Abstract
Thoracic sympathetic ganglion block is less effective than lumbar sympathetic ganglion block due to differences in the anatomical structure of these regions. Contrast radiographic findings and an analysis of the effects of lumbar sympathetic ganglion block have been reported, but there are few reports concerning thoracic sympathetic ganglion block. The relationship between contrast radiography findings and the effects of thoracic sympathetic ganglion block were studied in 131 block procedures which mainly had hyperhidrosis.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Ohseto K, Wakasugi B, Yuda Y: Technique of thoracic sympathetic ganglion block. Pain Clinic 7:805–810, 1988
Ohseto K: Thoracic sympathetic ganglion block. Pain Clinic, Edited by Wakasugi B. Tokyo, Igakushoin, 1988, pp. 25–39
White JC, Gentry RW: Radiographic control for paravertebral injection of alcohol in angina pectoris. J Neurosurg 1:40–44, 1943
Katz J, Renk H: Handbook of Thoracoabdominal Nerve Block. New York, Appleton & Lange/Prentice Hall, 1988, p 131
Dondelinger RF, Kurziel JC: Percutaneous phenol block of the upper thoracic sympathetic chain with computed tomography gidance. Acta Radiologica 28:511–515, 1987
Shiotani M, Wakasugi B: Chemical lumbar sympathectomy. Pain Clinic 8:317–324, 1987
Yamamuro M: Lumbar sympathetic ganglion alcohol block. Pain Clinic 8:308–316, 1987
Ohseto K, Wakasugi B, Yuda Y: Thoracic and lumbar sympathetic ganglion block for herpes zoster. Pain Clinic 7:485–488, 1988
Shiotani M, Wakasugi B: Hyperhidrosis. Medical Way 4:99–105, 1987
Naganuma Y, Shiotani M: Pain Clinic. Hyperhidrosis. Mebio 6:88–92, 1989
Pick J: The identification of sympathetic segments. Ann Surg 145:355–364, 1957
Heimut Ferner: Atlas of Topographical and Applied Human Anatomy, volume 2. Breast. Abdomen and Extremity, Baltimore, Urban & Schwarzenberg, 1980, pp. 138–142
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
About this article
Cite this article
Ohseto, K. Contrast radiography and effects of thoracic sympathetic ganglion block. J Anesth 5, 132–141 (1991). https://doi.org/10.1007/s0054010050132
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s0054010050132