Mechanism of ultra-low friction of multilayer graphene studied by all atom molecular dynamics

Technical Paper

Abstract

A molecular dynamics simulation is used to investigate the occurrence of thermal escape motion of a graphene transfer layer in all atom levels. In the simulation, the substrate is modelled as a 3-layer graphene slab, and the transfer layer as layered circle graphene sheets. The top graphene sheet is force to move in a constant velocity. After the sliding motion, the dynamics of the transfer layers showed different dependences on the sliding velocity and the size of the graphene sheet. Only when the sliding motion is low enough and the size is large enough, is the thermal escape motion found. When the sliding speed is too high, the lower layers cannot follow the top sheet. When the graphene sheet is too small, the lower layered structure is broken due to an internal motion. The latter motion is not found during the study using the previous coarse-grained simulation. The size of the layers experimentally observed is the same as this simulation, and when the sliding motion is low enough, a low friction is observed. Thus, a low friction is indicated as a result of the thermal escape motion.

References

  1. Almeida M (2016) Giant and tunable anisotropy of nanoscale friction in graphene. Sci Rep 6:1–9CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bhushan B (ed) (2008) Nanotribology and nanomechanics, an introduction. Springer, BerlinGoogle Scholar
  3. Bowden FP, Tabor D (1950) The friction and lubrication of solids. Oxford Univ. Press, OxfordMATHGoogle Scholar
  4. Cornell WD et al (1995) A second generation force field for the simulation of proteins, nucleic acids, and organic molecules. J Am Chem Soc 117:51795197CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Dienwiebel M et al (2005) Model experiments of superlubricity of graphite. Surf Sci 576:197–211CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. El Mansori M, Schmitt M, Paulmier D (1998) Role of transferred layers in friction and wear for magnetized dry frictional applications. Surf Coat Technol 108–109:479–483CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Girifalco L, Hodak M, Lee RS (2000) Carbon nanotubes, buckyballs, ropes, and a universal graphitic potential. Phys Rev B 62:13104CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Hirano M (2014) Atomistics of superlubricity. Friction 2(2):95–105CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Kajita S, Washizu H, Ohmori T (2009) Deep bulk atoms in a solid cause friction. Eur Phys Lett 87(6):66002CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Kajita S, Washizu H, Ohmori T (2010) Approach of semi-infinite dynamic lattice Green’s function and energy dissipation due to phonons in solid friction between commensurate surfaces. Phys Rev B 82:115424CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Kajita S, Washizu H, Ohmori S (2012) Simulation of solid-friction dependence on number of surface atoms and theoretical approach for infinite number of atoms. Phys Rev B 86:07545CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Kawai S et al (2016) Superlubricity of graphene nanoribbons on gold surfaces. Science 351:6276CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Ma M et al (2016) Fast diffusion of water nanodroplets on graphene. Nat Mater 15:66–71CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Nachane RP, Hussain GFS, Krishna KR (1998) Theory of stick-slip effect in friction. IJFTR 23:201–208Google Scholar
  15. Plimpton S (1995) Fast parallel algorithms for short-range molecular dynamics. J Comp Phys 117:1–19CrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  16. Sasaki N, Kobayashi K, Tsukada M (1996) Atomic-scale friction image of graphite in atomic-force microscopy. Phys Rev B 54:2138CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Washizu H, Kajita S, Tohyama M, Ohmori T, Nishino N, Teranishi H, Suzuki A (2012) Mechanism of ultra low friction of multilayer graphene studied by coarse-grained molecular simulation. Faraday Disc 156(1):279–291CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Graduate School of Simulation StudiesUniversity of HyogoKobeJapan
  2. 2.Elements Strategy Initiative for Catalysts and Batteries (ESICB)Kyoto UniversityKyotoJapan

Personalised recommendations