Skip to main content

Erector spinae plane block for back surgery

A Letter to the Editor to this article was published on 23 November 2021

The Original Article was published on 22 March 2021

To the Editor:

We read with great interest the article published by Yörükoğlu et al. in the Journal of Anesthesia [1]. They evaluated supplemental erector spinae plane block (ESPB) in patients with lumbar disc herniation undergoing microdiscectomy. They also compared the effectiveness of ESPB to that of standard anesthesia in terms of morphine use in the acute postoperative period. The results of this study were easy to understand and appropriately described. Ultrasound-guided ESPB is being increasingly used for multimodal management of perioperative pain all over the world [2].

The study by Yörükoğlu et al. raised a fundamental question: is there a need for bilateral ESPB during this back surgery? The study recruited 60 participants undergoing single-level lumbar microdiscectomy. Less invasive back surgery is preferable for early recovery and reduced pain. Advanced surgeries, such as full-endoscopic interlaminar lumbar discectomy, are performed under regional instead of general anesthesia [3]. Microdiscectomy involves peeling off the erector muscles from the vertebrae in the supine position under general anesthesia. However, surgical manipulation is limited to the side of the incision, which reduces the pain and invasiveness of the procedure. Conversely, standard fusion surgery requires bilateral surgical manipulation.

If ESPB is applied only on the surgical side, the dose of local anesthetic could be increased at this site without the local anesthetic toxicity. Increasing the anesthetic dose or the injection volume may result in wide the analgesic area (e.g., during multi-level ESPB) [4]. One of the most significant advantages of regional anesthesia is that the area and duration of analgesia can be modified by changing the anesthetic volume or using a supplemental catheter.

ESPB, a novel technique, may be appropriate for managing perioperative pain in patients undergoing lumbar spine surgery from the perspective of anatomical approaching [5]. Further studies are required to confirm the effectiveness and safety of ESPB.

References

  1. 1.

    Yörükoğlu HU, İçli D, Aksu C, Cesur S, Kuş A, Gürkan Y. Erector spinae block for postoperative pain management in lumbar disc hernia repair. J Anesth. 2021;35:420–5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    van den Broek RJC, van de Geer R, Schepel NC, Liu WY, Bouwman RA, Versyck B. Evaluation of adding the Erector spinae plane block to standard anesthetic care in patients undergoing posterior lumbar interbody fusion surgery. Sci Rep. 2021;11:7631.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    Ünsal UU, Şentürk S. Comparison of direct costs of percutaneous full-endoscopic interlaminar lumbar discectomy and microdiscectomy: results from Turkey. Ideggyogy Sz. 2021;74:197–205.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    Balaban O, Aydın T. Ultrasound guided bi-level erector spinae plane block for pain management in Herpes Zoster. J Clin Anesth. 2019;52:31–2.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    Liu MJ, Zhou XY, Yao YB, Shen X, Wang R, Shen QH. Postoperative analgesic efficacy of erector spinae plane block in patients undergoing lumbar spinal surgery: a review and meta-analysis. Pain Ther. 2021;10:333–47.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

None.

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Yushi U. Adachi.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no competing interest.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Satomoto, M., Adachi, Y.U. Erector spinae plane block for back surgery. J Anesth (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00540-021-03001-y

Download citation