Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Comparison of the effects of fentanyl, remifentanil, and dexmedetomidine on neuromuscular blockade

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Journal of Anesthesia Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

The aim of our study was to compare the effects of fentanyl, remifentanil, and dexmedetomidine on neuromuscular blockade under sevoflurane anesthesia.

Methods

Eighty-four patients were randomized to fentanyl, remifentanil, and dexmedetomidine groups. In the fentanyl group, fentanyl 1.5 μg/kg was given before induction of anesthesia, and additional 50-μg boluses were administered. In the remifentanil group, the initial dose of remifentanil 1 μg/kg was infused in 10 min before induction and 0.1 μg/kg/min infusion was continued during anesthesia. In the dexmedetomidine group, the initial dose of dexmedetomidine 1 μg/kg was infused in 10 min before induction and 1 μg/kg/h infusion was continued during anesthesia. Heart rate, blood pressure, SpO2, EtCO2, and TOF (train-of-four) values of all patients were monitored during anesthesia. Times to reach TOF 0 and TOF 25% and intubation quality were recorded.

Results

T 0 times and quality of intubation were found to be similar among the groups. T 25 time was found to be significantly longer in the dexmedetomidine group than in the fentanyl and remifentanil groups.

Conclusion

Dexmedetomidine infusion increased the duration of neuromuscular blockade with vecuronium during general anesthesia. In addition to analgesic and sedative effects, dexmedetomidine may enhance the duration of neuromuscular blockade and may be used as an adjuvant anesthetic during general anesthesia.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Talke PO, Caldwell JE, Richardson CA, Kirkegaard-Nielsen H, Stafford M. The effects of dexmedetomidine on neuromuscular blockade in human volunteers. Anesth Analg. 1999;88:633–9.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Weinger MB, Partridge BL, Henry AF. Dexmedetomidine does not modify the neuromuscular blocking action of vecuronium in the anaesthetized rat. Br J Anaesth. 1995;74:455–7.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Viby-Mogensen J, Engbaek J, Eriksson LI, Gramstad L, Jensen E, Jensen FS, Koscielniak-Nielsen Z, Skovgaard LT, Ostergaard D. Good clinical research practice (GCRP) in pharmacodynamic studies of neuromuscular blocking agents. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 1996;40:59–74.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Savarese JJ, Caldwell JE, Lien CA, Miller RD. Pharmacology of muscle relaxants and their antagonists. In: Miller RD, editor. Anesthesia. 5th ed. Philadelphia: Churchill Livingstone; 2000. p. 412–90.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Nakahara T, Akazawa T, Kinoshita Y, Nozaki J. The effect of clonidine on the duration of vecuronium-induced neuromuscular blockade in humans. Masui. 1995;44:1458–63.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Takahashi H, Nishikawa T. Oral clonidine does not alter vecuronium neuromuscular blockade in anaesthetized patients. Can J Anaesth. 1995;42:511–5.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Donati F. Onset of action of relaxants. Can J Anaesth. 1988;35:S52–8.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Belleville JP, Ward DS, Bloor BC, Maze M. Effects of IV dexmedetomidine in humans. I. Sedation, ventilation, and metabolic rate. Anesthesiology. 1992;77:1125–33.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Aho M, Lehtinen AM, Erkola O, Kallio A, Korttila K. The effect of IV administered dexmedetomidine on perioperative hemodynamics and isoflurane requirements in patients undergoing abdominal hysterectomy. Anesthesiology. 1991;74:997–1002.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Bloor BC, Ward DS, Belleville JP, Maze M. Effects of IV dexmedetomidine in humans. II. Hemodynamic changes. Anesthesiology. 1992;77:1134–42.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Lawrence CJ, Prinzen FW, de Lange S. The effect of dexmedetomidine on nutrient organ blood flow. Anesth Analg. 1996;83:1160–5.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Weinger MB, Segal IS, Maze M. Dexmedetomidine, acting through central alpha-2 adrenoceptors, prevents opiate-induced muscle rigidity in the rat. Anesthesiology. 1989;71:242–9.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Mantz J, Josserand J, Hamada S. Dexmedetomidine: new insights. Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2011;28:3–6.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Narimatsu E, Niiya T, Kawamata M, Namiki A. Lack in effects of therapeutic concentrations of dexmedetomidine and clonidine on the neuromuscular blocking action of rocuronium in isolated rat diaphragms. Anesth Analg. 2007;104:1116–20.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Musgrave IF, Krautwurst D, Schultz G. Imidazoline binding sites and signal transduction pathways. Clin Exp Pharmacol Physiol. 1996;23:990–4.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Abelson KS, Hoglund AU. The effects of the alpha2-adrenergic receptor agonists clonidine and rilmenidine, and antagonists yohimbine and efaroxan, on the spinal cholinergic receptor system in the rat. Basic Clin Pharmacol Toxicol. 2004;94:153–60.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ayse Ozcan.

About this article

Cite this article

Ozcan, A., Ozcan, N., Gulec, H. et al. Comparison of the effects of fentanyl, remifentanil, and dexmedetomidine on neuromuscular blockade. J Anesth 26, 196–199 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00540-011-1270-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00540-011-1270-9

Keywords

Navigation