Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

In-line head and neck position is preferable for tracheal intubation with the Airtraq laryngoscope compared to the sniffing position

  • Short Communication
  • Published:
Journal of Anesthesia Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

We aimed to determine which position, the in-line head and neck position or the sniffing position, was preferable for tracheal intubation with the Airtraq laryngoscope. In all, 20 anesthetists performed tracheal intubations on a manikin with either an in-line head and neck position or the sniffing position. There were no differences in the success rate and the time to intubation between the two positions. The overall number of teeth clicks was lower in the in-line head and neck position than in the sniffing position (P < 0.05). The score for preference of position, on a visual analogue scale, was better for the in-line head and neck position than for the sniffing position (P < 0.01). We concluded that the in-line head and neck position was preferable for tracheal intubation with the Airtraq laryngoscope compared to the sniffing position.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Maharaj CH, Higgins BD, Harte BH, Laffey JG. Evaluation of intubation using the Airtraq or Macintosh laryngoscope by anaesthetists in easy and simulated difficult laryngoscopy-a manikin study. Anaesthesia. 2006;61:469–477.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Maharaj CH, O’Croinin D, Curley G, Harte BH, Laffey JG. A comparison of tracheal intubation using the Airtraq or the Macintosh laryngoscope in routine airway management: a randomised, controlled clinical trial. Anaesthesia. 2006;61:1093–1099.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Maharaj CH, Costello JF, McDonnell JG, Harte BH, Laffey JG. The Airtraq as a rescue airway device following failed direct laryngoscopy: a case series. Anaesthesia. 2007;62:598–601.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Black JJ. Emergency use of the Airtraq laryngoscope in traumatic asphyxia: case report. Emerg Med J. 2007;24:509–510.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Anesthesiology and Critical Care Medicine, Jichi Medical University, 3311-1 Yakushiji, Shimotsuke, Tochigi, 329-0498, Japan

    Yoshihiro Hirabayashi & Norimasa Seo

Authors
  1. Yoshihiro Hirabayashi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Norimasa Seo
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

About this article

Cite this article

Hirabayashi, Y., Seo, N. In-line head and neck position is preferable for tracheal intubation with the Airtraq laryngoscope compared to the sniffing position. J Anesth 22, 189–190 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00540-007-0601-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00540-007-0601-3

Key words

Search

Navigation