Advertisement

Journal of Anesthesia

, Volume 32, Issue 2, pp 300–304 | Cite as

The effect of in situ simulation training on the performance of tasks related to patient safety during sedation

  • Meital Ben-Ari
  • Gilad Chayen
  • Ivan P. Steiner
  • Dana Aronson Schinasi
  • Oren Feldman
  • Itai Shavit
Short Communication

Abstract

In many countries, procedural sedation outside of the operating room is performed by pediatricians. We examined if in situ sedation simulation training (SST) of pediatricians improves the performance of tasks related to patient safety during sedation in the Emergency Department (ED). We performed a single-center, quasi-experimental, study evaluating the performance of sedation, before-and-after SST. Sixteen pediatricians were evaluated during sedation as part of their usual practice, using the previously validated Sedation-Performance-Score (SPS). This tool evaluates physician behaviors during sedation that are conducive to safe patient outcomes. Following the sedation, providers completed SST, followed by a structured debriefing. They were then re-evaluated with the SPS during a subsequent patient sedation in the ED. Using multivariate regression, odds ratios were calculated for each SPS component, and were compared before and after the SST. Thirty-two sedations were performed, 16 before and 16 after SST. SPS scores improved from a median of 4 (IQR 2–5) to 6 (IQR 4–7) following SST (p < 0.0009, median difference 2, 95% CI 1–3). SST was associated with improved performance in four SPS components. The findings of this pilot study suggest that sedation simulation training of pediatricians improves several tasks related to patient safety during sedation.

Keywords

Sedation Emergency In situ simulation Children 

Abbreviations

ED

Emergency department

SPS

Sedation Performance Score

Notes

Author contributions

Dr. MB-A: Designed the study and the analysis plan; collected, analyzed and interpreted the data; and critically revised the manuscript for important intellectual content. Dr. GC: Facilitated simulations; collected, analyzed and interpreted the data; and critically revised the manuscript for important intellectual content. Prof. IPS: Analyzed and interpreted the data, and critically revised the manuscript for important intellectual content. Dr. DAS: Interpreted the data, and critically revised the manuscript for important intellectual content. Dr. OF: Interpreted the data, and critically revised the manuscript for important intellectual content. Prof. IS: Designed the study and the analysis plan, drafted the manuscript, and analyzed and interpreted the data. Professor IS has full access to all of the data in the study and takes responsibility for the integrity of the data and the accuracy of the data analysis.

Funding

No honorarium, grant, or other form of payment was given to anyone to produce the manuscript. No funding received for this work from any organizations.

Compliance with ethical standards

Financial discloser

None declared for all authors.

Conflict of interest

For all authors, there are no potential conflicts of interest, real or perceived in the study design, the collection, analysis, and interpretation of data, the writing of the report, and the decision to submit the paper for publication.

References

  1. 1.
    Krauss BS, Green SM. Procedural sedation and its place in paediatric emergency medicine. Emerg Med J. 2016;33(8):525–6.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Mintegi S, Shavit I,  Benito J, REPEM group (Research in European Paediatric Emergency Medicine). Pediatric emergency care in Europe: a descriptive survey of 53 tertiary medical centers. Pediatr Emerg Care. 2008;24(6):359–63.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Webster CS, Mason KP, Shafer SL. Threats to safety during sedation outside of the operating room and the death of Michael Jackson. Curr Opin Anaesthesiol. 2016;29(1):S36–47.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Hartling L, Milne A, Foisy M, Lang ES, Sinclair D, Klassen TP, Evered L. What works and what’s safe in pediatric emergency procedural sedation: an overview of reviews. Acad Emerg Med. 2016;23(5):519–30.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Griswold S, Ponnuru S, Nishisaki A, Szyld D, Davenport M, Deutsch ES, Nadkarni V. The emergency role of simulation education to achieve patient safety: translating deliberate practice and debriefing to save lives. Pediatr Clin N Am. 2012;59(6):1329–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Israel Ministry of Health. Pediatric Sedation by non-anesthesiologists outside the operating room. May 13, 2003. https://www.health.gov.il/hozer/mr35_2003.pdf. Accessed 23 Nov 2017.
  7. 7.
    Petrosoniak A, Auerbach M, Wong AH, Hicks CM. In situ simulation in emergency medicine: moving beyond the simulation lab. Emerg Med Aust. 2017;29(1):83–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Siegel NA, Kobayashi L, Dunbar-Viveiros JA, Devine J, Al-Rasheed RS, Gardiner FG, Olsson K, Lai S, Jones MS, Dannecker M, Overly FL, Gosbee JW, Portelli DC, Jay GD. In situ medical simulation investigation of emergency department procedural sedation with randomized trial of experimental bedside clinical process guidance intervention. Simul Healthc. 2015;10(3):146–53.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Fehr JJ, Pesach IM. The role of simulation in safety and training. Pediatric sedation outside the operating room. New York: Springer; 2015. p. 657–84.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Fehr JJ, Chao J, Kuan C, Zhong J. The important role of simulation in sedation. Curr Opin Anaesthesiol. 2016;29:S14–20.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Shavit I, Keidan I, Hoffmann Y, Mishuk L, Rubin O, Ziv A, Steiner IP. Enhancing patient safety during pediatric sedation: the impact of simulation-based training of nonanesthesiologists. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 2007;161(8):740–3.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Bhatt M, Kennedy RM, Osmond MH, Krauss B, McAllister JD, Ansermino JM, Evered LM, Roback MG. Consensus Panel on Sedation Research of Pediatric Emergency Research Canada (PERC) and the Pediatric Emergency Care Applied Research Network (PECARN). Consensus-based recommendations for standardizing terminology and reporting adverse events for emergency department procedural sedation and analgesia in children. Ann Emerg Med. 2009;53(4):426–35.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Langhan ML, Shabanova V, Li FY, Bernstein SL, Shapiro ED. A randomized controlled trial of capnography during sedation in a pediatric emergency setting. Am J Emerg Med. 2015;33(1):25–30.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Keidan I, Gravenstein D, Berkenstadt H, Ziv A, Shavit I, Sidi A. Supplemental oxygen compromises the use of pulse oximetry for detection of apnea and hypoventilation during sedation in simulated pediatric patients. Pediatrics. 2008;122(2):293–8.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Dull KE, Bachur RG. Simulation in the pediatric emergency department. Clin Pediatr (Phila). 2012;51(8):711–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Komasawa N, Fujiwara S, Atagi K, Ueki R, Haba M, Ueshima H, Kaminoh Y, Minami T. Effects of a simulation-based sedation training course on non-anesthesiologists’ attitudes toward sedation and analgesia. J Anesth. 2014;28(5):785–9.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Sauter TC, Hautz WE, Hostettler S, Brodmann-Maeder M, Martinolli L, Lehmann B, Exadaktylos AK, Haider DG. Interprofessional and interdisciplinary simulation-based training leads to safe sedation procedures in the emergency department. Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med. 2016;24:97.  https://doi.org/10.1186/s13049-016-0291-7.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    DeMaria S Jr, Levine AI, Cohen LB. Human patient simulation and its role in endoscopic sedation training. Gastrointest Endosc Clin N Am. 2008;18(4):801–13.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Jung D, Carman M, Aga R, Burnett A. Disaster preparedness in the emergency department using in situ simulation. Adv Emerg Nurs J. 2016;38(1):56–68.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Qian J, Wang Y, Zhang Y, Zhu X, Rong Q, Wei H. A survey of the first-hour basic care tasks of severe sepsis and septic shock in pediatric patients and an evaluation of medical simulation on improving the compliance of the tasks. J Emerg Med. 2016;50(2):239–45.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Japanese Society of Anesthesiologists 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Meital Ben-Ari
    • 1
  • Gilad Chayen
    • 2
    • 3
  • Ivan P. Steiner
    • 4
  • Dana Aronson Schinasi
    • 5
  • Oren Feldman
    • 2
  • Itai Shavit
    • 2
  1. 1.Rappaport Faculty of MedicineTechnion-Institute of TechnologyHaifaIsrael
  2. 2.Pediatric Emergency DepartmentRambam Health Care CampusHaifaIsrael
  3. 3.Simulation Laboratory, Rappaport Faculty of MedicineTechnion-Institute of TechnologyHaifaIsrael
  4. 4.Faculty of MedicineUniversity of AlbertaEdmontonCanada
  5. 5.Division of Emergency MedicineLurie Children’s Hospital of ChicagoChicagoUSA

Personalised recommendations