Abstract
This study investigates variability in the topography of SU-8 photoresist subject to surface roughening by oxygen plasma treatment. Surface roughness (expressed as root mean square deviation from the mean) under the range of experimental conditions varied from 8 nm for an untreated baseline to as high as 472 nm. At 200 W RF-power and 200 mTorr chamber pressure, the mean surface roughness was 295 nm with standard deviation less than 10 nm across the specimen and 15 nm across the plasma chamber. The standard deviation in surface roughness at higher power and pressure combinations including 500 W and 800 mTorr was as high as 80 nm, with mean surface roughness less than 200 nm. Replicate runs under identical conditions revealed that run-to-run repeatability can be compromised by chamber conditions, evidenced by second runs having higher standard deviation by nearly 20 % over first runs without intermediate chamber cleaning.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Abgrall P, Conedera V, Camon H, Gue A, Nguyen NT (2007) SU-8 as a structural material for labs-on-chips and microelectromechanical systems. Electrophoresis 28:4539–4551. doi:10.1002/elps.200700333
Chan CM, Ko TM, Hiraoka H (1996) Polymer surface modification by plasmas and photons. Surf Sci Rep 24:1–54. doi:10.1016/0167-5729(96)80003-3
Chang T, Tsai T, Yang H, Huang J (2012) “Effect of ultra-fast laser texturing on surface wettability of microfluidic channels”, Microelectronic Engineering; Special issue MNE 2011—Part II, vol 98, no 0, pp 684–688. doi:10.1016/j.mee.2012.05.057
Cheong FC et al (2007) Direct removal of SU-8 using focused laser writing. App Phys A Mater Sci Process 87:71–76. doi:10.1007/s00339-006-3846-z
Collaud M, Groening P, Nowak S, Schlapbach L (1994) Plasma treatment of polymers: the effect of the plasma parameters on the chemical, physical, and morphological states of the polymer surface and on the metal-polymer interface. J Adhes Sci Technol 8:1115–1127. doi:10.1163/156856194X00979
Duffy DC, McDonald JC, Schueller OJA, Whitesides GM (1998) Rapid prototyping of microfluidic systems in poly(dimethylsiloxane). Anal Chem 70:4974–4984. doi:10.1021/ac980656z
Erickson D, Li D (2004) Integrated microfluidic devices. Anal Chim Acta 507:11–26. doi:10.1016/j.aca.2003.09.019
Gottscho RA, Jurgensen CW, Vitkavage DJ (1992) Microscopic uniformity in plasma etching. J Vac Sci Technol B Microelectron Process Phenom 10:2133–2147. doi:10.1116/1.586180
Hong G, Holmes AS, Heaton ME (2004) SU8 resist plasma etching and its optimisation. Microsyst Technol 10:357–359. doi:10.1007/s00542-004-0413-4
Joshi M, Kale N, Lal R, Ramgopal Rao V, Mukherji S (2007) A novel dry method for surface modification of SU-8 for immobilization of biomolecules in bio-MEMS. Biosens Bioelectron 22:2429–2435. doi:10.1016/j.bios.2006.08.045
Lai J, Sunderland B, Xue J, Yan S, Zhao W, Folkard M, Wang Y (2006) Study on hydrophilicity of polymer surfaces improved by plasma treatment. Appl Surf Sci 252:3375–3379. doi:10.1016/j.apsusc.2005.05.038
Lee C, Hsu W (2003) Method on surface roughness modification to alleviate stiction of microstructures. J Vac Sci Technol B Microelectron Nanom Struct 21:1505–1510. doi:10.1116/1.1592809
Li G, Zhang X, Kawi S (1999) Relationships between sensitivity, catalytic activity, and surface areas of SnO2 gas sensors. Sens Actuators B Chem 60:64–70. doi:10.1016/S0925-4005(99)00245-2
Lorenz H, Despont M, Fahrni N, LaBianca N, Renaud P, Vettiger P (1997) SU-8: a low-cost negative resist for MEMS. J Micromech Microeng 7:121–124. doi:10.1088/0960-1317/7/3/010
Melai J, Salm C, Smits S, Blanco Carballo VM, Schmitz J, Hageluken B (2007) Considerations on using SU-8 as a construction material for high aspect ratio structures. Paper presented at the 10th Annual Workshop on Semiconductor Advances for Future Electronics and Sensors (SAFE), pp 529–534
Nabesawa H, Hitobo T, Wakabayashi S, Asaji T, Abe T, Seki M (2008) Polymer surface morphology control by reactive ion etching for microfluidic devices. Sens Actuators B Chem 132:637–643. doi:10.1016/j.snb.2008.01.050
Natrajan V, Christensen K (2010) The impact of surface roughness on flow through a rectangular microchannel from the laminar to turbulent regimes. Microfluid Nanofluid 9:95–121. doi:10.1007/s10404-009-0526-2
Palumbo F, Mundo DR, Cappelluti D, d’Agostino R (2011) Superhydrophic and supershydrophilic polycarbonate by tailoring chemistry and nano-texture with plasma processing. Plasma Process Polym 8:118–126. doi:10.1002/ppap.201000098
Prentner S, Allen D, Larcombe L, Marson S, Jenkins K, Saumer M (2010) Effects of channel surface finish on blood flow in microfluidic devices. Microsyst Technol 16:091–1096. doi:10.1007/s00542-009-1004-1
Qiao R (2007) Effects of molecular level surface roughness on electroosmotic flow. Microfluid Nanofluid 3:33–38. doi:10.1007/s10404-006-0103-x
Shadpour H, Allbritton LN (2010) In situ roughening of polymeric microstructures. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces 2:1086–1093. doi:10.1021/am900860s
Stalder AF, Kulik G, Sage G, Barbieri L, Hoffmann P (2006) A snake-based approach to accurate determination of both contact points and contact angles. Colloids Surf A Physicochem Eng Aspects 286(1–3):92–103
Tominaka S, Nakamura Y, Osaka T (2010) Nanostructured catalyst with hierarchical porosity and large surface area for on-chip fuel cells. J Power Sour 195:1054–1058. doi:10.1016/j.jpowsour.2009.08.082
Tserepi A, Gogolides E, Constantoudis V, Cordoyiannis G, Raptis I, Valamontes ES (2003) Surface roughness induced by plasma etching of si-containing polymers. J Adhes Sci Technol 17:1083–1091
Tsougeni K, Petrou PS, Tserepi A, Kakabakos SE, Gogolides E (2011) Plasma nanotextured polystyrene for intense DNA microarrays. Procedia Eng 25:1573–1576
Tsougeni K, Petrou PS, Papageorgiou DP, Kakabakos SE, Tserepi A, Gogolides E (2012) Controlled protein adsorption on microfluidic channels with engineered roughness and wettability. Sensors Actuators B Chem 161:216–222
Ullal SJ, Singh H, Daugherty J, Vahedi V, Aydil ES (2009) Maintaining reproducible plasma reactor wall conditions: SF6 plasma etching of films deposited on chamber walls during Cl2/O2 plasma etching of Si. J Vac Sci Technol A Vac Surf Films 20(4):1195–1201. doi:10.1116/1.1479733
Waghmare PR, Mitra SK (2008) Investigation of combined electro-osmotic and pressure-driven flow in rough microchannels. J Fluid Eng Trans ASME 130:061204–061210. doi:10.1115/1.2928333
Wagterveld RM, Berendsen CWJ, Bouaidat S, Jonsmann J (2006) Ultralow hysteresis superhydrophobic surfaces by excimer laser modification of SU-8. Langmuir 22:10904–10908. doi:10.1021/la0620298
Walther F, Heckl WM, Stark RW (2008) Evaluation of nanoscale roughness measurements on a plasma treated SU-8 polymer surface by atomic force microscopy. Appl Surf Sci 254:7290–7295. doi:10.1016/j.apsusc.2008.05.323
Williams JA, Le HR (2006) Tribology and MEMS. J Phys D Appl Phys 39:R201–R214. doi:10.1088/0022-3727/39/12/R01
Wu T, Suzuki H, Yomo T (2011) Bio-inspired 3D self-patterning of functional coatings for PDMS microdluidics. Transducers 2311–2314. doi: 10.1109/TRANSDUCERS.2011.5969541
Yang D, Liu Y (2008) Numerical simulation of electroosmotic flow in microchannels with sinusoidal roughness. Coll Surf A Physicochem Eng Aspects 328:28–33. doi:10.1016/j.colsurfa.2008.06.029
Young PL, Kandlikar SG (2008) Surface roughness effects on heat transfer in microscale single phase flow: a critical review. In: Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Nanochannels, Microchannels, and Minichannels, ICNMM2008, June 2008, pp 189–201
Zhang X, Yu S, He Z, Miao Y (2004) Wetting of rough surfaces. Surf Rev Lett 11:7–13. doi:10.1142/S0218625X04005925
Zhang J, Zhou WX, Chan-Park M, Conner SR (2005) Argon plasma modification of SU-8 for very high aspect ratio and dense copper electroforming. J Electrochem Soc 152:716–721. doi:10.1149/1.2034519
Acknowledgments
This work was supported by Defense Microelectronics Activity Cooperative Agreement #H94003-08-2-0806.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Oruganti, N., Goedert, M. & Lee, SJ.J. Process variability in surface roughening of SU-8 by oxygen plasma. Microsyst Technol 19, 971–978 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00542-012-1680-0
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00542-012-1680-0