Advertisement

Microsystem Technologies

, Volume 14, Issue 9–11, pp 1317–1323 | Cite as

Effect of baffle height and Reynolds number on fluid mixing

  • C. K. ChungEmail author
  • C.-Y. Wu
  • T. R. Shih
Technical Paper

Abstract

In this paper, both numerical simulation and experiment were performed to investigate the mixing process within mixing chambers of the planar micromixer with three baffles at varied baffle height. The presence of three baffles causes the flow to separate and creates the recirculation and back flow within mixing chambers. The fluid mixing was greatly influenced by the baffle height and Reynolds number (Re) related to the size of recirculation zone. Larger baffle height or Re produces larger recirculation zone and convective mixing. The micromixer with 350 μm high baffles in 400 μm wide channel results in over 95% mixing at Re = 80 from the simulation results. The experiment results confirm the above simulation results qualitatively. This planar micromixer has the merits of simple design and easy fabrication as compared to the three-dimensional passive micromixers.

Keywords

PDMS Pressure Loss Master Mold Image Capture System Passive Micromixers 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Notes

Acknowledgments

This work is partial sponsored by National Science Council (NSC) under contract No NSC 94-2212-E-006-055. We pay our great thanks to the Center for Micro/Nano Science and Technology (CMNST) in National Cheng Kung University for the access of process and analysis equipments. We would also like to thank National Center for High-performing Computing (NCHC) for providing a computational fluid dynamics software in this work.

References

  1. Bau HH, Zhong J, Yi M (2001) A minute magneto hydro dynamic (MHD) mixer. Sens Actuators B Chem 79:207–215CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bhaqat A, Peterson ET, Papautky L (2006) Passive micromixer with break-up obstructions. In: Proceedings of SPIE Microfluidics, BioMEMS, and Medical Microsystems Conference, SPIE 6112, 61120JGoogle Scholar
  3. Bhaqat AS, Daqani G, Peterson ETK, Papautky L (2005) Passive micromixer with obstructions for Lab-on-a-chip applications. In: Proceedings of SPIE Microfluidics, BioMEMS, and Medical Microsystems Conference, SPIE 5718, pp 291–297Google Scholar
  4. Bökenkamp D, Desai A, Yang X, Tai YC, Marzluff EM, Mayo SL (1998) Microfabricated silicon mixers for submillisecond quench-flow analysis. Anal Chem 70:232–236CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Cha J, Kim J, Ryu SK, Park J, Jeong Y, Park S, Park S, Kim HC, Chun K (2006) A highly efficient 3D micromixer using soft PDMS bonding. J Micromech Microeng 16:1778–1782CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Engler M, Föll C, Kockmann N, Woias P (2003) Investigations of liquid mixing in static micro mixers. In: Proceedings of the 11th European Conference on Mixing, pp 277–284Google Scholar
  7. Hardt S, Drese KS, Hessel V, Schőnfeld F (2005) Passive micromixers for applications in the microreactor and μTAS fields. Microfluid Nanofluid 1:108–118CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Kockmann N, Föll C, Woias P (2003) Flow regimes and mass transfer characteristics in static micro mixers. In: Proceedings of the SPIE Photonics West, micromachining and microfabrication, SPIE 4982, pp 319–329Google Scholar
  9. Lee S, Lee HY, Lee IF, Tseng CY (2004) Ink diffusion in water. Eur J Phys 25:331–336CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Liu RH, Stremler MA, Sharp KV, Olsen MG, Santiago JG, Adrian RJ, Aref H, Beebe DJ (2001) Passive mixing in three-dimensional serpentine microchannel. J Microelectromech Syst 19:190–196Google Scholar
  11. Lu LH, Ryu KS, Liu C (2002) A magnetic microstirrer and array for microfluidic mixing. J Microelectromech Syst 11:462–469CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Mengeaud V, Josserand J, Girault HH (2002) Mixing processes in a zigzag microchannel: finite element simulations and optical study. Anal Chem 74:4279–4286CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Mousavi SS, Hooman K (2006) Heat and fluid flow in entrance region of a channel with staggered baffles. Energy Conv Manag 47:2011–2019CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Nguyen NT, Wu Z (2005) Micromixers—a review. J Micromech Microeng 15:R1–R16CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Santos NB, Lemos MJS De (2006) Flow and heat transfer in a parallel plate channel with porous and solid baffles. Numer Heat Tranf A-Appl 49:471–494CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Vivek V, Zeng Y, Kim ES (2000) Novel acoustic-wave micromixer. In: Proceedings of the IEEE 13th International Conference on Micro Electro Mechanical Systems (MEMS), pp 668–673Google Scholar
  17. Wang H, Lovenitti P, Masood S (2002) Optimizing layout of obstacles for enhanced mixing in microchannels. Smart Mater Struct 11:662–667CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Xia HM, Wan SYM, Shu C, Chew YT (2005) Chaotic micromixers using two-layer crossing channels to exhibit fast mixing at low Reynolds numbers. Lab Chip 5:748–755CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Yamaguchi Y, Ogino K, Yamashita K, Maeda H (2004) Rapid micromixing based on multilayer laminar flows. J Chem Eng Jpn 37:1265–1270CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Mechanical Engineering, Center for Micro/Nano Science and TechnologyNational Cheng Kung UniversityTainanTaiwan, ROC

Personalised recommendations