Skip to main content

Long-term survival differences between sevoflurane and propofol use in general anesthesia for gynecologic cancer surgery

Abstract

Background

This study aimed to evaluate the influence of anesthetic management with propofol or sevoflurane on the prognosis of patients undergoing gynecologic cancer surgery.

Methods

This retrospective cohort study included patients who underwent gynecologic cancer (cervical, endometrial, and ovarian cancer) surgery between 2006 and 2018 at the National Hospital Organization Osaka National Hospital. Patients were grouped according to anesthesia type for maintenance of anesthesia: propofol or sevoflurane. After propensity score matching, Kaplan–Meier survival curves were constructed for overall survival, cancer-specific survival, and recurrence-free survival. Univariate and multivariate cox regression models were used to compare hazard ratios for recurrence-free survival.

Results

A total of 193 patients with propofol and 94 with sevoflurane anesthesia were eligible for analysis. After propensity score matching, 94 patients remained in each group. The sevoflurane group showed significantly lower survival rates than the propofol group with respect to 10-year overall survival (89.3% vs. 71.6%; p = 0.007), 10-year cancer-specific survival (91.0% vs 80.2%; p = 0.039), and 10-year recurrence-free survival (85.6% vs. 67.7%; p = 0.008). Sevoflurane anesthesia was identified as an independent risk factor for recurrence-free survival. Furthermore, distant recurrence was significantly more frequent in the sevoflurane group than in the propofol group (p < 0.001).

Conclusion

In patients undergoing gynecologic cancer surgery, sevoflurane anesthesia was associated with worse overall, cancer-specific, and recurrence-free survival than propofol anesthesia.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

References

  1. 1.

    Ferlay J, Colombet M, Soerjomataram I, Mathers C, Parkin DM, Piñeros M, et al. Estimating the global cancer incidence and mortality in 2018: GLOBOCAN sources and methods. Int J Cancer. 2019;144(8):1941–53.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    Shakhar G, Ben-Eliyahu S. Potential prophylactic measures against postoperative immunosuppression: could they reduce recurrence rates in oncological patients? Ann Surg Oncol. 2003;10(8):972–92.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    Goldfarb Y, Sorski L, Benish M, Levi B, Melamed R, Ben-Eliyahu S. Improving postoperative immune status and resistance to cancer metastasis: a combined perioperative approach of immunostimulation and prevention of excessive surgical stress responses. Ann Surg. 2011;253(4):798–810.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    van der Bij GJ, Oosterling SJ, Beelen RH, Meijer S, Coffey JC, van Egmond M. The perioperative period is an underutilized window of therapeutic opportunity in patients with colorectal cancer. Ann Surg. 2009;249(5):727–34.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    Gottschalk A, Sharma S, Ford J, Durieux ME, Tiouririne M. Review article: the role of the perioperative period in recurrence after cancer surgery. Anesth Analg. 2010;110(6):1636–43.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    Hiller JG, Hacking MB, Link EK, Wessels KL, Riedel BJ. Perioperative epidural analgesia reduces cancer recurrence after gastro-oesophageal surgery. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2014;58(3):281–90.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    Liljefors M, Nilsson B, Hjelm Skog AL, Ragnhammar P, Mellstedt H, Frödin JE. Natural killer (NK) cell function is a strong prognostic factor in colorectal carcinoma patients treated with the monoclonal antibody 17–1A. Int J Cancer. 2003;105(5):717–23.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    Koch M, Kienle P, Hinz U, Antolovic D, Schmidt J, Herfarth C, et al. Detection of hematogenous tumor cell dissemination predicts tumor relapse in patients undergoing surgical resection of colorectal liver metastases. Ann Surg. 2005;241(2):199–205.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    Melamed R, Bar-Yosef S, Shakhar G, Shakhar K, Ben-Eliyahu S. Suppression of natural killer cell activity and promotion of tumor metastasis by ketamine, thiopental, and halothane, but not by propofol: mediating mechanisms and prophylactic measures. Anesth Analg. 2003;97(5):1331–9.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    Buckley A, McQuaid S, Johnson P, Buggy DJ. Effect of anaesthetic technique on the natural killer cell anti-tumour activity of serum from women undergoing breast cancer surgery: a pilot study. Br J Anaesth. 2014;113(Suppl 1):i56-62.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    Ecimovic P, McHugh B, Murray D, Doran P, Buggy DJ. Effects of sevoflurane on breast cancer cell function in vitro. Anticancer Res. 2013;33(10):4255–60.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    Xu Y, Jiang W, Xie S, Xue F, Zhu X. The role of inhaled anesthetics in tumorigenesis and tumor immunity. Cancer Manag Res. 2020;12:1601–9.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  13. 13.

    Markovic-Bozic J, Karpe B, Potocnik I, Jerin A, Vranic A, Novak-Jankovic V. Effect of propofol and sevoflurane on the inflammatory response of patients undergoing craniotomy. BMC Anesthesiol. 2016;16:18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. 14.

    Inada T, Yamanouchi Y, Jomura S, Sakamoto S, Takahashi M, Kambara T, Shingu K. Effect of propofol and isoflurane anaesthesia on the immune response to surgery. Anaesthesia. 2004;59(10):954–9.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  15. 15.

    Kushida A, Inada T, Shingu K. Enhancement of antitumor immunity after propofol treatment in mice. Immunopharmacol Immunotoxicol. 2007;29(3–4):477–86.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  16. 16.

    Enlund M, Berglund A, Andreasson K, Cicek C, Enlund A, Bergkvist L. The choice of anaesthetic–sevoflurane or propofol–and outcome from cancer surgery: a retrospective analysis. Upsala J Med Sci. 2014;119(3):251–61.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. 17.

    Zheng X, Wang Y, Dong L, Zhao S, Wang L, Chen H, Xu Y, Wang G. Effects of propofol-based total intravenous anesthesia on gastric cancer: a retrospective study. Onco Targets Ther. 2018;11:1141–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. 18.

    Wigmore TJ, Mohammed K, Jhanji S. Long-term survival for patients undergoing volatile versus iv anesthesia for cancer surgery: a retrospective analysis. Anesthesiology. 2016;124(1):69–79.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  19. 19.

    Wu ZF, Lee MS, Wong CS, Lu CH, Huang YS, Lin KT, et al. Propofol-based total intravenous anesthesia is associated with better survival than desflurane anesthesia in colon cancer surgery. Anesthesiology. 2018;129(5):932–41.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  20. 20.

    Jun IJ, Jo JY, Kim JI, Chin JH, Kim WJ, Kim HR, Lee EH, Choi IC. Impact of anesthetic agents on overall and recurrence-free survival in patients undergoing esophageal cancer surgery: a retrospective observational study. Sci Rep. 2017;7(1):14020.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. 21.

    Shiono S, Shibata SC, Kabata D, Shintani A, Ikeda T, Fujino Y. Comparison of 1-year recurrence-free survival between sevoflurane and propofol use for general anesthesia management in primary breast cancer surgery. J Anesthesia. 2020;12:10–23.

    Google Scholar 

  22. 22.

    Oh TK, Kim K, Jheon S, Lee J, Do SH, Hwang JW, Song IA. Long-term oncologic outcomes for patients undergoing volatile versus intravenous anesthesia for non-small cell lung cancer surgery: a retrospective propensity matching analysis. Cancer Control J Moffitt Cancer Center. 2018;25(1):1073274818775360.

    Google Scholar 

  23. 23.

    Liu S, Gu X, Zhu L, Wu G, Zhou H, Song Y, et al. Effects of propofol and sevoflurane on perioperative immune response in patients undergoing laparoscopic radical hysterectomy for cervical cancer. Medicine. 2016;95(49):e5479.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  24. 24.

    Cho JS, Lee MH, Kim SI, Park S, Park HS, Oh E, et al. The effects of perioperative anesthesia and analgesia on immune function in patients undergoing breast cancer resection: a prospective randomized study. Int J Med Sci. 2017;14(10):970–6.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  25. 25.

    Takeuchi H, Maehara Y, Tokunaga E, Koga T, Kakeji Y, Sugimachi K. Prognostic significance of natural killer cell activity in patients with gastric carcinoma: a multivariate analysis. Am J Gastroenterol. 2001;96(2):574–8.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  26. 26.

    Seth R, Tai LH, Falls T, de Souza CT, Bell JC, Carrier M, et al. Surgical stress promotes the development of cancer metastases by a coagulation-dependent mechanism involving natural killer cells in a murine model. Ann Surg. 2013;258(1):158–68.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. 27.

    Xue F, Xu Y, Song Y, Zhang W, Li R, Zhu X. The effects of sevoflurane on the progression and cisplatinum sensitivity of cervical cancer cells. Drug Des Dev Ther. 2019;13:3919–28.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  28. 28.

    Jaura AI, Flood G, Gallagher HC, Buggy DJ. Differential effects of serum from patients administered distinct anaesthetic techniques on apoptosis in breast cancer cells in vitro: a pilot study. Br J Anaesth. 2014;113(Suppl 1):i63–7.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  29. 29.

    Xu YJ, Li SY, Cheng Q, Chen WK, Wang SL, Ren Y, et al. Effects of anaesthesia on proliferation, invasion and apoptosis of LoVo colon cancer cells in vitro. Anaesthesia. 2016;71(2):147–54.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  30. 30.

    Hirai T, Konishi Y, Mizuno S, Rui Z, Sun Y, Nishiwaki K. Differential effects of sevoflurane on the growth and apoptosis of human cancer cell lines. J Anesth. 2020;34(1):47–57.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. 31.

    Lennon FE, Moss J, Singleton PA. The μ-opioid receptor in cancer progression: is there a direct effect? Anesthesiology. 2012;116(4):940–5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. 32.

    Cata JP, Keerty V, Keerty D, Feng L, Norman PH, Gottumukkala V, et al. A retrospective analysis of the effect of intraoperative opioid dose on cancer recurrence after non-small cell lung cancer resection. Cancer Med. 2014;3(4):900–8.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  33. 33.

    Salicrú S, Gil-Moreno A, Montero A, Roure M, Pérez-Benavente A, Xercavins J. Laparoscopic radical hysterectomy with pelvic lymphadenectomy in early invasive cervical cancer. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2011;18(5):555–68.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. 34.

    Ishikawa M, Nishioka M, Hanaki N, Miyauchi T, Kashiwagi Y, Ioki H, et al. Perioperative immune responses in cancer patients undergoing digestive surgeries. World J Surg Oncol. 2009;7:7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgement

None.

Funding

Department funding only.

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Masaaki Miyo.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors have no conflicts of interest.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary file1 (DOC 221 KB)

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Takeyama, E., Miyo, M., Matsumoto, H. et al. Long-term survival differences between sevoflurane and propofol use in general anesthesia for gynecologic cancer surgery. J Anesth 35, 495–504 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00540-021-02941-9

Download citation

Keywords

  • Gynecologic cancer
  • General anesthesia
  • Prognosis
  • Sevoflurane
  • Propofol
  • Recurrence
  • Survival