Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Citation classics in main pain research journals

  • Special Article
  • Published:
Journal of Anesthesia Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The number of citations of an article in scientific journals reflects its impact on a specific biomedical field and its recognition in the scientific community. In the present study, we identified and analyzed the characteristics of the 100 most frequently cited articles published between 1970 and 2010 in journals pertaining to pain research and related fields. These articles were identified using the database of the Science Citation Index (1970 to present). The most cited article received 3,017 citations and the least cited article received 302 citations, with a mean of 585 citations per article. These citation classics were published in six high-impact journals, led by Pain (84 articles). Of the 100 articles, 39 were observational studies, 25 were review articles, and 20 concerned basic science. The articles originated from 14 countries, with the United States contributing 47 articles; 67 institutions produced these 100 top-cited articles, led by National Institutes of Health of the United States (8 articles) and University College London (6 articles); 18 persons authored 2 or more of the top-cited articles. This analysis of the top citation classics allows for the recognition of major advances in pain research and gives a historical perspective on the scientific progress of this specialty.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Bibliometrics (homepage). Available: http://www.gslis.utexas.edu/~palmquis/courses/biblio.html (accessed 2009 June 30).

  2. Baltussen A, Kindler CH. Citation classics in anesthetic journals. Anesth Analg. 2004;98:443–51.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Baltussen A, Kindler CH. Citation classics in critical care medicine. Intensive Care Med. 2004;30:902–10.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Hennessey K, Afshar K, Macneily AE. The top 100 cited articles in urology. Can Urol Assoc J. 2009;3:293–302.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. Paladugu R, Schein M, Gardezi S, Wise L. One hundred citation classics in general surgical journals. World J Surg. 2002;26:1099–105.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Picknett T, Davis K. The 100 most-cited articles from JMB. J Mol Biol. 1999;293:171–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Hall GM. BJA citation classics 1945–1992. Br J Anaesth. 1998;80:4–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Dubin D, Hafner AW, Arndt KA. Citation classics in clinical dermatologic journals. Citation analysis, biomedical journals, and landmark articles, 1945–1990. Arch Dermatol. 1993;129:1121–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Campbell FM. National bias: a comparison of citation practices by health professionals. Bull Med Libr Assoc. 1990;78:376–82.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. Lin AM. US and non-US submissions. JAMA. 1998;280:246–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Garfield E. 100 citation classics from the Journal of the American Medical Association. JAMA. 1987;257:52–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Marx W, Schier H, Wanitschek M. Citation analysis using online databases: feasibilities and shortcomings. Scientometrics. 2001;52:59–82.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Conflict of interest

none.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Wei-Feng Yu.

About this article

Cite this article

Li, Z., Wu, FX., Yang, LQ. et al. Citation classics in main pain research journals. J Anesth 26, 85–93 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00540-011-1254-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00540-011-1254-9

Keywords

Navigation