Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Clinicopathological features of superficial non-ampurally duodenal epithelial tumor; gastric phenotype of histology correlates to higher malignant potency

  • Original Article—Alimentary Tract
  • Published:
Journal of Gastroenterology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Superficial non-ampullary duodenal epithelial tumors (SNADETs) are relatively rare, but they are now being detected more frequently due to advances in endoscopic technology. Nevertheless, the pathological nature of SNADETs remains unclear and a management strategy for these tumors has not been established.

Methods

To elucidate the clinicopathological features, we conducted a retrospective analysis of 138 endoscopically resected SNADETs. Lesions were classified into two groups by histological grade according to the Vienna classification: category 3 (71 lesions, 51.4%) and category 4/5 (67 lesions, 48.6%).

Results

Compared with category 3 lesions, category 4/5 lesions were significantly more common in elderly patients (p < 0.001) and had a significantly larger tumor diameter (p = 0.001). Immunohistochemical analysis showed that category 4/5 lesions expressed MUC5AC (p = 0.002), MUC6 (p < 0.001), and p53 (p = 0.003) significantly more frequently and expressed CD10 (p = 0.002) and CDX2 (p = 0.029) significantly less frequently. Multivariate regression analysis showed that advanced age (p < 0.001), MUC6 expression (p = 0.001), and p53 expression (p = 0.004) were independent risk factors for a classification of category 4/5. In addition, advanced age (p = 0.010) and MUC5AC expression (p = 0.011) were identified as risk factors for lesions classified as category 4.2 (noninvasive carcinoma) or higher. All category 5 lesions expressed MUC5AC.

Conclusions

The gastric phenotype of MUC5AC and MUC6 may be linked to the malignant potential of SNADETs.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Endo M, Abiko Y, Oana S, et al. Usefulness of endoscopic treatment for duodenal adenoma. Dig Endosc. 2010;22:360–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Alwmark A, Andersson A, Lasson A. Primary carcinoma of the duodenum. Ann Surg. 1980;191:13–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. Jepsen JM, Persson M, Jakobsen NO, et al. Prospective study of prevalence and endoscopic and histopathologic characteristics of duodenal polyps in patients submitted to upper endoscopy. Scand J Gastroenterol. 1994;29:483–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Schottenfeld D, Beebe-Dimmer JL, Vigneau FD. The epidemiology and pathogenesis of neoplasia in the small intestine. Ann Epidemiol. 2009;19:58–69.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. Goda K, Kikuchi D, Yamamoto Y, et al. Endoscopic diagnosis of superficial non-ampullary duodenal epithelial tumors in Japan: multicenter case series. Dig Endosc. 2014;26(Suppl 2):23–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Howe JR, Karnell LH, Menck HR, et al. The American College of Surgeons Commission on Cancer and the American Cancer Society. Adenocarcinoma of the small bowel: review of the National Cancer Data Base, 1985–1995. Cancer. 1999;86:2693–706.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Kikuchi D, Hoteya S, Iizuka T, et al. Diagnostic algorithm of magnifying endoscopy with narrow band imaging for superficial non-ampullary duodenal epithelial tumors. Dig Endosc. 2014;26(Suppl 2):16–22.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Hoteya S, Yahagi N, Iizuka T, et al. Endoscopic submucosal dissection for nonampullary large superficial adenocarcinoma/adenoma of the duodenum: feasibility and long-term outcomes. Endosc Int Open. 2013;1:2–7.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. Tsuji S, Doyama H, Tsuji K, et al. Preoperative endoscopic diagnosis of superficial non-ampullary duodenal epithelial tumors, including magnifying endoscopy. World J Gastroenterol. 2015;21:11832–41.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. Hoteya S, Kaise M, Iizuka T, et al. Delayed bleeding after endoscopic submucosal dissection for non-ampullary superficial duodenal neoplasias might be prevented by prophylactic endoscopic closure: analysis of risk factors. Dig Endosc. 2015;27:323–30.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Hoteya S, Furuhata T, Takahito T, et al. Endoscopic submucosal dissection and endoscopic mucosal resection for non-ampullary superficial duodenal tumor. Digestion. 2017;95:36–42.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Inoue T, Uedo N, Yamashina T, et al. Delayed perforation: a hazardous complication of endoscopic resection for non-ampullary duodenal neoplasm. Dig Endosc. 2014;26:220–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Kakushima N, Kanemoto H, Tanaka M, et al. Treatment for superficial non-ampullary duodenal epithelial tumors. World J Gastroenterol. 2014;20:12501–8.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. Oka S, Tanaka S, Nagata S, et al. Clinicopathologic features and endoscopic resection of early primary nonampullary duodenal carcinoma. J Clin Gastroenterol. 2003;37:381–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Dixon MF. Gastrointestinal epithelial neoplasia: Vienna revisited. Gut. 2002;51:130–1.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. Liu XP, Kawauchi S, Oga A, et al. Combined examination of p27(Kip1), p21(Waf1/Cip1) and p53 expression allows precise estimation of prognosis in patients with gastric carcinoma. Histopathology. 2001;39:603–10.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Boonla C, Wongkham S, Sheehan JK, et al. Prognostic value of serum MUC5AC mucin in patients with cholangiocarcinoma. Cancer. 2003;98:1438–43.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Kocer B, Soran A, Erdogan S, et al. Expression of MUC5AC in colorectal carcinoma and relationship with prognosis. Pathol Int. 2002;52:470–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Shibahara H, Higashi M, Koriyama C, et al. Pathobiological implications of mucin (MUC) expression in the outcome of small bowel cancer. PLoS One. 2014;9:e86111.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  20. Imai Y, Yamagishi H, Fukuda K, et al. Differential mucin phenotypes and their significance in a variation of colorectal carcinoma. World J Gastroenterol. 2013;19:3957–68.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  21. Kolodziejczyk P, Yao T, Oya M, et al. Long-term follow-up study of patients with gastric adenomas with malignant transformation. An immunohistochemical and histochemical analysis. Cancer. 1994;74:2896–907.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Hida R, Yamamoto H, Hirahashi M, et al. Duodenal neoplasms of gastric phenotype: an immunohistochemical and genetic study with a practical approach to the classification. Am J Surg Pathol. 2017;41:343–53.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Amaya S, Sasaki M, Watanabe Y, et al. Expression of MUC1 and MUC2 and carbohydrate antigen Tn change during malignant transformation of biliary papillomatosis. Histopathology. 2001;38:550–60.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Baker SJ, Fearon ER, Nigro JM, et al. Chromosome 17 deletions and p53 gene mutations in colorectal carcinomas. Science. 1989;244:217–21.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Rodrigues NR, Rowan A, Smith ME, et al. p53 mutations in colorectal cancer. Proc Natl Acad Sci. 1990;87:7555–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank the medical technologists of the Department of Pathology for technical assistance in this study. This study was supported by funding from Toranomon Hospital Tokyo, Japan.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Takahito Toba.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Toba, T., Inoshita, N., Kaise, M. et al. Clinicopathological features of superficial non-ampurally duodenal epithelial tumor; gastric phenotype of histology correlates to higher malignant potency. J Gastroenterol 53, 64–70 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00535-017-1327-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00535-017-1327-0

Keywords

Navigation