Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Incidence and effects of postoperative migration of interscalene catheter tips placed using ultrasound-guided anterior and posterior approaches

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Journal of Anesthesia Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Continuous interscalene brachial plexus block (CISB) provides analgesia after shoulder surgery. However, even a catheter securely fixed at the insertion site may be susceptible to migration, precluding the block from working consistently. We examined to see if catheter tip migration would occur with no catheter-at-skin change after anterior and posterior approaches to CISB in patients undergoing shoulder surgery, and compared the incidence rate and pain scores between approaches and between catheters with and without tip migration, respectively.

Methods

Patients were randomly assigned to receive CISB using either anterior or posterior approach. Catheter tip was observed using a cross-sectional view. The rates of catheter tip migration with no catheter-at-skin change at 24 h after the two approaches were calculated and compared, and pain scores were compared between catheters with and without tip migration after each approach.

Results

Fifty-four patients were analyzed. Catheter tip migration occurred at 24 h at a similar rate after both approaches (anterior approach 40.7% versus posterior approach 33.3%, p = 0.78). Worst pain score was significantly higher for 24 h in patients whose catheter tip had migrated as compared with those whose catheter had not migrated after anterior (median [IQR] 53 [42–73] versus 18 [0–50], p = 0.003) and posterior approaches (median [IQR] 63 [57–81] versus 29 [3–47], p < 0.0001).

Conclusion

In patients undergoing shoulder surgery, an interscalene catheter tip can migrate after both anterior and posterior approaches at a similar rate, even if the catheter insertion length is not changed. The tip migration does decrease the analgesic effect of CISB.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Borgeat A, Dullenkopf A, Ekatodramis G, Nagy L. Evaluation of the lateral modified approach for continuous interscalene block after shoulder surgery. Anesthesiology. 2003;99:436–42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Ilfeld BM, Vandenborne K, Duncan PW, Sessler DI, Enneking FK, Shuster JJ, Theriaque DW, Chmielewski TL, Spadoni EH, Wright TW. Ambulatory continuous interscalene nerve blocks decrease the time to discharge readiness after total shoulder arthroplasty. Anesthesiology. 2006;105:999–1007.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Kim JH, Koh HJ, Kim DK, Lee HJ, Kwon KH, Lee KY, Kim YS. Interscalene brachial plexus bolus block versus patient-controlled interscalene indwelling catheter analgesia for the first 48 h after arthroscopic rotator cuff repair. J Shoulder Elb Surg. 2018;27:1243–50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Vorobeichik L, Brull R, Bowry R, Laffey JG, Abdallah FW. Should continuous rather than single-injection interscalene block be routinely offered for major shoulder surgery? A meta-analysis of the analgesic and side-effects profiles. Br J Anaesth. 2018;120:679–92.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Swenson JD, Davis JJ, Decou JA. A novel approach for assessing catheter position after ultrasound-guided placement of continuous interscalene block. Anesth Analg. 2008;106:1015–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Sabesan VJ, Shahriar R, Petersen-Fitts GR, Whaley JD, Bou-Akl T, Sweet M, Milia M. A prospective randomized controlled trial to identify the optimal postoperative pain management in shoulder arthroplasty: liposomal bupivacaine versus continuous interscalene catheter. J Shoulder Elb Surg. 2017;26:1810–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Shin HJ, Ahn JH, Jung HI, Lim CH, Shin HW, Lee HW, Lim HJ, Yoon SM, Chang SH. Feasibility of ultrasound-guided posterior approach for interscalene catheter placement during arthroscopic shoulder surgery. Korean J Anesthesiol. 2011;61:475–81.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Schwenk ES, Gandhi K, Baratta JL, Torjman M, Epstein RH, Chung J, Vaghari BA, Beausang D, Bojaxhi E, Grady B. Ultrasound-guided out-of-plane vs. in-plane interscalene catheters: a randomized, prospective study. Anesthesiol Pain Med. 2015;5:31111.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Ilfeld BM, Morey TE, Wright TW, Chidgey LK, Enneking FK. Continuous interscalene brachial plexus block for postoperative pain control at home: a randomized, double-blinded, placebo-controlled study. Anesth Analg. 2003;96:1089–95.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Mariano ER, Afra R, Loland VJ, Sandhu NS, Bellars RH, Bishop ML, Cheng GS, Choy LP, Maldonado RC, Ilfeld BM. Continuous interscalene brachial plexus block via an ultrasound-guided posterior approach: a randomized, triple-masked, placebo-controlled study. Anesth Analg. 2009;108:1688–94.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Klein SM, Nielsen KC, Buckenmaier CC 3rd, Kamal ASA, Rubin Y, Steele SM. 2-octyl cyanoacrylate glue for the fixation of continuous peripheral nerve catheters. Anesthesiology. 2003;98:590–1.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Gurnaney H, Kraemer FW, Ganesh A. Dermabond decreases pericatheter local anesthetic leakage after continuous perineural infusions. Anesth Analg. 2011;113:206.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Auyong DB, Cantor DA, Green C, Hanson NA. The effect of fixation technique on continuous interscalene nerve block catheter success: a randomized, double-blind trial. Anesth Analg. 2017;124:959–65.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Fredrickson MJ, Leightley P, Wong A, Chaddock M, Abeysekera A, Frampton C. An analysis of 1505 consecutive patients receiving continuous interscalene analgesia at home: a multicentre prospective safety study. Anaesthesia. 2016;71:373–9.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Antonakakis JG, Sites BD, Shiffrin J. Ultrasound-guided posterior approach for the placement of a continuous interscalene catheter. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2009;34:64–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Spence BC, Beach ML, Gallagher JD, Sites BD. Ultrasound-guided interscalene blocks: understanding where to inject the local anaesthetic. Anaesthesia. 2011;66:509–14.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Lang RS, Kentor ML, Vallejo M, Bigeleisen P, Wisniewski SR, Orebaugh SL. The impact of local anesthetic distribution on block onset in ultrasound-guided interscalene block. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2012;56:1146–51.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Fleiss JL, Levin B, Paik MC. Statistical methods for rates and proportions. 3rd ed. New York: Wiley; 2003. p. 64–85.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  19. Ahsan ZS, Carvalho B, Yao J. Incidence of failure of continuous peripheral nerve catheters for postoperative analgesia in upper extremity surgery. J Hand Surg Am. 2014;39:324–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Marhofer D, Marhofer P, Triffterer L, Leonhardt M, Weber M, Zeitlinger M. Dislocation rates of perineural catheters: a volunteer study. Br J Anaesth. 2013;111:800–6.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Fredrickson MJ, Ball CM, Dalgleish AJ. Posterior versus anterolateral approach interscalene catheter placement: a prospective randomized trial. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2011;36:125–33.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Finneran JJ, Swisher MW, Gabriel RA, Said ET, Abanobi MU, Abramson WB, Dalstrom DJ, Schwartz AK, Kent WT, Yang D, Mascha EJ, Ilfeld BM. Suture-method versus through-the-needle catheters for continuous popliteal-sciatic nerve blocks. Anesthesiology. 2020;132:854–66.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Webb CAJ, Kim TE, Funck N, Howard SK, Harrison TK, Ganaway T, Keng H, Mariano ER. Comparison of catheter tip migration using flexible and stimulating catheters inserted into the adductor canal in a cadaver model. J Anesth. 2015;29:471–4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Ilfeld BM, Sandhu NS, Loland VJ, Madison SJ, Suresh PJ, Mariano ER, Bishop ML, Schwartz AK, Lee DK. Ultrasound-guided (needle-in-plane) perineural catheter insertion: the effect of catheter-insertion distance on postoperative analgesia. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2011;36:261–5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Ilfeld BM. Continuous peripheral nerve blocks: an update of the published evidence and comparison with novel, alternative analgesic modalities. Anesth Analg. 2017;124:308–35.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Kan JM, Harrison TK, Kim TE, Howard SK, Kou A, Mariano ER. An in vitro study to evaluate the utility of the “air test” to infer perineural catheter tip location. J Ultrasound Med. 2013;32:529–33.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Abdallah FW, Halpern SH, Aoyama K, Brull R. Will the real benefits of single-shot interscalene block please stand up? A systematic review and meta-analysis. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2015;120:1114–29.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

None.

Funding

Departmental funding only.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Anesthesiology, Faculty of Medicine, Shimane University, 89-1 Enya-cho, Izumo City, Shimane, 693-8501, Japan

    Yuki Aoyama, Shinichi Sakura, Akiko Kitajo & Yoji Saito

Authors
  1. Yuki Aoyama
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Shinichi Sakura
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Akiko Kitajo
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Yoji Saito
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

All authors contributed to the study conception and design. Data collection and analysis were performed by Yuki Aoyama, Shinichi Sakura and Akiko Kitajo. The first draft of the manuscript was written by Yuki Aoyama and Shinichi Sakura, and all authors commented on the manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Shinichi Sakura.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

None.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Aoyama, Y., Sakura, S., Kitajo, A. et al. Incidence and effects of postoperative migration of interscalene catheter tips placed using ultrasound-guided anterior and posterior approaches. J Anesth 35, 175–183 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00540-020-02888-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00540-020-02888-3

Keywords

Search

Navigation