Abstract
Purpose
During performance of direct laryngoscopy in the difficult-to-visualize airway, several maneuvers have the potential to impact glottic visualization, including jaw thrust and cricoid pressure. The effect of these maneuvers on glottic visualization during videolaryngoscopy has not been studied. We evaluated the effect of jaw thrust and cricoid pressure maneuvers on both visualization of the glottis and the area of glottic opening visible during GlideScope-aided videolaryngoscopy.
Methods
One hundred patients were enrolled in this study. After induction of general anesthesia, videolaryngoscopy was followed by jaw thrust and cricoid pressure maneuvers performed in random order. Laryngeal anatomy was recorded continuously and was saved as digital images following the initial laryngoscopy and after each maneuver. Glottis grade [modified Cormack and Lehane (C&L)] was recorded, as was the total glottic area.
Results
There was improvement in glottis grade when utilizing jaw thrust maneuver in comparison to GlideScope videolaryngoscopy alone (31% improved, 4% worsened; P < 0.001). There was no difference in glottis grade when using the cricoid pressure maneuver in comparison with videolaryngoscopy alone (39% improved, 20% worsened; P = 0.19). Glottic opening area, however, was greater when utilizing the jaw thrust maneuver in comparison with videolaryngoscopy alone (P < 0.001), but smaller when utilizing the cricoid pressure maneuver in comparison with videolaryngoscopy alone (P < 0.001).
Conclusions
The jaw thrust maneuver was superior to videolaryngoscopy alone in improving the modified C&L grade and the visualized glottic area; however, no significant improvement was noted with cricoid pressure. We therefore recommend the use of jaw thrust as a first-line maneuver to aid in glottic visualization and tracheal intubation during GlideScope videolaryngoscopy.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Cormack RS, Lehane J. Difficult tracheal intubation in obstetrics. Anaesthesia. 1984;39:1105–11.
Yentis SM, Lee DJ. Evaluation of an improved scoring system for the grading of direct laryngoscopy. Anaesthesia. 1998;53:1041–4.
Levitan RM, Kinkle WC, Levin WJ, Everett WW. Laryngeal view during laryngoscopy: a randomized trial comparing cricoid pressure, backward-upward-rightward pressure, and bimanual laryngoscopy. Ann Emerg Med. 2006;47:548–55.
Takahata O, Kubota M, Mamiya K, Akama Y, Nozaka T, Matsumoto H, Ogawa H. The efficacy of the “BURP” maneuver during a difficult laryngoscopy. Anesth Analg. 1997;84:419–21.
Schmitt HJ, Mang H. Head and neck elevation beyond the sniffing position improves laryngeal view in cases of difficult direct laryngoscopy. J Clin Anesth. 2002;14:335–8.
Hsu WT, Hsu SC, Lee YL, Huang JS, Chen CL. Penetrating injury of the soft palate during GlideScope intubation. Anesth Analg. 2007;104:1609–10.
Malik AM, Frogel JK. Anterior tonsillar pillar perforation during Glidescope video laryngoscopy. Anesth Analg. 2007;104:1610–1.
Cooper RM. Complications associated with the use of the Glidescope videolaryngoscope. Can J Anesth. 2007;54:54–7.
Chin KJ, Arango MF, Paez AF, Turkstra TP. Palatal injury associated with the GlideScope. Anaesth Intensive Care. 2007;35:449–50.
Vincent RD Jr, Wimberly MP, Brockwell RC, Magnuson JS. Soft palate perforation during orotracheal intubation facilitated by the GlideScope videolaryngoscope. J Clin Anesth. 2007;19:619–21.
Hsu WT, Tsao SL, Chen KY, Chou WK. Penetrating injury of the palatoglossal arch associated with use of the GlideScope videolaryngoscope in a flame burn patient. Acta Anaesthesiol Taiwan. 2008;46(1):39–41.
Pacey JA. Anterior tonsillar pillar perforation during GlideScope videolaryngoscopy. Anesth Analg. 2007;104:1611.
Hirabayashi Y, Otsuka Y. Apparent blind spot with the GlideScope video laryngoscope (Letter). Br J Anaesth. 2009;103:461–2.
Cooper RM, Pacey JA, Bishop MJ, McCluskey SA. Early clinical experience with a new videolaryngoscope (GlideScope) in 728 patients. Can J Anesth. 2005;52:191–8.
Doyle DJ, Zura A, Ramachandran M. Videolaryngoscopy in the management of the difficult airway (Letter). Can J Anesth. 2004;51:95.
Dupanovic M, Diachun CA, Isaacson SA, Layer D. Intubation with the GlideScope videolaryngoscope using the “gear stick technique” (Letter). Can J Anesth. 2006;53:213–4.
Dow WA, Parsons DG. Reverse loading to facilitate Glidescope intubation. Can J Anesth. 2007;54:161–2.
Kramer DC, Osborn IP. More maneuvers to facilitate tracheal intubation with the GlideScope. Can J Anesth. 2006;53:737.
Serocki G, Bein B, Scholz J, Dorges V. Management of the predicted difficult airway: a comparison of conventional blade laryngoscopy with video-assisted blade laryngoscopy and the GlideScope. Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2010;27:24–30.
Kim JT, Na HS, Bae JY, Kim DW, Kim HS, Kim CS, Kim SD. Glidescope video laryngoscope: a randomized clinical trial in 203 paediatric patients. Br J Anaesth. 2008;101(4):531–4.
Ochroch EA, Hollander JE, Kush S, Shofer FS, Levitan RM. Assessment of laryngeal view: percentage of glottic opening score vs Cormack and Lehane grading. Can J Anesth. 1999;46:987–90.
Conflict of interest
All authors have no conflict of interest.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
About this article
Cite this article
Corda, D.M., Riutort, K.T., Leone, A.J. et al. Effect of jaw thrust and cricoid pressure maneuvers on glottic visualization during GlideScope videolaryngoscopy. J Anesth 26, 362–368 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00540-012-1339-0
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00540-012-1339-0