Skip to main content
Log in

A novel method for SLIPA™ size selection, for adult patients, on the basis of chamber length

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Journal of Anesthesia Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

Nowadays the size of the streamlined liner of the pharynx airway (SLIPA™) is selected by matching the width of the thyroid cartilage of the patient to the widest dimension of the SLIPA™. The objective of this work was to improve the method of selection by matching the distance between the otobasion inferius and the most inferior margin of the cricoid cartilage (O–C) to the length of the SLIPA™ chamber.

Methods

100 patients (ASAI–II) scheduled to undergo operations under general anesthesia were randomly divided into two groups, group A (size selected by matching O–C with SLIPA™ chamber length, n = 50) and group B (size selected by matching the width of the thyroid cartilage with the widest dimension of the SLIPA™, n = 50). We measured the distance between the nasopharynx and the interarytenoid fold (N–I) and investigated the correlation between O–C and N–I at the neutral head position. Number of attempts, insertion time, blood on the device, leakage, and the need to change sizes were assessed.

Results

A positive correlation (r = 0.68, p < 0.05) was detected between N–I and O–C. Leakage was observed in 6 % (n = 3) of group A patients and in 20 % (n = 10) of group B patients (p < 0.05).

Conclusion

Compared with the classic size-selection method, matching the width of the thyroid cartilage with that of the SLIPA™, the size-selection method of matching SLIPA™ chamber length to O–C for adult patients is more accurate.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Miller DM, Lavelle M. A streamlined pharynx airway liner: a pilot study in 22 patients in controlled and spontaneous ventilation. Anesth Analg. 2002;94:759–61.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Miller DM, Light D. Laboratory and clinical comparisons of the streamlined liner of the pharynx airway (SLIPA™) with the laryngeal mask airway. Anesthesia. 2003;58:136–42.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Miller DM, Camporota L. Advantages of ProSeal™ and SLIPA™ over tracheal tubes for gynecological laparoscopies. Can J Anesth. 2006;53(2):188–93.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Miller DM. A proposed classification and scoring system for supraglottic sealing airways: a brief review. Anesth Analg. 2004;99:1553–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Lange M, Smul T, Zimmermann P, Kohlenberger R, Roewer N, Kehl F. The effectiveness and patient comfort of the novel streamlined pharynx airway liner (SLIPA) compared with the conventional laryngeal mask airway in ophthalmic surgery. Anesth Analg. 2007;104(2):431–4.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Spitzer VM, Whitlock DG. National Library of Medicine (U.S.). Part I original images. In: Transverse atlas of the visible human male: reverse engineering of the human body. Sudbury: Jones and Bartlett Publishers, Inc.; 1998. p. 28–31.

  7. Moeller TB, Reif E. Neck-axial. In: Pocket atlas of sectional anatomy—CT and MRI—vol 1. Head and neck. New York: Thieme New York; 2007. p. 166–7.

  8. Jiang SX, Ma SS. Head and neck. In: Atlas of sectional anatomy correlated with MRI CT and ECT. Shen Yang: Liaoning Science and Technology Publishing House; 2006, p. 26–7.

  9. Greenland KB, Edwards MJ, Hutton NJ. External auditory meatus–sternal notch relationship in adults in the sniffing position: a magnetic resonance imaging study. Br J Anaesth. 2010;104(2):268–9.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Rice MJ, Mancuso AA, Gibbs C, Morey TE, Gravenstein NL, Deitte LA. Cricoid pressure results in compression of the postcricoid hypopharynx: the esophageal position is irrelevant. Anesth Analg. 2009;109(5):1546–52.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Schmalfuss IM, Mancuso AA, Tart RP. Postcricoid region and cervical esophagus: Normal appearance at CT and MRI. Radiology. 2000;214:237–46.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Asoh R, Goyal RK. Manometry and electromyography of the upper esophageal sphincter in the opossum. Gastroenterology. 1978;74:514–20.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Goyal RK, Cobb, BW .Motility of the pharynx, esophagus and esophageal sphincters. In: Johnson LR, editor, translator and editor. Physiology of the Gastrointestinal Tract. New York: Raven Press, 1981;359–91.

  14. Singh S, Hamdy S. The upper oesophageal sphincter. Neurogastroenterol Motil. 2005;17(Suppl. 1):3–12.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Samman N, Mohammadi H, Xia J. Cephalometric norms for the upper airway in a healthy Hong Kong Chinese population. Hong Kong Med. 2003;9(1):25–30.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Conflict of interest

None.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Xinchuan Wei.

About this article

Cite this article

Li, Y., Xie, Y. & Wei, X. A novel method for SLIPA™ size selection, for adult patients, on the basis of chamber length. J Anesth 27, 557–562 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00540-013-1571-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00540-013-1571-2

Keywords

Navigation