Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Differences in the assessment of postoperative pain when evaluated by patients and doctors

  • Original Articles
  • Published:
Journal of Anesthesia Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This study was undertaken to compare the assessment of pain intensity by 59 patients and by their doctors according to a visual analogue scale (VAS) at rest and when coughing at 5 and 20 hr after major abdominal surgery. The rating given by the patients, who received epidural analgesia to relieve postoperative palnvwas significantly above, and moreover, significantly correlated with that given by the doctors at any time or under any condition of the assessment. However, the correlation between the ratings given by patients and doctors at rest at 5 hr after surgery was low (r=0.39, rs=0.38) and significantly different from that when coughing at 20 hr after the operation (r=0.79, rs=0.80). Our findings indicate that the assessment of postoperative pain may be associated with some unreliability, especially during early periods, when using the subjective or objectiverated VAS at rest separately, and thus requires the combined use or the concomitant use of the VAS when coughing. Substitutional use of the objective-rated VAS for the subjective-rated VAS is not advised.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Scott J, Huskisson EC: Graphic representation of pain. Pain 2:175–184, 1976

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Ohnhaus EE, Adler R: Methodological problems in the measurement of pain: a comparison between the verbal rating scale and the visual analogue scale. Pain 1: 379–384, 1975

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Revill SI, Robinson JO, Rosen M, et al: The reliability of a linear analogue for evaluating pain. Anaesthesia 31:1191–1198, 1976

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Shulman M, Sandler AN, Bradley JW, et al: Postthoracotomy pain and pulmonary function following epidural and systemic morphine. Anesthesiology 61:569–575, 1984

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Chrubasik J, Wiemers K: Continuousplus-on-demand epidural infusion of morphine for postoperative pain relief by means of a small, externally worn infusion device. Anesthesiology 62:263–267, 1985

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Forrest M, Hermann G, Andersen B: Assessment of pain: a comparison between patients and doctors. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 33:255–256, 1989

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Forrest M, Andersen B: Ordinal scale and statistics in medical research. Br Med J 292:537–538, 1986

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Hodgkins M, Albert D, Daltroy L: Comparing patients’ and their physicians’ assessments of pain. 23:273-277, 1985

  9. Scott LE, Clum GA, Peoples JB: Preoperative predictors of postoperative pain. Pain 15:283–293, 1983

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Martinez-Urrutia A: Anxiety and pain in surgical patients. J Consult Clin Psychol 43:437–442, 1975

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Woodrow KM, Friedman GD, Siegelaub AB: Pain tolerance: Differences according to age, sex and race. Psychosom Med 34:548–556, 1972

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Carlsson AM: Assessment of chronic pain. I. Aspects of the reliability and validity of the visual analogue scale. Pain 16:87–101, 1983

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

About this article

Cite this article

Sakura, S., Nonoue, T., Nomura, T. et al. Differences in the assessment of postoperative pain when evaluated by patients and doctors. J Anesth 7, 287–292 (1993). https://doi.org/10.1007/s0054030070287

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s0054030070287

Key words

Navigation