Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Response criteria of tolvaptan for the treatment of hepatic edema

  • Original Article—Liver, Pancreas, and Biliary Tract
  • Published:
Journal of Gastroenterology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Although tolvaptan is an effective treatment for hepatic edema, there are no established criteria for assessment of the therapeutic effect. The present study evaluates the association between body weight change and clinical symptoms to identify an effective indicator of tolvaptan response.

Methods

The study comprised 460 patients. The first data set contained 147 patients with hepatic edema who received tolvaptan in Kagoshima Kouseiren Hospital, a representative institution of this study. From these data, an optimal cutoff value of body weight change, which accurately indicated symptom reduction, was identified. The response rates obtained based on the cutoff value were evaluated by receiver-operating characteristic (ROC) analysis and kappa coefficients. The kappa coefficient was then validated internally using the bootstrap method and externally using the validation data set of 313 patients from four other hospitals.

Results

A cutoff value for body weight loss of 1.5 kg/week produced the largest area under the ROC curve (0.961; sensitivity, 89.8%; specificity, 92.0%) and a high kappa coefficient (0.831). The correlation between symptom reduction and body weight loss of 1.5 kg/week was evaluated internally and externally, and the cutoff value was validated.

Conclusions

The cutoff value of body weight change that most accurately reflected symptom reduction was 1.5 kg/week; this value is expected to be an effective indicator of response to tolvaptan in clinical practice.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

ROC:

Receiver-operating characteristic

AQP2:

Aquaporin 2

AUC:

Area under the ROC curve

ASI-7:

Ascites Symptom Inventory-7

CLDQ:

Chronic Liver Disease Questionnaire

References

  1. Matsuzaki M, Hori M, Izumi T, Tolvaptan Investigators, et al. Efficacy and safety of tolvaptan in heart failure patients with volume overload despite the standard treatment with conventional diuretics: a phase III, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study (QUEST study). Cardiovasc Drugs Ther. 2011;25:33–45.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Okita K, Sakaida I, Okada M, et al. A multicenter, open-label, dose-ranging study to exploratively evaluate the efficacy, safety, and dose-response of tolvaptan in patients with decompensated liver cirrhosis. J Gastroenterol. 2010;45:979–87.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Jujo K, Saito K, Ishida I, et al. Randomized pilot trial comparing tolvaptan with furosemide on renal and neurohumoral effects in acute heart failure. ESC Heart Fail. 2016;3:177–88.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. Matsue Y, Suzuki M, Torii S, et al. Prognostic impact of early treatment with tolvaptan in patients with acute heart failure and renal dysfunction. Int J Cardiol. 2016;221:188–93.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Hanatani A, Shibata A, Kitada R, et al. Administration of tolvaptan with reduction of loop diuretics ameliorates congestion with improving renal dysfunction in patients with congestive heart failure and renal dysfunction. Heart Vessels. 2016;32:287–94 (Epub ahead of print).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Sakaida I, Kawazoe S, Kajimura K, et al. Tolvaptan for improvement of hepatic edema: a phase 3, multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Hepatol Res. 2014;44:73–82.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Sakaida I, Yamashita S, Kobayashi T, et al. Efficacy and safety of a14-day administration of tolvaptan in the treatment of patients with ascites in hepatic oedema. J Int Med Res. 2013;41:835–47.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Hiramine Y, Uto H. Imamura Y, al. Efficacy of vasopressin V2 receptor antagonist tolvaptan in treatment of hepatic edema. Hepatol Res. 2016;. doi:10.1111/hepr.12778 (Epub ahead of print).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Uojima H, Kinbara T, Hidaka H, et al. Close correlation between urinary sodium excretion and response to tolvaptan in liver cirrhosis patients with ascites. Hepatol Res. 2016;. doi:10.1111/hepr.12716 (Epub ahead of print).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Sakaida I, Terai S, Nakajima K, et al. Predictive factors of the pharmacological action of tolvaptan in patients with liver cirrhosis: a post hoc analysis. J Gastroenterol. 2017;52:229–36.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Imamura T, Kinugawa K, Fujino T, et al. Increased urine aquaporin-2 relative to plasma arginine vasopressin is a novel marker of response to tolvaptan in patients with decompensated heart failure. Circ J. 2014;78:2240–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Sakaida I, Nakajima K, Okita K, et al. Can serum albumin level affect the pharmacological action of tolvaptan in patients with liver cirrhosis? A post hoc analysis of previous clinical trials in Japan. J Gastroenterol. 2015;50:1047–53.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. Yan L, Xie F, Lu J, et al. The treatment of vasopressin V2-receptor antagonists in cirrhosis patients with ascites: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. BMC Gastroenterol. 2015;15:65.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. Santos J, Planas R, Pardo A, et al. Spironolactone alone or in combination with furosemide in the treatment of moderate ascites in nonazotemic cirrhosis. A randomized comparative study of efficacy and safety. J Hepatol. 2003;39:187–92.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Moore KP, Aithal GP. Guidelines on the management of ascites in cirrhosis. Gut. 2006;55:1–12.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. European Association for the Study of the Liver. EASL clinical practice guidelines on the management of ascites, spontaneous bacterial peritonitis, and hepatorenal syndrome in cirrhosis. J Hepatol. 2010;53:397–417.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Angeli P, Fasolato S, Mazza E, et al. Combined versus sequential diuretic treatment of ascites in non-azotaemic patients with cirrhosis: results of an open randomised clinical trial. Gut. 2010;59:98–104.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Wong F, Watson H, Gerbes A, Satavaptan Investigators Group, et al. Satavaptan for the management of ascites in cirrhosis: efficacy and safety across the spectrum of ascites severity. Gut. 2012;61:108–16.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Izumi Y, Miura K, Iwao H. Therapeutic potential of vasopressin-receptor antagonists in heart failure. J Pharmacol Sci. 2014;124:1–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Imamura T, Kinugawa K, Shiga T, et al. Novel criteria of urine osmolality effectively predict response to tolvaptan in decompensated heart failure patients-association between non-responders and chronic kidney disease. Circ J. 2013;77:397–404.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Iwamoto T, Maeda M, Hisanaga T, et al. Predictors of the effect of tolvaptan on the prognosis of cirrhosis. Intern Med. 2016;55:2911–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  22. Kawaratani H, Fukui H, Moriya K, et al. Predictive parameter of tolvaptan effectiveness in cirrhotic ascites. Hepatol Res. 2016;. doi:10.1111/hepr.12826 (Epub ahead of print).

    Google Scholar 

  23. Nakanishi H, Kurosaki M, Hosokawa T, et al. Urinary excretion of the water channel aquaporin 2 correlated with the pharmacological effect of tolvaptan in cirrhotic patients with ascites. J Gastroenterol. 2016;51:620–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Zhang X, Wang SZ, Zheng JF, et al. Clinical efficacy of tolvaptan for treatment of refractory ascites in liver cirrhosis patients. World J Gastroenterol. 2014;20:11400–5.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  25. Imamura T, Kinugawa K, Ohtani T, et al. Assessment of quality of life during long-term treatment of tolvaptan in refractory heart failure: design and rationale of the AQUA-TLV study. Int Heart J. 2014;55:264–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Torres VE, Chapman AB, Devuyst O, et al. Tolvaptan in patients with autosomal dominant polycystic kidney disease. N Engl J Med. 2012;367:2407–18.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  27. O’Brien A, China L, Gant V. The potential danger of empiric antimicrobial therapy for nosocomial SBP. Hepatology. 2016;64:2267–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Oken MM, Creech RH, Tormey DC, et al. Toxicity and response criteria of the Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group. Am J Clin Oncol. 1982;5:649–55.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. National Cancer Institute. Common terminology criteria for adverse events. Bethesda: National Institutes of Health; 2009.

    Google Scholar 

  30. Fukuhara S, Ware JE Jr, Kosinski M, et al. Psychometric and clinical tests of validity of the Japanese SF-36 health survey. J Clin Epidemiol. 1998;51:1045–53.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Dimenäs E, Glise H, Hallerbäck B, et al. Quality of life in patients with upper gastrointestinal symptoms. An improved evaluation of treatment regimens? Scand J Gastroenterol. 1993;28:681–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Morita T, Fujimoto K, Namba M, et al. Palliative care needs of cancer outpatients receiving chemotherapy: an audit of a clinical screening project. Support Care Cancer. 2008;16:101–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Fukazawa R, Koyama S, Kanetaka H, et al. Leg edema detected on comprehensive geriatric assessment for elderly outpatients and its associated risk factors. Nihon Ronen Igakkai Zasshi. 2013;50:384–91.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. National Collaborating Centre for Chronic Conditions. Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. National clinical guideline on management of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease in adults in primary and secondary care. Thorax. 2004;59:1–232.

    Google Scholar 

  35. Kundel HL, Polansky M. Measurement of observer agreement. Radiology. 2003;228:303–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Hesterberg TC. What teachers should know about the bootstrap: resampling in the undergraduate statistics curriculum. Am Stat. 2015;69:371–86.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  37. Sakaida I, Terai S, Kurosaki M, et al. Effectiveness and safety of tolvaptan in liver cirrhosis patients with edema: interim results of post-marketing surveillance of tolvaptan in liver cirrhosis (START study). Hepatol Res. 2016;. doi:10.1111/hepr.12852 (Epub ahead of print).

    Google Scholar 

  38. Sakaida I, Okita K. Correlation between changes in bodyweight and changes in ascites volume in liver cirrhosis patients with hepatic edema in short-term diuretic therapy. Hepatol Res. 2014;44:735–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Arroyo V, Ginès P, Gerbes AL, et al. Definition and diagnostic criteria of refractory ascites and hepatorenal syndrome in cirrhosis. International Ascites Club. Hepatology. 1996;23:164–76.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Higginson IJ, McCarthy M. Validity of the support team assessment schedule: do staffs’ ratings reflect those made by patients or their families? Palliat Med. 1993;7:219–28.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Onishi Y, Wakita T, Fukuhara S, et al. Development and validation of a symptom scale specific for ascites accompanied with cirrhosis: the ASI-7. Clin Transl Gastroenterol. 2014;5:e48.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  42. Younossi ZM, Guyatt G, Kiwi M, et al. Development of a disease specific questionnaire to measure health related quality of life in patients with chronic liver disease. Gut. 1999;45:295–300.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  43. Nakamura T, Sata M, Hiroishi K, et al. Contribution of diuretic therapy with human serum albumin to the management of ascites in patients with advanced liver cirrhosis: a prospective cohort study. Mol Clin Oncol. 2014;2:349–55.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  44. Felker GM, Mentz RJ, Cole R, et al. Efficacy and safety of tolvaptan in patients hospitalized with acute heart failure. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2016;. doi:10.1016/j.jacc.2016.09.004 (Epub ahead of print).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

YH, HU, HN, AH, TI, MK, ST, HY, KO, and KK conceived of the study and participated in its design and coordination. YH, HU, HN, AH, MK, HK, and TI conducted the data analysis. YH interpreted the findings and drafted the original manuscript. HU, HY, ST, KO, and KK edited the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Yasunari Hiramine.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

HN, ST, IS, NI, KO and KK have received honoraria from Otsuka Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd. The other authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Hiramine, Y., Uojima, H., Nakanishi, H. et al. Response criteria of tolvaptan for the treatment of hepatic edema. J Gastroenterol 53, 258–268 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00535-017-1366-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00535-017-1366-6

Keywords

Navigation