Microsystem Technologies

, Volume 22, Issue 7, pp 1585–1592 | Cite as

An accelerated thermal cycling test for RF-MEMS switches

Technical Paper


Thermal cycling tests are an important part of the standard space qualification procedure for RF-MEMS devices. Standardized tests are rather demanding in terms of equipment, sample preparation and experimental time. In this paper, we present a fast thermal cycling test aimed at obtaining a rapid selection among different switch geometries in terms of thermal cycling resistance. Seven different switch typologies are examined and tested, evidencing that the most important source of deterioration is the mechanical deformation of the movable membrane due to changes in internal stresses. For this reason, the clamping typology is the most important design parameter to take into account in order to achieve a good thermal cycling resistance. Contrarily to expectations, the cantilever structure is not the most promising switch typology, because while the main part of the movable membrane is stress free, the anchoring part of the structure is on the contrary heavily stressed and modifies with the temperature change. The most promising structure is a four-anchored switch with a flexural clamping structure that allows the thermal expansions in the horizontal direction, while the data for all the clamped–clamped structures investigated are similar and their differences can be interpreted in terms of different distribution of the thermal strain over the whole membrane.


Residual Stress Thermal Cycling Thermal Strain Resistant Switch Actuation Voltage 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


  1. Blondy P, Crunteanu A, Pothier A, Tristant P, Catherinot A, Champeaux C (2007) Effects of atmosphere on the reliability of RF-MEMS capacitive switches. In: Proceedings of the European Microwave Conference. pp 1346–1348. doi: 10.1109/EUMC.2007.4405452
  2. Daneshmand M, Mansour R (2007) Redundancy RF MEMS multiport switches and switch matrices. IEEE J Microelectromech Syst 16:296–303. doi: 10.1109/JMEMS.2007.892891 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Giacomozzi F, Mulloni V, Colpo S, Iannacci J, Margesin B, Faes A (2011) A flexible technology platform for the fabrication of RF MEMS devices. In: Proceedings of International Semiconductor Conference (CAS), vol 1, pp 155–158. doi: 10.1109/SMICND.2011.6095744
  4. Lucibello A, Capoccia G, Proietti E, Marcelli R, Margesin B, Mulloni V, Giacomozzi F, Vitulli F, Scipioni M, Bartolucci G (2015) Reliable response of RF MEMS LTCC packaged switches after mechanical and thermal stress. Microsyst Technol. doi: 10.1007/s00542-015-2577-5 Google Scholar
  5. Mulloni V, Giacomozzi F, Margesin B (2010) Controlling stress and stress gradient during the release process in gold suspended micro-structures. Sens Actuators A 162:93–99. doi: 10.1016/j.sna.2010.06.013 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Mulloni V, Solazzi F, Ficorella F, Collini A, Margesin B (2013a) Influence of temperature on the actuation voltage of RF-MEMS switches. Microelectron Reliab 53:706–711. doi: 10.1016/j.microrel.2013.01.007 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Mulloni V, Colpo S, Faes A, Margesin B (2013b) A simple analytical method for residual stress measurement on suspended MEM structures using surface profilometry. J Micromech Microeng 23:025025. doi: 10.1088/0960-1317/23/2/025025 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Mulloni V, Resta G, Margesin B (2014a) Clear evidence of mechanical deformation in RF-MEMS switches during prolonged actuation. J Micromech Microeng 24:075003. doi: 10.1088/0960-1317/24/7/075003 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Mulloni V, Solazzi F, Resta G, Giacomozzi F, Margesin B (2014b) RF-MEMS switch design optimization for long-term reliability. Analog Integr Circuits Signal Process 78:323–332. doi: 10.1007/s10470-013-0220-x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. O’Mahony C, Olszewski O, Hill R, Houlihan R, Ryan C, Rodgers K, Kelleher C, Duane R, Hill M (2014) Reliability assessment of MEMS switches for space applications: laboratory and launch testing. J Micromech Microeng 24:125009. doi: 10.1088/0960-1317/24/12/125009 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Rebeiz GM, Muldavin BJ (2001) RF MEMS switches and switch circuits. IEEE Microw Mag 2:59–71. doi: 10.1109/6668.969936 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Ryan C, Olszewski Z, Houlihan R, O’Mahony C, Duane R (2014) A simple electrical test method to isolate viscoelasticity and creep in capacitive microelectromechanical switches. Appl Phys Lett 104:061908. doi: 10.1063/1.4865584 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Senturia SD (2001) Microsystem design. Springer Science, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  14. Van Spengen WM (2012) Capacitive RF MEMS switch dielectric charging and reliability: a critical review with recommendations. J Micromech Microeng 22:074001. doi: 10.1088/0960-1317/22/7/074001 CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Fondazione Bruno Kessler, Centro Materiali e MicrosistemiTrentoItaly

Personalised recommendations