Skip to main content
Log in

Modeling of safe window for percutaneous thoracic sympathectomy

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Journal of Anesthesia Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

Despite the many benefits of percutaneous thoracic sympathectomy, it also has serious complications such as pneumothorax. This study was conducted in order to determine the safe percutaneous entering window and angles for the needle during T2 and T3 thoracic sympathectomy avoiding pneumothorax.

Methods

Transverse section of CT images that crosses at the middle of the T2 or T3 vertebral body was selected. Medial and lateral imaginary lines were drawn from the dorsoventrally midpoint on the lateral surface of the vertebral body (v) to the skin. The medial one was drawn to the skin medially as much as possible tangent to the vertebral body (vM). The lateral one was drawn to the skin tangent to parietal pleura (vL). c was defined as the point where the midsagittal line meets the skin. The distance cM and cL, the angle aM and aL made between the midsagittal line and vM or vL lines were measured. To determine the relations between patients’ covariates and measured data, mixed-effect population analysis was performed for the cL, aL, and vL.

Results

In males, the mean values of cL were 85.3 and 79.2 mm for T2 and T3, respectively. In females, they were 71.5 and 63.7 mm for T2 and T3, respectively. Population analysis revealed that cL was best described with age, weight, gender covariates, and interindividual variability. The aL was best described with BMI and gender covariates.

Conclusions

The covariates’ relationship and interindividual variability resulting from the mixed-effect analysis enhanced individual prediction for safe widows.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Ohseto K. Efficacy of thoracic sympathetic ganglion block and prediction of complications: clinical evaluation of the anterior paratracheal and posterior paravertebral approaches in 234 patients. J Anesth. 1992;6:316–31.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Straube S, Derry S, Moore RA, Cole P. Cervico-thoracic or lumbar sympathectomy for neuropathic pain and complex regional pain syndrome. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013;9:CD002918.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Wilkinson HA. Hand edema after cervical fusion. JAMA. 1983;249:652 (letter).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Wilkinson HA. Percutaneous radiofrequency upper thoracic sympathectomy. Neurosurgery. 1996;38:715–25.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Hirose M, Tabata M, Sakai M, Takeuchi K. C-arm fluoroscopic cone-beam CT for guidance of chemical thoracic sympathectomy. J Anesth. 2011;25:142–3.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Ohseto K. Contrast radiography and effects of thoracic sympathetic ganglion block–anatomical analysis. J Anesth. 1991;5:132–41.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Agarwal-Kozlowski K, Lorke DE, Habermann CR, Schulte am Esch J, Beck H. Interventional management of intractable sympathetically mediated pain by computed tomography-guided catheter implantation for block and neuroablation of the thoracic sympathetic chain: technical approach and review of 322 procedures. Anaesthesia. 2011;66:699–708.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Dondelinger RF, Kurdziel JC. Percutaneous phenol block of the upper thoracic sympathetic chain with computed tomography guidance. A new technique. Acta Radiol. 1987;28:511–5.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Chuang KS, Liu JC. Long-term assessment of percutaneous stereotactic thermocoagulation of upper thoracic ganglionectomy and sympathectomy for palmar and craniofacial hyperhidrosis in 1742 cases. Neurosurgery. 2002;51:963–9 (discussion 969–70).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Gibiansky L, Gibiansky E, Bauer R. Comparison of Nonmem 7.2 estimation methods and parallel processing efficiency on a target-mediated drug disposition model. J Pharmacokinet Pharmacodyn. 2012;39:17–35.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Jonsson EN, Karlsson MO. Xpose–an S-PLUS based population pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic model building aid for NONMEM. Comput Method Progr Biomed. 1999;58:51–64.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Brendel K, Dartois C, Comets E, Lemenuel-Diot A, Laveille C, Tranchand B, Girard P, Laffont CM, Mentre F. Are population pharmacokinetic and/or pharmacodynamic models adequately evaluated? A survey of the literature from 2002 to 2004. Clin Pharmacokinet. 2007;46:221–34.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Steyerberg EW, Bleeker SE, Moll HA, Grobbee DE, Moons KG. Internal and external validation of predictive models: a simulation study of bias and precision in small samples. J Clin Epidemiol. 2003;56:441–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Masharawi Y, Salame K, Mirovsky Y, Peleg S, Dar G, Steinberg N, Hershkovitz I. Vertebral body shape variation in the thoracic and lumbar spine: characterization of its asymmetry and wedging. Clin Anat. 2008;21:46–54.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Aldrete JA, Mushin AU, Zapata JC, Ghaly R. Skin to cervical epidural space distances as read from magnetic resonance imaging films: consideration of the “hump pad.”. J Clin Anesth. 1998;10:309–13.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Henneberg M, Ulijaszek SJ. Body frame dimensions are related to obesity and fatness: lean trunk size, skinfolds, and body mass index. Am J Hum Biol. 2010;22:83–91.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Gayzik FS, Yu MM, Danelson KA, Slice DE, Stitzel JD. Quantification of age-related shape change of the human rib cage through geometric morphometrics. J Biomech. 2008;41:1545–54.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Kim WH, Lee CJ, Kim TH, Shin BS, Sim WS. The optimal oblique angle of fluoroscope for thoracic sympathetic ganglion block. Clin Auton Res. 2011;21:89–96.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Tae Kyun Kim.

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Lee, D.W., Hong, J.M., Hwang, B.Y. et al. Modeling of safe window for percutaneous thoracic sympathectomy. J Anesth 29, 379–385 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00540-014-1929-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00540-014-1929-0

Keywords

Navigation