Skip to main content
Log in

Uterotonic administration during cesarean section in Japan

  • Letter to the Editor
  • Published:
Journal of Anesthesia Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Data availability

The datasets generated and/or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

References

  1. Hasegawa J, Sekizawa A, Tanaka H, Katsuragi S, Osato K, Murakoshi T, Nakata M, Nakamura M, Yoshimatsu J, Sadahiro T, Kanayama N, Ishiwata I, Kinoshita K, Ikeda T. Maternal Death Exploratory Committee in Japan; Japan Association of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. Current status of pregnancy-related maternal mortality in Japan: a report from the maternal death exploratory committee in Japan. BMJ Open. 2016;6:e010304.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. Heesen M, Carvalho B, Carvalho JCA, Duvekot JJ, Dyer RA, Lucas DN, McDonnell N, Orbach-Zinger S, Kinsella SM. International consensus statement on the use of uterotonic agents during caesarean section. Anaesthesia. 2019;74:1305–19.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Kovacheva VP, Soens MA, Tsen LC. A Randomized, double-blinded trial of a “Rule of Threes” algorithm versus continuous infusion of oxytocin during elective cesarean delivery. Anesthesiology. 2015;123:92–100.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Terblanche NC, Otahal P, Sharman JE. A survey of anaesthetists on uterotonic usage practices for elective caesarean section in Australia and New Zealand. Anaesth Intensive Care. 2021;49:440–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Dennehy KC, Rosaeg OP, Cicutti NJ, Krepski B, Sylvain JP. Oxytocin injection after caesarean delivery: intravenous or intramyometrial? Can J Anaesth. 1998;45:635–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Akinaga C, Uchizaki S, Kurita T, Taniguchi M, Makino H, Suzuki A, Uchida T, Suzuki K, Itoh H, Tani S, Sato S, Terui K. Randomized double-blind comparison of the effects of intramyometrial and intravenous oxytocin during elective cesarean section. J Obstet Gynaecol Res. 2016;42:404–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Torloni MR, Siaulys M, Riera R, Martimbianco ALC, Pacheco RL, Latorraca COC, Widmer M, Betran AP. Route of oxytocin administration for preventing blood loss at caesarean section: a systematic review with meta-analysis. BMJ Open. 2021;11: e051793.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank Anahid Pinchis from Edanz (https://jp.edanz.com/ac) for editing a draft of this manuscript.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Satoshi Naruse.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of Interest

All authors do not have conflicts of interest.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary file1 (DOCX 14 KB)

Supplementary file2 (DOCX 13 KB)

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Naruse, S., Mazda, Y., Akinaga, C. et al. Uterotonic administration during cesarean section in Japan. J Anesth 37, 657–658 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00540-023-03194-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00540-023-03194-4

Keywords

Navigation