This work presents a study of a passive micromixer with lateral obstructions along a microchannel. The mixing process is simulated by solving the continuity, momentum and diffusion equations. The mixing performance is quantified in terms of a parameter called ‘mixing efficiency’. A comparison of mixing efficiencies with and without obstructions clearly indicates the benefit of having obstructions along the microchannel. The numerical model was validated by comparing simulation results with experimental results for a micromixer. An extensive parametric study was carried out to investigate the influence of the geometrical and operational parameters in terms of the mixing efficiency and pressure drop, which are two important criteria for the design of micromixers. A very interesting observation reveals that there exists a critical Reynolds number (Re cr ~ 100) below which the mixing process is diffusion dominated and thus the mixing efficiency is reduced with increase in Re and above which the mixing process is advection dominated and mixing efficiency increases with increase in Re. Microchannels with symmetric and staggered protrusion arrangements were studied and compared. The mixing performance of the staggered arrangement was comparable with that of symmetric arrangement but the pressure drop was lower in the case of staggered arrangements making it more suitable.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.
Buy single article
Instant access to the full article PDF.
Price includes VAT for USA
Subscribe to journal
Immediate online access to all issues from 2019. Subscription will auto renew annually.
This is the net price. Taxes to be calculated in checkout.
Bao HH, Zhong J, Yi M (2001) A minute magneto hydro dynamic (MHD) mixer. Sensor Actuat B-Chem 79:207–215
Bertsch A, Heimgartner S, Cousseau P, Renaud P (2001) Static micromixers based on large-scale industrial mixer geometry. Lab Chip 1:56–60
Chung YC, Hsu YL, Jen CP, Lu MC, Lin YC (2004) Design of passive mixers utilizing microfluidic self-circulation in the mixing chamber. Lab Chip 4:70–77
Ehrfeld W, Golbig K, Hessel V, we Lo H, Richter T (1999) Characterization of mixing in micromixers by a test reaction: single mixing units and mixing arrays. Ind Eng Chem Res 38:1075–1082
Erbacher C, Bessoth FG, Busch M, Verpoorte E, Manz A (1999) Towards integrated continuous-flow chemical reactors. Mikrochim Acta 131:19–24
Evans J, Liepmann D, Pisano AP (1997) Planar laminar mixer. Proceedings of the 10th IEEE international workshop on micro electro mechanical systems (MEMS’97), Nagoya, Japan, pp 96–101
Gobby D, Angeli P, Gavriilidis A (2001) Mixing characteristics of T-type microfluidic mixers. J Micromech Microeng 11:126–132
Handique K, Burns MA (2001) Mathematical modeling of drop mixing in a slit-type microchannel. J Micromech Microeng 11:548–554
Hong CC, Choi JW, Ahn CH (2004) A novel in-plane microfluidic mixer with modified tesla structures. Lab Chip 4:109–113
Howell PB, Mott DR, Golden JP, Ligler FS (2004) Design and evaluation of a Dean vortex-based micromixer Miniaturisation for Chemistry. Biol Bioeng 4:663–669
Jen CP, Wu CY, Lin YC, Wu CY (2003) Design and simulation of the micromixer with chaotic advection in twisted microchannels. Lab Chip 3:77–81
Kamholz AE, Weigl BH, Finlayson BA, Yager P (1999) Quantitative analysis of molecular interaction in a microfluidic channel: the T-sensor. Anal Chem 71:5340–5347
Koch M, Chatelain D, Evans G, Brunnschweiler A (1998) Two simple micromixers based on silicon. J Micromech Microeng 8:123–126
Koch M, Witt H, Evans G, Brunnschweiler A (1999) Improved characterization technique for micromixers. J Micromech Microeng 9:156–158
Lee YK, Deval J, Ho CM, Tabeling P (2001) Chaotic mixing in electrokinetically and pressure driven micro flows. Proc. MEMS’01, 14th IEEE Int. workshop micro electromechanical system (Interlaken, Switzerland) 483–486
Liu H, Lenigk R, Druyor-Sanchez RL, Yang J, Grodzinski P (2003) Hybridization enhancement using cavitation microstreaming. Anal Chem 75:1911–1917
Lu LH, Ryu KS, Liu C (2002) A magnetic microstirrer and array for microfluidic mixing. J Microelectromech Syst 11:462–469
Miyake R, Lammerink TSJ, Elwenspoek M, Fluitman JHJ (1993) Micro mixer with fast diffusion. Proceedings of the 6th IEEE int workshop on MEMS’93. Fort Lauderdale, Florida, pp 248–253
Nguyen NT, Wu Z (2005) Micromixers—a review. J Micromech Microeng 15:R1–R16
Oddy MH, Santiago JG, Mikkelsen JC (2001) Electrokinetic instability micromixing. Anal Chem 73:5822–5832
Sahu PK, Golia A, Sen AK (2012) Analytical, numerical and experimental investigations of mixing fluids in microchannel. Microsyst Technol 18:823–832
Schwesinger N, Frank T, Wurmus H (1996) A modular Microfluid system with an integrated micromixer. J Micromech Microeng 6:99–102
Tsai JH, Lin L (2002) Active microfluidic mixer and gas bubble filter driven by thermal bubble micropump. Sensor Actuat A-Phys 97–98:665–671
Virk MS, Holdo AE (2008) Numerical analysis of fluid mixing in T-type micro mixer. Int J Multiphys 2(1):107–127
Wang P, Harvey E, Masood S (2002) Optimizing layout of obstacles for enhanced mixing in microchannels. Smart Mater Strut 11:662–667
Wang J, Feng L, Ottino JM, Lueptow R (2009) Inertial effects on chaotic advection and mixing in a 2D cavity flow. Ind Eng Chem Res 48:2436–2442
Yang Z, Goto H, Matsumoto M, Maeda R (2001) Ultrasonic micromixer for microfluidic systems. Sensor Actuator A-Phys 93:266–272
Yang JT, Huang KJ, Lin YC (2005) Geometric effects on fluid mixing in passive grooved micromixers. Lab Chip 10:1140–1147
The authors would like to acknowledge the Science and Engineering Research Council (SERC), Department of Science and Technology (DST), India for providing financial support for the project.
About this article
Cite this article
Sahu, P.K., Golia, A. & Sen, A.K. Investigations into mixing of fluids in microchannels with lateral obstructions. Microsyst Technol 19, 493–501 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00542-012-1617-7
- Pressure Drop
- Microfluidic Chip
- Critical Reynolds Number
- Active Mixer
- Symmetric Arrangement