Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Machine learning-based model for prediction and feature analysis of recurrence in pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors G1/G2

  • Original Article―Liver, Pancreas, and Biliary Tract
  • Published:
Journal of Gastroenterology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Pancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms (PanNENs) are a heterogeneous group of tumors. Although the prognosis of resected PanNENs is generally considered to be good, a relatively high recurrence rate has been reported. Given the scarcity of large-scale reports about PanNEN recurrence due to their rarity, we aimed to identify the predictors for recurrence in patients with resected PanNENs to improve prognosis.

Methods

We established a multicenter database of 573 patients with PanNENs, who underwent resection between January 1987 and July 2020 at 22 Japanese centers, mainly in the Kyushu region. We evaluated the clinical characteristics of 371 patients with localized non-functioning pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (G1/G2). We also constructed a machine learning-based prediction model to analyze the important features to determine recurrence.

Results

Fifty-two patients experienced recurrence (14.0%) during the follow-up period, with the median time of recurrence being 33.7 months. The random survival forest (RSF) model showed better predictive performance than the Cox proportional hazards regression model in terms of the Harrell’s C-index (0.841 vs. 0.820). The Ki-67 index, residual tumor, WHO grade, tumor size, and lymph node metastasis were the top five predictors in the RSF model; tumor size above 20 mm was the watershed with increased recurrence probability, whereas the 5-year disease-free survival rate decreased linearly as the Ki-67 index increased.

Conclusions

Our study revealed the characteristics of resected PanNENs in real-world clinical practice. Machine learning techniques can be powerful analytical tools that provide new insights into the relationship between the Ki-67 index or tumor size and recurrence.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

Conflict of interest The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.References

  1. Yao JC, Hassan M, Phan A, et al. One hundred years after “carcinoid”: epidemiology of and prognostic factors for neuroendocrine tumors in 35,825 cases in the United States. J Clin Oncol. 2008;26:3063–72.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Masui T, Ito T, Komoto I, et al. Recent epidemiology of patients with gastro-entero-pancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms (GEP-NEN) in Japan: a population-based study. BMC Cancer. 2020;20:1104.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. Ito T, Igarashi H, Nakamura K, et al. Epidemiological trends of pancreatic and gastrointestinal neuroendocrine tumors in Japan: a nationwide survey analysis. J Gastroenterol. 2015;50:58–64.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Dasari A, Shen C, Halperin D, et al. Trends in the incidence, prevalence, and survival outcomes in patients with neuroendocrine tumors in the United States. JAMA Oncol. 2017;3:1335–42.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. Gill A, Klimstra D, Lam A, et al. WHO classification of tumours: Digestive system tumours. 5th ed. Lyon: International Agency for Research on Cancer; 2019.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Fujimori N, Miki M, Lee L, et al. Natural history and clinical outcomes of pancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms based on the WHO 2017 classification; a single-center experience of 30 years. Pancreatology. 2020;20:709–15.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Ito T, Masui T, Komoto I, et al. JNETS clinical practice guidelines for gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms: diagnosis, treatment, and follow-up: a synopsis. J Gastroenterol. 2021;56:1033–44.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. Miki M, Oono T, Fujimori N, et al. CLEC3A, MMP7, and LCN2 as novel markers for predicting recurrence in resected G1 and G2 pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors. Cancer Med. 2019;8:3748–60.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. Gao H, Liu L, Wang W, et al. Novel recurrence risk stratification of resected pancreatic neuroendocrine tumor. Cancer Lett. 2018;412:188–93.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Ye L, Ye H, Zhou Q, et al. A retrospective cohort study of pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors at single institution over 15 years: New proposal for low- and high-grade groups, validation of a nomogram for prognosis, and novel follow-up strategy for liver metastases. Int J Surg. 2016;29:108–17.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Landoni L, Marchegiani G, Pollini T, et al. The evolution of surgical strategies for pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (Pan-NENs): time-trend and outcome analysis from 587 consecutive resections at a high-volume institution. Ann Surg. 2019;269:725–32.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Yamamoto Y, Okamura Y, Uemura S, et al. Vascularity and tumor size are significant predictors for recurrence after resection of a pancreatic neuroendocrine tumor. Ann Surg Oncol. 2017;24:2363–70.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Hashim YM, Trinkaus KM, Linehan DC, et al. Regional lymphadenectomy is indicated in the surgical treatment of pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (PNETs). Ann Surg. 2014;259:197–203.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Li Y, Fan G, Yu F, et al. Meta-analysis of prognostic factors for recurrence of resected well-differentiated pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors. Neuroendocrinology. 2021;111:1231–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Tsutsumi K, Ohtsuka T, Fujino M, et al. Analysis of risk factors for recurrence after curative resection of well-differentiated pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors based on the new grading classification. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci. 2014;21:418–25.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Kaneko H, Umakoshi H, Ogata M, et al. Machine learning based models for prediction of subtype diagnosis of primary aldosteronism using blood test. Sci Rep. 2021;11:9140.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. Kaneko H, Umakoshi H, Ogata M, et al. Machine learning-based models for predicting clinical outcomes after surgery in unilateral primary aldosteronism. Sci Rep. 2022;12:5781.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  18. Zhou RQ, Ji HC, Liu Q, et al. Leveraging machine learning techniques for predicting pancreatic neuroendocrine tumor grades using biochemical and tumor markers. World J Clin Cases. 2019;7:1611–22.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  19. Luo Y, Chen X, Chen J, et al. Preoperative prediction of pancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms grading based on enhanced computed tomography imaging: validation of deep learning with a convolutional neural network. Neuroendocrinology. 2020;110:338–50.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Song Y, Gao S, Tan W, et al. Multiple machine learnings revealed similar predictive accuracy for prognosis of PNETs from the surveillance, epidemiology, and end result database. J Cancer. 2018;9:3971–8.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  21. Harris PA, Taylor R, Minor BL, et al. The REDCap consortium: building an international community of software platform partners. J Biomed Inform. 2019;95: 103208.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  22. Harris PA, Taylor R, Thielke R, et al. Research electronic data capture (REDCap)a metadata-driven methodology and workflow process for providing translational research informatics support. J Biomed Inform. 2009;42:377–81.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Murakami M, Fujimori N, Matsumoto K, et al. A clinical analysis on functioning pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (focusing on VIPomas): a single-center experience. Endocr J. 2022. https://doi.org/10.1507/endocrj.EJ22-0111.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. van Buuren S, Groothuis-Oudshoorn K. Mice: multivariate imputation by chained equations in R. J Stat Softw. 2011;45:1–67.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Harrell FE Jr, Califf RM, Pryor DB, et al. Evaluating the yield of medical tests. JAMA. 1982;247:2543–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Kamarudin AN, Cox T, Kolamunnage-Dona R. Time-dependent ROC curve analysis in medical research: current methods and applications. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2017;17:53.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  27. Kronek LP, Reddy A. Logical analysis of survival data: Prognostic survival models by detecting high-degree interactions in right-censored data. Bioinformatics. 2008;24:i248–53.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Chen J, Yang Y, Liu Y, et al. Prognosis analysis of patients with pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors after surgical resection and the application of enucleation. World J Surg Oncol. 2021;19:11.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  29. Zheng-Pywell R, Fang A, AlKashash A, et al. Prognostic impact of tumor size on pancreatic neuroendocrine tumor recurrence may have racial variance. Pancreas. 2021;50:347–52.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  30. Zhang XF, Wu Z, Cloyd J, et al. Margin status and long-term prognosis of primary pancreatic neuroendocrine tumor after curative resection: results from the US neuroendocrine tumor study group. Surgery. 2019;165:548–56.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Kwon W, Jang JY, Song KB, et al. Risk factors for recurrence in pancreatic neuroendocrine tumor and size as a surrogate in determining the treatment strategy: a Korean nationwide study. Neuroendocrinology. 2021;111:794–804.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Dong DH, Zhang XF, Lopez-Aguiar AG, et al. Resection of pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors: defining patterns and time course of recurrence. HPB (Oxford). 2020;22:215–23.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Marchegiani G, Landoni L, Andrianello S, et al. Patterns of recurrence after resection for pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors: who, when, and where? Neuroendocrinology. 2019;108:161–71.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Jilesen AP, van Eijck CH, in’t Hof KH, et al. Postoperative complications, in-hospital mortality and 5-year survival after surgical resection for patients with a pancreatic neuroendocrine tumor: a systematic review. World J Surg. 2016;40:729–48.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Sadot E, Reidy-Lagunes DL, Tang LH, et al. Observation versus resection for small asymptomatic pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors: a matched case-control study. Ann Surg Oncol. 2016;23:1361–70.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Breiman L. Random forests. Mach Learn. 2001;45:5–32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Ishwaran H, Kogalur UB, Blackstone EH, et al. Random survival forests. Ann Appl Stat. 2008. https://doi.org/10.1214/08-AOAS169.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Sakin A, Tambas M, Secmeler S, et al. Factors affecting survival in neuroendocrine tumors: a 15-year single center experience. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev. 2018;19:3597–603.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  39. Lee L, Igarashi H, Fujimori N, et al. Long-term outcomes and prognostic factors in 78 Japanese patients with advanced pancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms: a single-center retrospective study. Jpn J Clin Oncol. 2015;45:1131–8.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank Hiroki Kaneko, Akihisa Ohno, Kazuhide Matsumoto, Katsuhito Teramatsu, and Ayumu Takeno (Department of Medicine and Bioregulatory Science, Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Kyushu University, Fukuoka, Japan), Makoto Hinokuchi, Issei Kojima, and Shiroh Tanoue (Digestive and Lifestyle Diseases, Kagoshima University Graduate School of Medical and Dental Sciences, Kagoshima, Japan), Takao Ohtsuka (Department of Digestive Surgery, Breast and Thyroid Surgery, Kagoshima University Graduate School of Medical and Dental Sciences, Kagoshima, Japan), Motohiro Yoshinari, and Yukiko Uramoto (Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Kumamoto University, Kumamoto, Japan), Kazunari Murakami, Teiziro Hirashita, and Masafumi Inomata (Department of Gastroenterology, Faculty of Medicine, Oita University, Oita, Japan), Yoshihiro Hamada, Naoaki Tsuchiya, Takehiko Koga, Takanori Kitaguchi, Takahide Sasaki, Ryo Nakashima, Fuminori Ishii, and Masatoshi Kajiwara (Department of Gastroenterology and Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Fukuoka University, Fukuoka, Japan), Yasuhisa Ando (Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Kagawa University, Kita-gun, Japan), Yoshinobu Okabe, Hiroya Terabe, and Shingo Hirai (Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Medicine, Kurume University School of Medicine, Kurume, Japan), Yu Takamatsu (Neuroendocrine Tumor Centre, Fukuoka Sanno Hospital, Fukuoka, Japan), Masayuki Hijioka (Department of Gastroenterology, National Hospital Organization Kyushu Cancer Center, Fukuoka, Japan), Yusuke Watanabe (Department of Surgery, Hamanomachi Hospital, Fukuoka, Japan), Toyoma Kaku (Department of Gastroenterology, National Hospital Organization Kyushu Medical Center, Fukuoka, Japan), Yuichi Tachibana (Department of Internal Medicine, Saiseikai Fukuoka General Hospital, Fukuoka, Japan), and Ryuichiro Kimura (Department of Surgery, Miyazaki Prefectural Miyazaki Hospital, Miyazaki, Japan) for their contributions to the study management, and Masayuki Hirose (Center for Clinical and Translational Research at Kyushu University Hospital) for reviewing the statistical methods used in this study. We also thank Editage (http://www.editage.com) for editing the manuscript draft.

Funding

This study was supported in part by JSPS KAKENHI (Grant No. JP22K08079), and the Smoking Research Foundation (Grant No. GAKF800505).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

All authors contributed to the study conception and design, and/or data collection. Data analyses were performed and the first draft of the manuscript was written by MM and NF, and all authors commented on previous versions of the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Nao Fujimori.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary file1 (DOCX 975 KB)

Supplementary file2 (XLSX 17 KB)

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Murakami, M., Fujimori, N., Nakata, K. et al. Machine learning-based model for prediction and feature analysis of recurrence in pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors G1/G2. J Gastroenterol 58, 586–597 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00535-023-01987-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00535-023-01987-8

Keywords

Navigation