Abstract
When photoresist structures are formed by employing various lithography technologies and followed by thermal reflow treatments, the mechanism that transforms the cross-section of a photoresist structure from a rectangular-shape into a circular-shape is seen as an integral constituent of the manufacturing method of microlens arrays. However, in the case, where a residual layer is absent, a photoresist film is completely exposed to the oncoming radiation down to the interface between the photoresist film and substrate. Even in the presence of a residual layer, it has been uncertain to the author if a photoresist structure with a circular cross-sectional shape could be obtained, and be made applicable for the fabrication of a microlens array. The author then executed a set of thermal reflow treatments under various conditions using a positive-tone photoresist AZP4903 known for its capability of forming relatively thick films. As a result, it became clear that the existence of a photoresist’s residual layer has large influence on the transformation of the cross-sectional shapes of photoresist structures. These observations can be attributed to whether the bottom surface of a photoresist structure is firmly fixed on a hard substrate, or if it happens to be in contact with a soft photoresist layer which can flow comparatively freely.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Abgrall P, Conedera V, Camon H, Gue AM, Nguyen NT (2007) SU-8 as a structural material for labs-on-chips and microelectromechanical systems. Electrophoresis 28:4539. doi:10.1002/elps.200700333
Ashby MF (2005) Materials selection in mechanical design, 4th edn. Elsevier, Burlington
Atencia J, Barnes S, Douglas J, Meacham M, Locascio LE (2007) Using pattern homogenization of binary grayscale masks to fabricate microfluidic structures with 3D topography. Lab Chip 7:1567. doi:10.1039/B709369A
Beuret C, Racine GA, Gobet J, Luthier R, de Rooji NF (1994) Microfabrication of 3D multidirectional inclined structures by UV lithography and electroplating. In: Proc. of IEEE workshop on IEEE micro electro mechanical systems an investigation of micro structures, sensors, actuators, machines and robotic systems. doi: 10.1109/MEMSYS.1994.555602
Buraschi MI, Bacci L, De Santi G (1989) Optical-diffraction-based modulation of photoresist profile for microlithography applications. Opt Eng 28:286654. doi:10.1117/12.7977016
Chang S-II, Yoon J (2006) A 3-D planar microlens for and effective monolithic optical interconnection system. IEEE Photonics Technol Lett 18:814. doi:10.1109/LPT.2006.871840
Chaudhuri B, Guckel H, Klein J, Fischer K (1998) Photoresist application for the LIGA process. Microsyst Technol 4:159. doi:10.1007/s005420050121
Cheng Y, Huang T, Chieng C-C (2002) Thick-film lithography using lase write. Microsyst Technol 9:17. doi:10.1007/s00542-002-0201-y
Che-Ping L, Hsuharng Y, Ching-Kong C (2003) A new microlens array fabrication method using UV proximity printing. J Micromech Microeng 13:748. doi:10.1088/0960-1317/13/5/330
Daly D (2001) Microlens arrays. Taylor & Francis, London
del Campo A, Greiner C (2007) SU-8: a photoresist for high-aspect-ration and 3D submicron lithography. J Micromech Microeng 17:R81. doi:10.1088/0960-1317/17/6/R01
Heremans P, Genoe J, Kujik M, Vounchx R, Borghs G (1997) Mushroom microlenses: optimized microlenses by reflow of multiple layers of photoresist. IEEE Photonics Technol Lett 9:1367. doi:10.1109/68.623265
Lorenz H, Despont M, Fahrni N, LaBianca N, Renaud P, Vettiger P (1997) SU-8: a low-cost negative resist for MEMS. J Micromech Microeng 7:121. doi:10.1088/0960-1317/7/7/010
Mekaru H, Koizumi O, Ueno A, Takahashi M (2010) Inclination of mold patter’s sidewalls by combined technique with photolithography at defocus-positions and electroforming. Microsyst Technol 16:1323. doi:10.1007/s00542-009-0983-2
Morgan B, Waits CM, Krizmanic J, Chodssi R (2004) Development of a deep silicon phase Fresnel lens using Gray-scale lithography and deep reactive ion etching. J Microelectromech Syst 13:113. doi:10.1109/JMEMS.2003.823220
Morgan B, Hua X, Lguchi T, Tomioka T, Oehrlein GS, Ghodssi R (2006) Substrate interconnect technolories for 3-D MEMS packaging. Microelectron Eng 81:106. doi:10.1016/j.mee.2005.04.004
Roy E, Voisin B, Gravel J-F, Peytavi R, Boudreau D, Veres T (2009) Microlens array fabrication by enhanced thermal reflow process: towards efficient collection of fluorescence light from microarrays. Microelectron Eng 86:2255. doi:10.1016/j.mee.2009.04.001
Somekh S (1976) Introduction to ion and plasma etching. J Vac Sci Technol 13:1003. doi:10.1116/1.569036
Stevens R, Miyashita T (2010) Review of standards for microlenses and microlens arrays. Imaging Sci J 58:202. doi:10.1179/136821910X12651933390746
Thorsen T, Roberts RW, Arnold FH, Quake SR (2001) Dynamic pattern formation in a vesicle-generating microfluidic device. Phys Rev Lett 86:4163. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.86.4163
Totsu K, Fujishiro K, Tanaka S, Esashi M (2006) Fabrication of three-dimensional microstructure using maskless gray-scale lithography. Sens Actuators A, Phys 130–131:387. doi:10.1016/j.sna.2005.12.008
Waits CM, Ghodssi R, Ervin MH, Dubey M (2001) MEMS-based gray-scale lithography. In: Proc. of 2001 international semiconductor device research symposium. doi: 10.1109/ISDRS.2001.984470
Yang H, Chao C, Lin C, Shen S (2004) Micro-ball lens array modeling and fabrication using thermal reflow in two polymer layers. J Micromech Microeng 14:277. doi:10.1088/0960-1317/14/2/016
Zaidi SH, Brueck SRJ (1988) High aspect-ratio holographic photoresist gratings. Appl Opt 27:2999. doi:10.1364/AO.27.002999
Acknowledgments
Before the author used the laser lithography system, the author received technical advices from Dr. Kenta Suzuki and Dr. Hiroshi Hiroshima of the National Institute of Advanced Industrial Science and Technology (AIST).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Mekaru, H. Influence of residual layer on cross-sectional shape of thermal-reflowed photoresist structures. Microsyst Technol 22, 329–336 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00542-014-2389-z
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00542-014-2389-z