Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Time progression from the patient’s operating room entrance to incision: factors affecting anesthetic setup and surgical preparation times

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Journal of Anesthesia Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

Owing to recent advances in surgical technology, substantial time is required for preparing surgical equipment before incision. The purpose of this study was to demonstrate the time progression from a patient’s operating room entrance to incision and to evaluate the duration of each anesthetic procedure and surgical preparation.

Methods

We marked the following seven points on the anesthetic chart: (1) entrance; (2) IV line placement; (3) preoxygenation; (4) intubation; (5) completion of patient positioning (Anesth-Set); (6) applying antiseptic solution; and (7) incision. Afterward, we analyzed the event time periods according to anesthetic procedure, patient position, surgical service, and surgical procedure (such as the utilization of endoscopy, navigation systems, and sentinel lymph node biopsy).

Results

On average, it took approximately 3 min to start IV placement, 7 min until preoxygenation, 15 min until intubation, and 30 min until Anesth-Set. Epidural, arterial, and central venous catheterization required 15, 9, and 13 min, respectively. It took 20 min from Anesth-Set to incision, on average; 22, 4, and 5 min were required to prepare the navigation system, endoscope, and sentinel lymph node biopsy, respectively. In total, it took an average of 49.8 ± 17.1 min from entrance to incision, which was significantly longer (30.4 ± 8.8 min) than it took in 1985–1986.

Conclusion

The mean time taken from the patient’s operating room entrance to incision is now significantly longer than before. This may be attributed, at least in part, to the preparation of equipment associated with new surgical technologies.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Overdyk FJ, Harvey SC, Fisherman RL, Shippey F. Successful strategies for improving operating room efficiency at academic institutions. Anesth Analg. 1998;86:896–906.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Zafar SU, Khan FA, Khan M. Standardization of anaesthesia ready time and reasons of delay in induction of anaesthesia. J Pak Med Assoc. 2006;56:112–115.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Donham RT. Defining measurable OR-PR scheduling, efficiency, and utilization data elements: the Association of Anesthesia Clinical Directors procedural times glossary. Int Anesthesiol Clin. 1998;36:15–29.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Albrecht DM, Dahmen KG. An approach to quality management in anaesthesia: a focus on perioperative care and outcome. Eur J Anaesthesiol Suppl. 2001;23:4–9.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Abouleish AE, Prough DS, Zornow MH, Hughes J, Whitten CW, Conlay LA, Abate JJ, Horn TE. The impact of longer-than-average anesthesia times on the billing of academic anesthesiology departments. Anesth Analg. 2001;93:1537–1543.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Chelly JE, Greger J, Al Samsam T, Gebhard R, Masson M, Matuszczak M, Sciard D. Reduction of operating and recovery room times and overnight hospital stays with interscalene blocks as sole anesthetic technique for rotator cuff surgery. Minerva Anesthesiol. 2001;67:613–619.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

About this article

Cite this article

Sasano, N., Morita, M., Sugiura, T. et al. Time progression from the patient’s operating room entrance to incision: factors affecting anesthetic setup and surgical preparation times. J Anesth 23, 230–234 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00540-008-0713-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00540-008-0713-4

Key words

Navigation