Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Pathogenic effects of Desulfovibrio in the gut on fatty liver in diet-induced obese mice and children with obesity

  • Original Article—Liver, Pancreas, and Biliary Tract
  • Published:
Journal of Gastroenterology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Although we know the key role of gut dysbiosis in nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD), it remains unclear what microbe(s) are responsible. This study aims to identify the microbes that cause NAFLD.

Methods

C57BL/6JNarl male mice fed a high-fat diet (HFD) were orally administered Lactobacillus reuteri (L. reuteri) or Lactobacillus rhamnosus GG plus Bifidobacterium animalis subsp. lactis BB12 (LGG plus BB12). Their fecal microbiomes identified by 16S rRNA sequencing were correlated with the severity of fatty liver. We then used a human cohort to confirm the role of the microbe(s). The HFD-fed mice were administrated with the identified bacterium, Desulfovibrio. The histopathological changes in the liver and ileum were analyzed.

Results

Lactobacillus and Bifidobacterium improved hepatic steatosis and fibrosis in HFD-fed mice, which was related to the decreased abundance of Desulfovibrio in feces. Further human study confirmed the amount of D. piger in the fecal microbiota of obese children with NAFLD was increased. We then administered D. piger and found aggravated hepatic steatosis and fibrosis in HFD-fed mice. Hepatic expression of CD36 was significantly increased in HFD-fed mice gavaged with D. piger. In HepG2 cells, overexpression of CD36 increased lipid droplets, whereas knockdown of CD36 decreased lipid droplets. HFD-fed mice gavaged with D. piger had a decrease in the villus length, crypt depth, and zonula occludens-1 density in the ileum tissue.

Conclusions

Our findings provide novel insights into the role of Desulfovibrio dysregulation in NAFLD. Modulation of Desulfovibrio may be a potential target for the treatment of NAFLD.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Nobili V, Alisi A, Newton KP, et al. Comparison of the phenotype and approach to pediatric vs adult patients with nonalcoholic fatty liver disease. Gastroenterology. 2016;150:1798–810.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Fabbrini E, Sullivan S, Klein S. Obesity and nonalcoholic fatty liver disease: biochemical, metabolic, and clinical implications. Hepatology. 2010;51:679–89.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Sanyal AJ, Campbell-Sargent C, Mirshahi F, et al. Nonalcoholic steatohepatitis: association of insulin resistance and mitochondrial abnormalities. Gastroenterology. 2001;120:1183–92.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Boursier J, Diehl AM. Implication of gut microbiota in nonalcoholic fatty liver disease. PLoS Pathog. 2015;11: e1004559.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Schwimmer JB, Johnson JS, Angeles JE, et al. Microbiome signatures associated with steatohepatitis and moderate to severe fibrosis in children with nonalcoholic fatty liver disease. Gastroenterology. 2019;157:1109–22.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Loomba R, Seguritan V, Li W, et al. Gut microbiome-based metagenomic signature for non-invasive detection of advanced fibrosis in human nonalcoholic fatty liver disease. Cell Metab. 2017;25(1054–62): e5.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Raman M, Ahmed I, Gillevet PM, et al. Fecal microbiome and volatile organic compound metabolome in obese humans with nonalcoholic fatty liver disease. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2013;11(868–75):e1-3.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Boursier J, Mueller O, Barret M, et al. The severity of nonalcoholic fatty liver disease is associated with gut dysbiosis and shift in the metabolic function of the gut microbiota. Hepatology. 2016;63:764–75.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Del Chierico F, Nobili V, Vernocchi P, et al. Gut microbiota profiling of pediatric nonalcoholic fatty liver disease and obese patients unveiled by an integrated meta-omics-based approach. Hepatology. 2017;65:451–64.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Iacono A, Raso GM, Canani RB, et al. Probiotics as an emerging therapeutic strategy to treat NAFLD: focus on molecular and biochemical mechanisms. J Nutr Biochem. 2011;22:699–711.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Vajro P, Mandato C, Licenziati MR, et al. Effects of lactobacillus rhamnosus strain GG in pediatric obesity-related liver disease. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr. 2011;52:740–3.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Famouri F, Shariat Z, Hashemipour M, et al. Effects of probiotics on nonalcoholic fatty liver disease in obese children and adolescents. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr. 2017;64:413–7.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Wang CY, Liao JK. A mouse model of diet-induced obesity and insulin resistance. Methods Mol Biol. 2012;821:421–33.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Ritze Y, Bardos G, Claus A, et al. Lactobacillus rhamnosus GG protects against non-alcoholic fatty liver disease in mice. PLoS ONE. 2014;9: e80169.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Calvaruso V, Burroughs AK, Standish R, et al. Computer-assisted image analysis of liver collagen: relationship to Ishak scoring and hepatic venous pressure gradient. Hepatology. 2009;49:1236–44.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Roswall J, Olsson LM, Kovatcheva-Datchary P, et al. Developmental trajectory of the healthy human gut microbiota during the first 5 years of life. Cell Host Microbe. 2021;29(765–76): e3.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Lin YC, Chang PF, Lin HF, et al. Variants in the autophagy-related gene IRGM confer susceptibility to non-alcoholic fatty liver disease by modulating lipophagy. J Hepatol. 2016;65:1209–16.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Mori H, Maruyama F, Kato H, et al. Design and experimental application of a novel non-degenerate universal primer set that amplifies prokaryotic 16S rRNA genes with a low possibility to amplify eukaryotic rRNA genes. DNA Res. 2014;21:217–27.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Kaplan CW, Astaire JC, Sanders ME, et al. 16S ribosomal DNA terminal restriction fragment pattern analysis of bacterial communities in feces of rats fed Lactobacillus acidophilus NCFM. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2001;67:1935–9.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Chen YR, Zhou LZ, Fang ST, et al. Isolation of Desulfovibrio spp. from human gut microbiota using a next-generation sequencing directed culture method. Lett Appl Microbiol. 2019;68:553–61.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Hong Y, Sheng L, Zhong J, et al. Desulfovibrio vulgaris, a potent acetic acid-producing bacterium, attenuates nonalcoholic fatty liver disease in mice. Gut Microbes. 2021;13:1–20.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Loubinoux J, Bronowicki JP, Pereira IA, et al. Sulfate-reducing bacteria in human feces and their association with inflammatory bowel diseases. FEMS Microbiol Ecol. 2002;40:107–12.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Carbonero F, Benefiel AC, Alizadeh-Ghamsari AH, et al. Microbial pathways in colonic sulfur metabolism and links with health and disease. Front Physiol. 2012;3:448.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Zhang C, Zhang M, Pang X, et al. Structural resilience of the gut microbiota in adult mice under high-fat dietary perturbations. ISME J. 2012;6:1848–57.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Oberbach A, Haange SB, Schlichting N, et al. Metabolic in vivo labeling highlights differences of metabolically active microbes from the mucosal gastrointestinal microbiome between high-fat and normal chow diet. J Proteome Res. 2017;16:1593–604.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Yun Y, Kim HN, Kim SE, et al. Comparative analysis of gut microbiota associated with body mass index in a large Korean cohort. BMC Microbiol. 2017;17:151.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Wang J, Tang H, Zhang C, et al. Modulation of gut microbiota during probiotic-mediated attenuation of metabolic syndrome in high fat diet-fed mice. ISME J. 2015;9:1–15.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Sawin EA, De Wolfe TJ, Aktas B, et al. Glycomacropeptide is a prebiotic that reduces Desulfovibrio bacteria, increases cecal short-chain fatty acids, and is anti-inflammatory in mice. Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol. 2015;309:G590-601.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. De Munck TJI, Xu P, Verwijs HJA, et al. Intestinal permeability in human nonalcoholic fatty liver disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Liver Int. 2020;40:2906–16.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Miquilena-Colina ME, Lima-Cabello E, Sanchez-Campos S, et al. Hepatic fatty acid translocase CD36 upregulation is associated with insulin resistance, hyperinsulinaemia and increased steatosis in non-alcoholic steatohepatitis and chronic hepatitis C. Gut. 2011;60:1394–402.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Pardina E, Ferrer R, Rossell J, et al. Hepatic CD36 downregulation parallels steatosis improvement in morbidly obese undergoing bariatric surgery. Int J Obes (Lond). 2017;41:1388–93.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Koonen DP, Jacobs RL, Febbraio M, et al. Increased hepatic CD36 expression contributes to dyslipidemia associated with diet-induced obesity. Diabetes. 2007;56:2863–71.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Garbacz WG, Lu P, Miller TM, et al. Hepatic overexpression of CD36 improves glycogen homeostasis and attenuates high-fat diet-induced hepatic steatosis and insulin resistance. Mol Cell Biol. 2016;36:2715–27.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Wilson CG, Tran JL, Erion DM, et al. Hepatocyte-specific disruption of CD36 attenuates fatty liver and improves insulin sensitivity in HFD-fed mice. Endocrinology. 2016;157:570–85.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Petersen C, Bell R, Klag KA, et al. T cell-mediated regulation of the microbiota protects against obesity. Science. 2019;365:eaat9351.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. Wang R, Tao B, Fan Q, et al. Fatty-acid receptor CD36 functions as a hydrogen sulfide-targeted receptor with its Cys333-Cys272 disulfide bond serving as a specific molecular switch to accelerate gastric cancer metastasis. EBioMedicine. 2019;45:108–23.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. Pichette J, Fynn-Sackey N, Gagnon J. Hydrogen sulfide and sulfate prebiotic stimulates the secretion of GLP-1 and improves glycemia in male mice. Endocrinology. 2017;158:3416–25.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  38. Kushkevych I, Dordevic D, Vitezova M. Toxicity of hydrogen sulfide toward sulfate-reducing bacteria Desulfovibrio piger Vib-7. Arch Microbiol. 2019;201:389–97.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  39. Zhang Y, Zhao M, Jiang X, et al. Comprehensive analysis of fecal microbiome and metabolomics in hepatic fibrosis rats reveal hepatoprotective effects of yinchen wuling powder from the host-microbial metabolic axis. Front Pharmacol. 2021;12: 713197.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  40. Tsuchida T, Friedman SL. Mechanisms of hepatic stellate cell activation. Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2017;14:397–411.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We appreciated Dr. Yu-Lun Kuo at BIOTOOLS Co., Ltd in Taiwan for supporting the analysis of 16S rRNA sequencing data, Dr. Yung-Ming Jeng at the Department of Pathology, National Taiwan University Hospital for interpreting the NAS of mouse liver tissues, and all support and equipment from the Core Laboratory and Animal Laboratory of Far Eastern Memorial Hospital, Taiwan. This work was supported by the Ministry of Science and Technology, Executive Yuan, Taiwan under Grant [MOST 107-2314-B-418-012-MY2, MOST 109-2314-B-418-009-MY3]; Far Eastern Memorial Hospital, Taiwan under Grant [FEMH 107-2314-B-418-012-MY2, FEMH 109-2314-B-418-009 -MY3, FEMH-2021-C-012]; and Far Eastern Memorial Hospital—National Taiwan University Hospital Joint Research Program under Grant [107-FTN02, 108-FTN11, 109-FTN07].

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

The authors’ responsibilities were as follows — Y-CL and Y-HN designed research; Y-CL, H-FL and C-LC conducted research; Y-CL and C-CW analyzed data; Y-CL wrote the paper; Y-HN had primary responsibility for the final content of the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Yen-Hsuan Ni.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

There are no conflicts of interest for any author involved in this study.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary file1 (PDF 2307 KB)

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Lin, YC., Lin, HF., Wu, CC. et al. Pathogenic effects of Desulfovibrio in the gut on fatty liver in diet-induced obese mice and children with obesity. J Gastroenterol 57, 913–925 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00535-022-01909-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00535-022-01909-0

Keywords

Navigation