Abstract
Purpose
Despite the importance of the inhibition of catabolic response to surgery, the effects of different anesthetic techniques on the catabolic response in surgical patients are controversial. This study compared the endocrine-metabolic responses and protein catabolism during gastrectomy in patients who received either sevoflurane or propofol anesthesia with remifentanil.
Methods
Thirty-seven patients (American Society of Anesthesiologists status I–III) aged 20–79 years undergoing elective gastrectomy were randomly assigned to receive sevoflurane anesthesia with remifentanil (n = 19) or intravenous propofol anesthesia (Propofol-Lipuro® 1 %; B. Braun, Melshungen AG, Germany) with remifentanil (n = 18). Urine samples were collected every 1 h after skin incision (0 h) and the urinary 3-methylhistidine:creatinine ratio (3-MH/Cr ratio) was used as a marker of protein catabolism. Respiratory quotient was measured during a 1 h period following skin incision.
Results
The 3-MH/Cr ratio significantly increased at 1–2 and 2–3 h compared to 0 and 0–1 h in both groups, but the propofol group exhibited a lower 3-MH/Cr ratio (nmol/μmol) than the sevoflurane group at 1–2 h (15.7 vs. 18.2, P = 0.012) and 2–3 h (15.9 vs. 18.1, P = 0.025). A difference was observed in the respiratory quotient between the sevoflurane and propofol groups (0.726 vs. 0.707, P = 0.003).
Conclusion
A lower 3-MH/Cr ratio and a lower respiratory quotient during propofol anesthesia, compared to those exhibited during sevoflurane anesthesia, suggest that protein sparing probably occurs through the utilization of medium-chain triglycerides contained in the fat emulsion of propofol solution as a fuel source.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Carli F, Ramachandra V, Gandy J, Merritt H, Ford GC, Read M, Halliday D. Effect of general anaesthesia on whole body protein turnover in patients undergoing elective surgery. Br J Anaesth. 1990;65:373–9.
Schricker T, Lattermann R, Carli F. Intraoperative protein sparing with glucose. J Appl Physiol. 2005;99:898–901.
Schricker T, Lattermann R, Schreiber M, Geisser W, Georgieff M, Radermacher P. The hyperglycaemic response to surgery: pathophysiology, clinical implications and modifications by the anaesthetic techniques. Clin Int Care. 1998;9:118–28.
Schricker T, Carli F, Schreiber M, Wachter U, Geisser W, Lattermann R, Georgieff M. Propofol/sufentanil anesthesia suppresses the metabolic and endocrine response during, not after, lower abdominal surgery. Anesth Analg. 2000;90:450–5.
Schricker T, Lattermann R, Fiset P, Wykes L, Carli F. Integrated analysis of protein and glucose metabolism during surgery: effects of anesthesia. J Appl Physiol. 2001;91:2523–30.
Kitamura T, Ogawa M, Kawamura G, Sato K, Yamada Y. The effects of sevoflurane and propofol on glucose metabolism under aerobic conditions in fed rats. Anesth Analg. 2009;109:1479–85.
Nygren J. The metabolic effects of fasting and surgery. Best Pract Res Clin Anaesthesiol. 2006;20:429–38.
Milewski P, Chir B, Holbrook I, Irving M. Urinary 3-methylhistidine:creatinine ratio in patients on long-term parenteral nutrition. J Parenter Enter Nutr. 1980;4:286–9.
López-Hellín J, Baena-Fustegueras JA, Vidal M, Riera SS, García-Arumí E. Perioperative nutrition prevents the early protein losses in patients submitted to gastrointestinal surgery. Clin Nutr. 2004;23:1001–8.
Weir JBV. New methods for calculating metabolic rate with special reference to protein metabolism. J Physiol. 1949;109:1–9.
Schricker T, Klubien K, Carli F. The independent effect of propofol anesthesia on whole body protein metabolism in humans. Anesthesiology. 1999;90:1636–42.
Hoover HC Jr, Grant JP, Gorschboth C, Ketcham AS. Nitrogen-sparing intravenous fluids on postoperative patients. N Engl J Med. 1975;24:172–5.
Jiang Z-M, Zhang S-Y, Wang X-R, Yang N-F, Zhu Y, Wilmore D. A comparison of medium-chain and long-chain triglycerides in surgical patients. Ann Surg. 1993;217:175–84.
Bach AC, Guiraud M, Gibault J, Schirardin H, Frey A, Bouletreay P. Medium chain triglycerides in septic patients on total parenteral nutrition. Clin Nutr. 1988;7:157–63.
Ball MJ. Parenteral nutrition in the critically ill: use of a medium chain triglyceride emulsion. Intensive Care Med. 1993;19:89–95.
Lindgren BF, Ruokonen E, Magnusson-Borg K, Takala J. Nitrogen sparing effect of a structured triglycerides containing both medium- and long-chain fatty acids in critically ill patients; a double blind randomized controlled trials. Clin Nutr. 2001;20:43–8.
Nolan CJ, Madiraju MSR, Delghingaro-Augusto V, Peyot M-L, Prentki M. Fatty acid signaling in the β-cell and insulin secretion. Diabetes. 2006;55:S16–23.
Elia M, Carter A, Bacon S, Winearls CG, Smith R. Clinical usefulness of urinary 3-methylhistidine excretion in indicating muscle protein breakdown. Brit Med J. 1981;282:351–4.
Sawada A, Yoshikawa Y, Yamauchi M, Watanabe A, Yamakage M. Efficacy of glucose infusion for the inhibition of breakdown of fat tissue and muscle protein under remifentanil anesthesia (in Japanese with English abstract). Masui (Jpn J Anesthesiol). 2012;61:358–63.
Yamasaki K, Inagaki Y, Mochida S, Funaki K, Takahashi S, Sakamoto S. Effect of intraoperative Ringer’s solution with 1 % glucose on glucose and protein metabolism. J Anesth. 2010;24:426–31.
Nagasawa T, Yoshizawa F, Nishizawa N. Plasma N-methylhistidine concentration is a sensitive index of myofibrillar protein degradation during starvation in rats. Biosci Biotech Biochem. 1996;60:501–2.
Acknowledgments
We thank Ms. Saya Sonoda for technical assistance with measurements of urinary metabolites, and Dr. Kazuhiko Fukatsu and Dr. Atsunori Nakao for critical comments and valuable suggestions. This study was supported by Grants-in-Aid for Researchers, Hyogo College of Medicine, 2009.
Conflict of interest
The authors have no conflicts of interest.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
About this article
Cite this article
Nagao, Y., Tatara, T., Fujita, K. et al. Protein sparing during general anesthesia with a propofol solution containing medium-chain triglycerides for gastrectomy: comparison with sevoflurane anesthesia. J Anesth 27, 359–365 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00540-012-1546-8
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00540-012-1546-8