Journal of Anesthesia

, Volume 6, Issue 4, pp 455–460 | Cite as

Effects of tilting in the sagittal plane on the cephalad spread of anesthesia

  • Shiro Oku
  • Tadao Shimizu
Original Articles


The effect of tilting in the sagittal plane on the spread of anesthesia was studied in 30 healthy male patients. Two ml of 0.3% hyperbaric dibucaine was used for intrathecal injection in the lateral position. After 3 min of resting on their side, 15 patients were placed in the horizontal supine position. Other 15 patients were turned to the contralateral side at 7–8 degrees in the sagittal plane. Cephalad spread of sensory analgesia by the pin-prick method, degree of motor blockade by Bromage score, mean atrerial pressure, and heart rate were assessed. Mean spread of sensory analgesia in the non-dependent side on the dural puncture was significantly higher in the sagittal-tilt group (T7.4 ±2.6 at 15 min) compared the horizontal group (T9.5±1.4 at 15 min). There was no significant difference in the mean cephalad spread of the analgesic level in the dependent side between the two groups. U nilateral motor anesthesia of the dependent side seemed to be canceled by the sagittal tilting maneuver. A 7 to 8 degree tilt in the sagittal plane is recommended to facilitate the cephalad spread of analgesia and to avoid unilateral anesthesia.

Key words

spinal anesthesia dibucaine unilateral anesthesia sagittal tilt 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    Sprague DH: Effects of position and uterine displacement on spinal anesthesia for Cesarean section. Anesthesiology 44:164–166, 1976CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Hanaoka K: Experience in the use of Hanaoka’s needle for spinalcontinuous epidural anaesthesia (500 cases). presented in the 7th Asian Australasian Congress of Anaesthesiologists, Hong Kong, 1986. Asia Pacific Congress series No 55, pp. 161.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Bromage PR: A comparison of the hydrochloride and carbon dioxide salts of lidocaine and prilocaine in epidural analgesia. Acta Anaesth Scand (suppl) 16:55–59, 1966Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Greene NM: Distribution of local anesthetic solutions within the subarachnoid space. Anesth Analg 64:715–730, 1985CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Janik R, Dick W, Stanton-Hicks Md’A: Effects of Trendelenberg position (0 vs. 10°) on the spread of hyperbaric bupivacaine and tetracaine. Regional Anesth 13:34–39, 1988Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Kitahara T, Kuri S, Yoshida J: The spread of drugs used for spinal anesthesia. Anesthesiology 29:60–64, 1968CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Smith TC: The lumbar spine and subarachnoid block. Anesthesiology 29:60–64, 1968CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    de’Jung RH: Cm- the mmimum anesthetic concentration, Physiology and Pharmacology of Local Anesthesia. Ed. de’Jung RH, Springfield, Charles C Thomas Publisher, 1970, pp. 87–96Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Japanese Society of Anesthesiologists 1992

Authors and Affiliations

  • Shiro Oku
    • 1
  • Tadao Shimizu
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of AnesthesiaSaiseikai-Tondabayashi HospitalTondabayashi, OsakaJapan

Personalised recommendations