Skip to main content
Log in

Utility of the ProSeal laryngeal mask airway creating a 90° angle with an intubating stylet

  • Letter to the Editor
  • Published:
Journal of Anesthesia Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

References

  1. Brimacombe J, Keller C, Fullekrug B, Agro F, Rosenblatt W, Dierdorf SF, de Lucas EG, Capodevilla X, Brimacombe N. A multicenter study comparing the ProSeal and classic laryngeal mask airway in anesthetized, nonparalyzed patients. Anesthesiology. 2002;96:289–95.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Yodfat UA. Modified technique for laryngeal mask airway insertion. Anesth Analg. 1999;89:1327.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Jaffe RA, Brock-Utne JG. A modification of the Yodfat laryngeal mask airway insertion technique. J Clin Anesth. 2002;14:462–3.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Lee LW. Insertion of the LMA ProSeal using the Satin-Slip intubating stylet. Can J Anaesth. 2007;54:81–2.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Vaida SJ, Yodfat UA. Angulation of the airway tube in the AMBU laryngeal mask could be responsible for improved insertion success. Anesth Analg. 2006;103:264.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ryu Okutani.

About this article

Cite this article

Okutani, R., Ogawa, S. Utility of the ProSeal laryngeal mask airway creating a 90° angle with an intubating stylet. J Anesth 24, 492–493 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00540-010-0883-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00540-010-0883-8

Keywords

Navigation