Skip to main content
Log in

Informed consent for anesthesia: survey of current practices in Japan

  • Published:
Journal of Anesthesia Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Anesthesia requires informed consent because it is an invasive procedure with certain risks. However, the state of informed consent for anesthesia in Japan remains unclear. The purpose of this survey was to examine the state of informed consent for anesthesia in Japan. A questionnaire was sent to all hospitals certified by the Japanese Society of Anesthesiologists (n = 854). The questionnaire consisted of four sections: explanation of the anesthesia, method of documentation, consent for anesthesia, and other information such as the hospital's size. A total of 504 (59.0%) questionnaires were completed and returned. At 96.7% of hospitals, an anesthesiologist would explain the scheduled anesthesia. Most departments provide an explanation of dental damage, malignant hyperthermia, and nausea/vomiting. Explanation of anesthesia was standardized at 59.0% of hospitals. A written description was handed out to patients routinely at 61.3% of hospitals. Although consent for anesthesia was obtained at more than 90% of departments, only 59.9% of departments would keep records of having obtained consent. This survey found that the explanation of anesthesia varied among hospitals and was not standardized in Japan. Further attention is needed on how to improve the documentation of informed consent.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. DB Waisel RD Truog (1997) ArticleTitleInformed consent Anesthesiology 87 968–978 Occurrence Handle10.1097/00000542-199710000-00033 Occurrence Handle9357901

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. S Maeda (2003) An introduction to law EditionNumber3rd edn. Medical Association Research Institute Tokyo 49–63

    Google Scholar 

  3. SM White TJ Baldwin (2003) ArticleTitleConsent for anaesthesia Anaesthesia 58 760–774 Occurrence Handle10.1046/j.1365-2044.2003.03202.x Occurrence Handle12859468

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. KB Domino TA Bowdle KL Posner PH Spitellie LA Lee FW Cheney (2004) ArticleTitleInjuries and liability related to central vascular catheters: a closed claims analysis Anesthesiology 100 1411–1418 Occurrence Handle10.1097/00000542-200406000-00013 Occurrence Handle15166560

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Australian and New Zealand College of Anaesthetists (2003) Recommendations on the pre-anaesthesia consultation. ANZCA professional document PS7

  6. K Jenkins AB Baker (2003) ArticleTitleConsent and anaesthesic risk Anaesthesia 58 962–984 Occurrence Handle10.1046/j.1365-2044.2003.03410.x Occurrence Handle12969038

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. E Osuna MD Perez-Carceles JA Perez-Moreno A Luna (1998) ArticleTitleInformed consent: evaluation of the information provided to patients before anaesthesia and surgery Med Law 17 511–518 Occurrence Handle10396913

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. EJ Watkins LJ Milligan HA O'Beirne (2001) ArticleTitleInformation and consent for anaesthesia: a postal survey of current practice in Great Britain Anaesthesia 56 879–905 Occurrence Handle10.1046/j.1365-2044.2001.02059.x Occurrence Handle11531676

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Association of Anaesthetists of Great Britain and Ireland (AAGBI) (1999) Information and consent for anaesthesia. www.aagbi.org

  10. IH Chapman (1997) ArticleTitleInformed consent: survey of Auckland, N.Z. anaesthetists' practice and attitudes Anaesth Intensive Care 25 671–674 Occurrence Handle9452852

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

About this article

Cite this article

Sakaguchi, M., Maeda, S. Informed consent for anesthesia: survey of current practices in Japan. J Anesth 19, 315–319 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00540-005-0332-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00540-005-0332-2

Key words

Navigation