Skip to main content
Log in

Dose-response relation and time course of

  • Original Articles
  • Published:
Journal of Anesthesia Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The dose-response relation of pipecuronium, the time course of its neuromuscular blocking effects, and the reversibility of the residual block by neostigmine have been investigated in patients under sevofluraney N2O Anesthesia using a neuromuscular transmission analyzer (Accelograph®, Biometer, Denmark). After an initial dose of pipecuronium (0.04 mg·kg−1, i.v., the maximum block rate, onset time, the time from administration until 25% recovery and 50% recovery of control twitch height of the first response to train-of-four nerve stimulation and the interval time of administration of maintenance dose (0.005 mg·kg−1, i.v.) were 93.7±7.68%, 5.0±1.84, 55.4 ±23.92,73.0±29.44 and 38.7±15.50 minutes, respectively. The average intubation score (excellent; 0, good; 1 fair; 2, poor; 3) was 0.63±0.56 at the level of 95.88±5.06% block. Neostigmine (1.5 mg) promptly reversed the residual neuromuscular blockade induced by pipecuronium (reversal time: 10.1±2.98 minutes). No side effects attributable to pipecuronium was seen in this study.

In conclusion, pipecuronium is a very useful nondepolarizing neuromuscular blocking agent especially for moderately long surgical procedure over 4–5 hours.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Agoston S, Wierda JMKH, Swen J: The clinical pharmacology of pipecuronium bromide. Neuromuscular blocking agents: past, present and future, Excepta Medica, Amsterdam, 1990, pp. 137–147

  2. Maestrone E: Pipecuronium, pancuronium and alcuronium; dose-response relationships and clinical profiles. Neuromuscular blocking agents: past, present and future, Excepta Medica Amsterdam, 1990, pp. 148–160

  3. Zwölfer W, Schwarz S, Perger P, et al: Clinical comparison of the cardiovascular effects of pipecuronium bromide and pancuronium bromide in patients undergoing coronary artery bypass graft surgery. Neuromuscular blocking agents: past, present and future, Excepta Medica Amsterdam, 1990, pp. 161–167

  4. Ueda N, Muteki T, Poulsen A, et al: Clinical Assessment of a New Neuromuscular Transmission Monitoring System (ACCELOGRAPH®) — A comparison with the conventional method —. J Anesth 3:90–93, 1989

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Fahey MR, Morris RB, Miller RD, et al: Clinical pharmacology of Org NC45. Anesthesiology 55:6–11, 1981

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Viby-Mogensen J, Howardy-Hansen P, Chrremmer-Jorgensen B, et al: Posttetanic count (PTC); A new method of evaluating an intense nondepolarizing neuromuscular blockade. Anesthesiology 45:458–461, 1981

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Ueda N, Muteki T and Tsuda H: What Anesthesiologist Should Know about Neuromuscular Monitoring Today? J Anesth 6:192–206, 1992

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Inoue S, Veda N, Tsuda H, et al: Accelerated Reversal of Pancuronium Blockade with Divided Administration of Neostigmine. J Anesth 3:240–243, 1989

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Wierda JMKH, Richardson F J and Agoston S: Dose response relation and time course of pipecuronium bromide in humans anesthetized with nitrous oxide and isoflurane, halothane, or droperidol/fentanyl. Anesth Analg 69:208–213, 1989

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

About this article

Cite this article

Ueda, N., Masuda, Y., Muteki, T. et al. Dose-response relation and time course of. J Anesth 7, 151–156 (1993). https://doi.org/10.1007/s0054030070151

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s0054030070151

Key words

Navigation