Abstract
Background
Self-expanding metallic stent (SEMS) and trans-anal colorectal tube (TCT) are alternative treatments to conventional emergency surgery for non-right-sided obstructive colon cancer (NROCC). However, the one with better short- and long-term outcomes remains controversial. Thus, this multicenter case–control study aimed to analyze and compare SEMS and TCT for NROCC.
Methods
Patients with stage II/III NROCC who underwent surgery between January 2010 and December 2019 at either of the eight selected Japanese affiliate hospitals were, retrospectively, reviewed. Baseline characteristics between the SEMS and TCT groups were adjusted by propensity score (PS) matching.
Results
Among 239 reviewed patients (SEMS: 76, TCT: 163), 180 were finally included in two well-balanced cohorts through PS: SEMS group (65 patients) and TCT group (115 patients). Technical success, clinical success, morbidity, and short-term mortality were not significantly different between the two groups. SEMS placement achieved significantly higher rates for primary resection/anastomosis without stoma (SEMS: 90.8% vs. TCT: 77.4%, p < 0.001) and laparoscopic surgery (SEMS: 64.6% vs. TCT: 43.5%, p < 0.001) than TCT placement. However, 5-year overall survival (SEMS: 83.7% vs. TCT: 86.4%; p = 0.822) and 5-year relapse-free survival (SEMS: 64.7% vs. TCT: 66.4%; p = 0.854) showed no significant differences between these groups.
Conclusions
Both SEMS and TCT revealed similar long-term outcomes, but SEMS placement was better in achieving primary resection/anastomosis and laparoscopic surgery in patients with stage II/III NROCC.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
De Salvo GL, Gava C, Pucciarelli S, et al. Curative surgery for obstruction from primary left colorectal carcinoma: primary or staged resection? Cochrane Database Syst Rev (Review). 2004;2004:CD002101.
McArdle CS, McMillan DC, Hole DJ. The impact of blood loss, obstruction and perforation on survival in patients undergoing curative resection for colon cancer. Br J Surg. 2006;93:483–8.
Okuda Y, Shimura T, Yamada T, et al. Colorectal obstruction is a potential prognostic factor for stage II colorectal cancer. Int J Clin Oncol. 2018;23:1101–11.
Shimura T, Joh T. Evidence-based clinical management of acute malignant colorectal obstruction. J Clin Gastroenterol. 2016;50:273–85.
Phillips RK, Hittinger R, Fry JS, et al. Malignant large bowel obstruction. Br J Surg. 1985;72:296–302.
Okuda Y, Yamada T, Hirata Y, et al. Long-term outcomes of one stage surgery using transanal colorectal tube for acute colorectal obstruction of stage II/III distal colon cancer. Cancer Res Treat. 2019;51:474–82.
van Hooft JE, van Halsema EE, Vanbiervliet G, et al. Self-expandable metal stents for obstructing colonic and extracolonic cancer: European society of gastrointestinal endoscopy (ESGE) clinical guideline. Endoscopy. 2014;46:990–1053.
Tan CJ, Dasari BV, Gardiner K. Systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials of self-expanding metallic stents as a bridge to surgery versus emergency surgery for malignant left-sided large bowel obstruction. Br J Surg. 2012;99:469–76.
Ye GY, Cui Z, Chen L, et al. Colonic stenting vs emergent surgery for acute left-sided malignant colonic obstruction: a systematic review and meta-analysis. World J Gastroenterol. 2012;18:5608–15.
Huang X, Lv B, Zhang S, et al. Preoperative colonic stents versus emergency surgery for acute left-sided malignant colonic obstruction: a meta-analysis. J Gastrointest Surg. 2014;18:584–91.
Alcantara M, Serra-Aracil X, Falco J, et al. Prospective, controlled, randomized study of intraoperative colonic lavage versus stent placement in obstructive left-sided colonic cancer. World J Surg. 2011;35:1904–10.
Ghazal AH, El-Shazly WG, Bessa SS, et al. Colonic endolumenal stenting devices and elective surgery versus emergency subtotal/total colectomy in the management of malignant obstructed left colon carcinoma. J Gastrointest Surg. 2013;17:1123–9.
Sloothaak DA, van den Berg MW, Dijkgraaf MG, et al. Oncological outcome of malignant colonic obstruction in the Dutch Stent-In 2 trial. Br J Surg. 2014;101:1751–7.
Foo CC, Poon SHT, Chiu RHY, et al. Is bridge to surgery stenting a safe alternative to emergency surgery in malignant colonic obstruction: a meta-analysis of randomized control trials. Surg Endosc. 2019;33:293–302.
Yang P, Lin XF, Lin K, et al. The role of stents as bridge to surgery for acute left-sided obstructive colorectal cancer: meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Rev Invest Clin. 2018;70:269–78.
van Hooft JE, Veld JV, Arnold D, et al. Self-expandable metal stents for obstructing colonic and extracolonic cancer: European society of gastrointestinal endoscopy (ESGE) guideline—update 2020. Endoscopy. 2020;52:389–407.
Yamada T, Shimura T, Sakamoto E, et al. Preoperative drainage using a transanal tube enables elective laparoscopic colectomy for obstructive distal colorectal cancer. Endoscopy. 2013;45:265–71.
Vandenbroucke JP, von Elm E, Altman DG, et al. Strengthening the reporting of observational studies in epidemiology (STROBE): explanation and elaboration. Epidemiology. 2007;18:805–35.
Brierley JD, Gospodarowicz MK, Wittekind C. TNM classification of malignant tumours. 8th ed. Oxford, UK; Hoboken, NJ: Wiley; 2017.
Dindo D, Demartines N, Clavien PA. Classification of surgical complications: a new proposal with evaluation in a cohort of 6336 patients and results of a survey. Ann Surg. 2004;240:205–13.
Okuda Y, Shimura T, Kato H, et al. Pathological impact of transanal colorectal tube for obstructive colorectal cancer. Surg Endosc. 2020;34:4011–8.
Malgras B, Brulle L, Lo Dico R, et al. Insertion of a stent in obstructive colon cancer can induce a metastatic process in an experimental murine model. Ann Surg Oncol. 2015;22(Suppl 3):S1475–80.
Sabbagh C, Chatelain D, Trouillet N, et al. Does use of a metallic colon stent as a bridge to surgery modify the pathology data in patients with colonic obstruction? A case-matched study. Surg Endosc. 2013;27:3622–31.
Kim HJ, Choi GS, Park JS, et al. Higher rate of perineural invasion in stent-laparoscopic approach in comparison to emergent open resection for obstructing left-sided colon cancer. Int J Colorectal Dis. 2013;28:407–14.
Takahashi G, Yamada T, Iwai T, et al. Oncological assessment of stent placement for obstructive colorectal cancer from circulating cell-free DNA and circulating tumor DNA dynamics. Ann Surg Oncol. 2018;25:737–44.
Matsuda A, Miyashita M, Matsumoto S, et al. Colonic stent-induced mechanical compression may suppress cancer cell proliferation in malignant large bowel obstruction. Surg Endosc. 2019;33:1290–7.
Lee YJ, Yoon JY, Park JJ, et al. Clinical outcomes and factors related to colonic perforations in patients receiving self-expandable metal stent insertion for malignant colorectal obstruction. Gastrointest Endosc. 2018;87:1548-1557e1.
Suzuki Y, Moritani K, Seo Y, et al. Comparison of decompression tubes with metallic stents for the management of right-sided malignant colonic obstruction. World J Gastroenterol. 2019;25:1975–85.
Endo S, Kumamoto K, Enomoto T, et al. Comparison of survival and perioperative outcome of the colonic stent and the transanal decompression tube placement and emergency surgery for left-sided obstructive colorectal cancer: a retrospective multi-center observational study “The CODOMO study.” Int J Colorectal Dis. 2021;36:987–98.
Sato K, Imaizumi K, Kasajima H, et al. Short- and long-term outcomes of a self-expandable metallic stent versus a transanal decompression tube for pathological stage II and III left-sided obstructive colorectal cancer: a retrospective observational study. Surg Today. 2022;52:268–77.
Kagami S, Funahashi K, Ushigome M, et al. Comparative study between colonic metallic stent and anal tube decompression for Japanese patients with left-sided malignant large bowel obstruction. World J Surg Oncol. 2018;16:210.
Sato R, Oikawa M, Kakita T, et al. Comparison of the long-term outcomes of the self-expandable metallic stent and transanal decompression tube for obstructive colorectal cancer. Ann Gastroenterol Surg. 2019;3:209–16.
Inoue H, Arita T, Kuriu Y, et al. Emergency management of obstructive colorectal cancer—a retrospective study of efficacy and safety in self-expanding metallic stents and trans-anal tubes. In Vivo. 2021;35:2289–96.
Matsuda A, Yamada T, Matsumoto S, et al. Short-term outcomes of a self-expandable metallic stent as a bridge to surgery vs. a transanal decompression tube for malignant large-bowel obstruction: a meta-analysis. Surg Today. 2019;49:728–37.
Takeyama H, Kitani K, Wakasa T, et al. Self-expanding metallic stent improves histopathologic edema compared with transanal drainage tube for malignant colorectal obstruction. Dig Endosc. 2016;28:456–64.
Funding
The authors received no specific funding for this work.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
Conceptualization: TS. Acquisition of data: YO, KU, TN, YT, YI, KN, EU, YN, NS, SF, HI, TK. Analysis and interpretation of data: YO, TS. Writing—original draft preparation: YO. Writing—review and editing: TS. Statistical analysis: YO, TS. Administrative support: TS, TY, TM, KI, TO, ME, SN, ST. Supervision: HK.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
All authors declare no conflicts of interest.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Supplementary Information
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Okuda, Y., Shimura, T., Uno, K. et al. A multicenter case–control study of self-expanding metallic stent versus trans-anal colorectal tube for stage II/III non-right-sided obstructive colon cancer. J Gastroenterol 58, 217–228 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00535-022-01952-x
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00535-022-01952-x