Sustained elevation of activity of developing neurons grown on polyimide microelectrode arrays (MEA) in response to ultrasound exposure
- 300 Downloads
High frequency ultrasound (HFUS) is an attractive modality for noninvasive clinical applications such as imaging, diagnostics and more recently for stimulation of the central nervous system. The aim of this study was to investigate the modulation in the electrical activity of developing neurons due to the application of HFUS using polyimide based microelectrode array (MEA) that is acoustically transparent in order to allow ultrasound waves to transmit through the substrate and reach the growing neural layer. High frequency tone bursts of ultrasound were applied to a monolayer of developing primary neurons grown on an acoustical transparent polyimide MEA. HFUS was applied to primary neuronal culture at two frequencies (4.4 and 96 MHz) with spatial peak-temporal average intensities of 100 and 10 mW/cm2. Exposures were found to increase the spike rate of neurons in culture up to 20-fold in some cases and induce silent or still developing neurons to fire at a maximum rate of up to three new units per recording microelectrode. Another new observation reported in this study is that the increase in spike rate was sustained for over 6 min post stimulation. Our results also suggest that mechanical and not thermal effects of ultrasound largely mediate the increase in electrical excitability without any discernible spatial pattern or preference across the monolayer for the US parameters used in this study. The accessibility of the disassociated neuronal cultures to stimulation, imaging and recording provides a useful model for investigating the exact mechanisms behind the effect of ultrasound on neuronal excitability.
KeywordsPolyimide Spike Rate Ultrasound Wave Pressure Pattern Microelectrode Array
The authors would like to thank Dr. Bruce Towe, Professor of Biomedical Engineering at Arizona State University for his helpful discussions and insights.
- Fleischer AC, Fleischer A, Toy EC, Toy E, Lee W, Manning FA (2011) Sonography in obstetrics and gynecology: principles and practice by 6 edition. McGraw-Hill Professional, New York CityGoogle Scholar
- Hu JH, Ulrich WD (1976) Effects of low-intensity ultrasound on the central nervous system of primates. Aviat Space Environ Med 47:640–643Google Scholar
- Korb AS, Shellock FG, Cohen MS, Bystritsky A (2014) Low-intensity focused ultrasound pulsation device used during magnetic resonance imaging: evaluation of magnetic resonance imaging-related heating at 3 Tesla/128 MHz. Neuromodul Technol Neural Interface 17:236–241. doi: 10.1111/ner.12075 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Mihran RT, Barnes FS, Wachtel H (1990b) Transient modification of nerve excitability in vitro by single ultrasound pulses. Biomed Sci Instrum 26:235–246Google Scholar
- Philips WB (2002) In vitro modification of nerve excitability via high frequency ultrasound pulses. Dissertation, Arizona State University, TempeGoogle Scholar
- Phillips WB, Larson PJ, Towe BC (2004) Ultrasonically-assisted intracortical microstimulation of the rat. Conf Proc IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc 6:4217–4220Google Scholar
- Stephenson J (2005) Fetal ultrasound safety, vol 293. doi: 10.1001/jama.293.3.286-c
- Tarantal AF, O’Brien WD, Hendrickx AG (1993) Evaluation of the bioeffects of prenatal ultrasound exposure in the cynomolgus macaque (Macaca fascicularis): III. Dev Hematol Studies Teratol 47:159–170Google Scholar