Skip to main content
Log in

Lateral Trendelenburg with the injected side down after the block improves the efficacy of the axillary approach to brachial plexus block

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Journal of Anesthesia Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

We hypothesized that, after axillary block, positioning the patient in a lateral position with the injected side down and simultaneously in a 20° Trendelenburg position will increase the success rate and quality of the block.

Methods

Fifty patients with chronic renal failure (ASA 2–3) scheduled for arteriovenous fistula surgery were included in this study. In all patients, 30–40 ml of 0.25 % levobupivacaine were injected into the axillary sheath. The block was performed as three injections (multiple injection technique) with the arm in 90° abduction and 90° flexion in the supine position. Patients were randomly allocated to two groups. Group I (n = 25) patients were kept in the supine position after the block. Group II (n = 25) patients were positioned laterally after the block with the injected arm down and in a 20° Trendelenburg position. Sensory and motor block were evaluated at 2, 4, 6, 8, 10, 15, 20, and 25 min after the administration of the block. Thus, the patients in group II were evaluated in a lateral position during the first 30 min. Throughout the surgery and the recovery period, sensory and motor block were evaluated at 30-min intervals.

Results

There were no significant intergroup differences in the effects on radial, ulnar, median, and musculoskeletal nerve blockade. Thirty minutes after the injection, the patients in group II had higher levels of sensory axillary nerve blockade. Subscapular and thoracodorsal nerve motor block were not detected in group I, while 84 % of the patients in group II experienced blockade of both of these nerves (p < 0.01).

Conclusion

We conclude that, for patients undergoing an axillary block, positioning the patient laterally with the injected side down and in a 20° Trendelenburg position increases the success rate and quality of the block.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Cousins MJ, Bridenbaugh PO, Carr DB, Horlocker TT. Neural blockade in clinical anesthesia and pain medicine. 4th ed. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams and Wilkins; 2008.

  2. Winnie AP. Plexus anesthesia. Volume 1: Perivascular techniques of brachial plexus block. Philadelphia: WB Saunders; 1984. p. 157.

  3. Koscielniak-Nielsen ZJ, Horn A, Nielsen PR. Effect of arm position on the effectiveness of perivascular axillary nerve block. Br J Anaesth. 1995;74:387–91.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Ababou A, Marzouk N, Mosadiq A, Sbihi A. The effects of arm position on onset and duration of axillary brachial plexus block. Anesth Analg. 2007;104:980–1.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Orlowski O, Bullmann V, Vieth V, Filler T, Osada N, Van Aken H, Weber TP. Perivascular axillary brachial plexus block and patient positioning: the influence of a lateral, head-down position. Anaesthesia. 2006;61:528–34.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Orebaugh SL, Williams BA. Brachial plexus anatomy: normal and variant. ScientificWorldJournal. 2009;9:300–12.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Ongoiba N, Destrieux C, Koumare AK. Anatomical variations of the brachial plexus. Morphologie. 2002;86:31–4.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Helayel PE, Conceicao DB, Nascimento BS, Kohler A, Boos GL, Oliveira Filho GR. Learning curve for the ultrasound anatomy of the brachial plexus in the axillary region. Rev Bras Anestesiol. 2009;59:187–93.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Thompson GE, Rorie DK. Functional anatomy of the brachial plexus sheaths. Anesthesiology. 1983;59:117–22.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Partridge BL, Katz J, Benirschke K. Functional anatomy of the brachial plexus sheath: implications for anesthesia. Anesthesiology. 1987;66:743–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Retzl G, Kapral S, Greher M, Mauritz W. Ultrasonographic findings of the axillary part of the brachial plexus. Anesth Analg. 2001;92:1271–5.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Yamamoto K, Tsubokawa T, Ohmura S, Kobayashi T. The effects of arm position on central spread of local anesthetics and on quality of the block with axillary brachial plexus block. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 1999;24:36–42.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Vester-Andersen T, Broby-Johansen U, Bro-Rasmussen F. Perivascular axillary block VI: the distribution of gelatine solution injected into the axillary neurovascular sheath of cadavers. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 1986;30:18–22.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We thank Oguz Alp Turan for his assistance in language editing.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Alkin Colak.

About this article

Cite this article

Salih Sevdi, M., Gunday, I., Arar, C. et al. Lateral Trendelenburg with the injected side down after the block improves the efficacy of the axillary approach to brachial plexus block. J Anesth 28, 538–543 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00540-013-1766-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00540-013-1766-6

Keywords

Navigation