Skip to main content
Log in

Peripheral nerve blocks as the sole anesthetic technique in a patient with severe Duchenne muscular dystrophy

  • Clinical Report
  • Published:
Journal of Anesthesia Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

General anesthesia and central neuraxial blockades in patients with severe Duchenne muscular dystrophy are associated with high risks of complications, including rhabdomyolysis, malignant hyperthermia, hemodynamic instability, and postoperative mechanical ventilation. Here, we describe peripheral nerve blocks as a safe approach to anesthesia in a patient with severe Duchenne muscular dystrophy who was scheduled to undergo surgery. A 22-year-old male patient was scheduled to undergo reduction and internal fixation of a left distal femur fracture. He had been diagnosed with Duchenne muscular dystrophy at 5 years of age, and had no locomotive capability except for that of the finger flexors and toe extensors. He had developed symptoms associated with dyspnea 5 years before and required intermittent ventilation. We blocked the femoral nerve, lateral femoral cutaneous nerve, and parasacral plexus under ultrasound on the left leg. The patient underwent a successful operation using peripheral nerve blocks with no complications. In conclusion general anesthesia and central neuraxial blockades in patients with severe Duchenne muscular dystrophy are unsafe approaches to anesthesia because of hemodynamic instability and respiratory depression. Peripheral nerve blocks are the best way to reduce the risks of critical complications, and are a safe and feasible approach to anesthesia in patients with severe Duchenne muscular dystrophy.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Biggar WD, Klamut HJ, Demacio PC, Stevens DJ, Ray PN. Duchenne muscular dystrophy: current knowledge, treatment, and future prospects. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2002;401:88–106.

  2. Gurnaney H, Brown A, Litman RS. Malignant hyperthermia and muscular dystrophies. Anesth Analg. 2009;109:1043–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Hayes J, Veyckemans F, Bissonnette B. Duchenne muscular dystrophy: an old anesthesia problem revisited. Paediatr Anaesth. 2008;18:100–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Goresky GV, Cox RG. Inhalation anesthetics and Duchenne’s muscular dystrophy. Can J Anaesth. 1999;46:525–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Wick S, Muenster T, Schmidt J, Forst J, Schmitt HJ. Onset and duration of rocuronium-induced neuromuscular blockade in patients with Duchenne muscular dystrophy. Anesthesiology. 2005;102:915–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Yemen TA, McClain C. Muscular dystrophy, anesthesia and the safety of inhalational agents revisited; again. Paediatr Anaesth. 2006;16:105–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Muenster T, Schmidt J, Wick S, Forst J, Schmitt HJ. Rocuronium 0.3 mg kg−1 (ED95) induces a normal peak effect but an altered time course of neuromuscular block in patients with Duchenne’s muscular dystrophy. Paediatr Anaesth. 2006;16:840–5.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Almenrader N, Patel D. Spinal fusion surgery in children with non-idiopathic scoliosis: is there a need for routine postoperative ventilation? Br J Anaesth. 2006;97:851–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Smith CL, Bush GH. Anaesthesia and progressive muscular dystrophy. Br J Anaesth. 1985;57:1113–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Braun DL. Spinal, epidural, and caudal anesthesia. In: Miller RD, editor. Miller’s Anesthesia. 7th ed. Philadelphia: Churchill Livingstone; 2009. p. 1616–8.

  11. Harper CM, Ambler G, Edge G. The prognostic value of pre-operative predicted forced vital capacity in corrective spinal surgery for Duchenne’s muscular dystrophy. Anaesthesia. 2004;59:1160–2.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Carpenter RL, Caplan RA, Brown DL, Stephenson C, Wu R. Incidence and risk factors for side effects of spinal anesthesia. Anesthesiology. 1992;76:906–16.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Moore DC, Bridenbaugh LD. Spinal (subarachnoid) block. A review of 11,574 cases. JAMA. 1966;195:907–12.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. de Visme V, Picart F, Le Jouan R, Legrand A, Savry C, Morin V. Combined lumbar and sacral plexus block compared with plain bupivacaine spinal anesthesia for hip fractures in the elderly. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2000;25:158–62.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Parkinson SK, Mueller JB, Little WL, Bailey SL. Extent of blockade with various approaches to the lumbar plexus. Anesth Analg. 1989;68:243–8.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Yee Suk Kim.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

None of the authors had conflicts of interest in relation to this study or received funding by the manufacturer.

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Bang, S.U., Kim, Y.S., Kwon, W.J. et al. Peripheral nerve blocks as the sole anesthetic technique in a patient with severe Duchenne muscular dystrophy. J Anesth 30, 320–323 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00540-015-2127-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00540-015-2127-4

Keywords

Navigation