Abstract
The number of citations of an article in scientific journals reflects its impact on a specific biomedical field and its recognition in the scientific community. In the present study, we identified and analyzed the characteristics of the 100 most frequently cited articles published between 1970 and 2010 in journals pertaining to pain research and related fields. These articles were identified using the database of the Science Citation Index (1970 to present). The most cited article received 3,017 citations and the least cited article received 302 citations, with a mean of 585 citations per article. These citation classics were published in six high-impact journals, led by Pain (84 articles). Of the 100 articles, 39 were observational studies, 25 were review articles, and 20 concerned basic science. The articles originated from 14 countries, with the United States contributing 47 articles; 67 institutions produced these 100 top-cited articles, led by National Institutes of Health of the United States (8 articles) and University College London (6 articles); 18 persons authored 2 or more of the top-cited articles. This analysis of the top citation classics allows for the recognition of major advances in pain research and gives a historical perspective on the scientific progress of this specialty.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Bibliometrics (homepage). Available: http://www.gslis.utexas.edu/~palmquis/courses/biblio.html (accessed 2009 June 30).
Baltussen A, Kindler CH. Citation classics in anesthetic journals. Anesth Analg. 2004;98:443–51.
Baltussen A, Kindler CH. Citation classics in critical care medicine. Intensive Care Med. 2004;30:902–10.
Hennessey K, Afshar K, Macneily AE. The top 100 cited articles in urology. Can Urol Assoc J. 2009;3:293–302.
Paladugu R, Schein M, Gardezi S, Wise L. One hundred citation classics in general surgical journals. World J Surg. 2002;26:1099–105.
Picknett T, Davis K. The 100 most-cited articles from JMB. J Mol Biol. 1999;293:171–6.
Hall GM. BJA citation classics 1945–1992. Br J Anaesth. 1998;80:4–6.
Dubin D, Hafner AW, Arndt KA. Citation classics in clinical dermatologic journals. Citation analysis, biomedical journals, and landmark articles, 1945–1990. Arch Dermatol. 1993;129:1121–9.
Campbell FM. National bias: a comparison of citation practices by health professionals. Bull Med Libr Assoc. 1990;78:376–82.
Lin AM. US and non-US submissions. JAMA. 1998;280:246–7.
Garfield E. 100 citation classics from the Journal of the American Medical Association. JAMA. 1987;257:52–9.
Marx W, Schier H, Wanitschek M. Citation analysis using online databases: feasibilities and shortcomings. Scientometrics. 2001;52:59–82.
Conflict of interest
none.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
About this article
Cite this article
Li, Z., Wu, FX., Yang, LQ. et al. Citation classics in main pain research journals. J Anesth 26, 85–93 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00540-011-1254-9
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00540-011-1254-9