicine and pharmacy. Wiley, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  20. Pinto S, Alves P, Matos CM, Santos AC, Rodrigues LR, Teixeira JA, Gil MH (2010) Poly(dimethyl siloxane) surface modification by low pressure plasma to improve its characteristics towards biomedical applications. Colloids Surf B 81:20CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Rahbar M, Seyfollahi S, Khosla A, Gray BL, Shannon L (2012) Fabrication process for electromagnetic actuators compatible with polymer based microfluidic devices. ECS Trans 41(20):7–17.,
  22. Rivet C, Lee H, Hirsch A, Hamilton S, Lu H (2011) Two-phase microfluidic flows. Chem Eng Sci 66:1490CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Shah S, Shiblee MI, Rahman JMH et al (2017) D printing of electrically conductive hybrid organic–inorganic composite materials. Microsyst Technol. Google Scholar
  24. Uemura Y, McNulty J, Macdonald PM (1995) Associative behavior and diffusion coefficients of hydrophobically modified poly(N, N dimethylacrylamides). Macromolecules 28:4150–4158CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Wada M, Hidema R, Chiba T, Yamada K, Yamada N, Gong J, Furukawa H (2013) Surface and bulk mechanical properties of soft and wet materials. J Solid Mech Mater Eng 7(2):235–244CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Wong I, Ho CM (2009) Surface molecular property modifications for poly(dimethylsiloxane) (PDMS) based microfluidic devices. Microfluid Nanofluid 7:291CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Zhang H, Chiao M (2014) Poly(dimethylsiloxane) devices for biological and biomedical applications. J Med Biol Eng. Google Scholar
  28. Zhang JY, Tran NT, Weber J, Slim C, Viovy JL, Taverna M (2006) Poly(N, N-dimethylacrylamide)-grafted polyacrylamide: a self-coating copolymer for sieving separation of native proteins by CE. Electrophoresis 27:3086–3092CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Zhou J, Ellis AV, Voelcker NH (2010) Recent developments in PDMS surface modification for microfluidic devices. Electrophoresis 31:2CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Zhou J, Khodakov DA, Ellis AV, Voelcker NH (2012) Surface modification for PDMS-based microfluidic devices. Electrophoresis 33:89CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Mechanical Systems EngineeringYamagata UniversityYonezawaJapan
  2. 2.Department of Creative EngineeringTsuruoka National College of TechnologyTsuruokaJapan
  3. 3.Yokohama National UniversityHodogawaJapan

Personalised recommendations