Abstract
Purpose
The use of an endobronchial blocker in conjunction with a supraglottic device in elective thoracic cases has never been studied. The aim of this study was to report the success rate and time to placement of the endobronchial blocker in anaesthetized patients with a laryngeal mask airway (LMA)-ProSeal™ in place.
Methods
This was a single-center, prospective, descriptive pilot study that enrolled 30 patients aged 18–75 years, with ASA I–III, who underwent elective thoracotomy or video-assisted thoracoscopy. We collected data on time to placement of the endobronchial blocker into the selected bronchus, time consumed for final blocker positioning and inflation, lung deflation score at chest opening, and postoperative airway complications.
Results
One patient was excluded because of high peak airway pressure during LMA ventilation. The time required for blocker placement in the right main bronchus was shorter [mean 160 (78–480) s] compared with that for the left main bronchus [225 (117–420) s]. The blocker was successfully placed on the first attempt in 25 patients. Lung deflation score graded by the surgeon was 8/10 (median). Minor postoperative airway complications, such as sore throat (28.6 %) and hoarseness of voice (17.9 %), were reported.
Conclusions
The use of LMA-ProSeal™ in conjunction with the COOPDECH Endobronchial Blocker Tube may be considered an alternative one-lung ventilation technique in selected cases. However, success rates and time required for placement of the blocker seem dependent on the operator’s skill. Although postoperative sore throat and hoarseness of voice were reported, these improved in 24 h.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Lohser J. Evidence-based management of one-lung ventilation. Anesthesiol Clin. 2008;26:241–72.
Hagihira S, Takashina M, Mori T, Yoshiya I. One-lung ventilation in patients with difficult airways. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth. 1998;12:186–8.
Kosarek L, Busch E, Abbas A, Falterman J, Nossaman BD. Effective use of bronchial blockers in lung isolation surgery: an analysis of 130 cases. Ochsner J. 2013;13:389–93.
Campos JH. Lung isolation techniques for patients with difficult airway. Curr Opin Anaesthesiol. 2010;23:12–7.
Fabila TS, Menghraj SJ. One lung ventilation strategies for infants and children undergoing video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery. Indian J Anaesth. 2013;57:339–44.
Joshi GP, Inagaki Y, White PF, Taylor-Kennedy L, Wat LI, Gevirtz C, McCraney JM, McCulloch DA. Use of the laryngeal mask airway as an alternative to the tracheal tube during ambulatory Anesthesia. Anesth Analg. 1997;85:573–7.
Maltby JR, Beriault MT, Watson NC, Liepert DJ, Fick GH. LMA-Classic and LMA-ProSeal are effective alternatives to endotracheal intubation for gynecologic laparoscopy. Can J Anaesth. 2003;50:71–7.
Devitt JH, Wenstone R, Noel AG, O’Donnell MP. The laryngeal mask airway and positive-pressure ventilation. Anesthesiology. 1994;80:550–5.
Keller C, Brimacombe J. Mucosal pressure and oropharyngeal leak pressure with the ProSeal versus the classic laryngeal mask airway. Br J Anaesth. 2000;85:262–6.
Brimacombe J, Keller C. The ProSeal laryngeal mask airway: a randomized, crossover study with the standard laryngeal mask airway in paralyzed, anesthetized patients. Anesthesiology. 2000;93:104–9.
Maltby JR, Beriault MT, Watson NC, Liepert D, Fick GH. The LMA-ProSeal is an effective alternative to tracheal intubation for laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Can J Anaesth. 2002;49:857–62.
Maltby JR, Beriault MT, Watson NC, Liepert DJ, Fick GH. LMA-Classic and LMA-ProSeal are effective alternatives to endotracheal intubation for gynecologic laparoscopy. Can J Anaesth. 2003;50:71–7.
Cook TM, Lee G, Nolan JP. The ProSeal laryngeal mask airway: a review of the literature. Can J Anesth. 2005;52:739–60.
Ozaki M, Murashima K, Fukutome T. One-lung ventilation using the ProSeal™ laryngeal mask airway. Anaesthesia. 2004;9:726.
Li P, Liang W, Gu H. One-lung ventilation using ProSeal™ laryngeal mask airway and Arndt endobronchial blocker in paediatric scoliosis surgery. Br J Anaesth. 2009;6:902–3.
Robinson AR 3rd, Gravenstein N, Alomar-Melero E, Peng YG. Lung isolation using a laryngeal mask airway and a bronchial blocker in a patient with a recent tracheostomy. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth. 2008;22:883–6.
Tsuchihashi T, Ide S, Nakagawa H, Hishinuma N, Takano T, Nishizawa M. Differential lung ventilation using laryngeal mask airway and a bronchial blocker tube for a patient with unanticipated difficult intubation. Masui. 2007;9:1075–7 (Article in Japanese).
Howath A, Brimacombe J, Keller C. Gum-elastic bougie-guided insertion of the ProSeal laryngeal mask airway: a new technique. Anaesth Intensive Care. 2002;30:624–7.
Keller C, Brimacombe JR, Keller K, Morris R. Comparison of four methods for assessing airway sealing pressure with the laryngeal mask airway in adult patients. Br J Anaesth. 1999;82:286–7.
Liu EH, Goy RW, Chen FG. An evaluation of poor LMA CTrach view with fibreoptic laryngoscope and the effectiveness of corrective measures. Br J Anaesth. 2006;97:878–2.
Yoshimura T, Ueda K, Kakinuma A, Sawai J, Nakata Y. Bronchial blocker lung collapse technique: nitrous oxide for facilitating lung collapse during one-lung ventilation with a bronchial blocker. Anesth Analgesia. 2014;118:666–70.
Sharma B, Sehgal R, Sahai C, Sood J. PLMA vs. I-gel: a comparative evaluation of respiratory mechanics in laparoscopic cholecystectomy. J Anaesthesiol Clin Pharmacol. 2010;26:451–7.
Komasawa N, Ueki R, Itani M, Nomura H, Nishi SI, Kaminoh Y. Evaluation of tracheal intubation in several positions by the Pentax-AWS airway Scope: a manikin study. J Anesth. 2010;24:908–12.
Acknowledgments
The authors thank all the residents and fellows of the 2010 anesthesiology class for their time and effort spent during the manikin testing of different supraglottic devices and bronchial blockers. We also thank Assoc. Prof. Tanyong Pipanmekaporn for assistance with statistical analysis.
Conflict of interest
None of the authors have conflicts of interest to declare.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
ClinicalTrial.gov ID: NCT02106273
Electronic supplementary material
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
About this article
Cite this article
Sawasdiwipachai, P., Boonsri, S., Suksompong, S. et al. The uses of laryngeal mask airway ProSeal™ and endobronchial blocker for one lung anesthesia. J Anesth 29, 660–665 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00540-015-2004-1
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00540-015-2004-1