Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Daily granulocyte and monocyte adsorptive apheresis in patients with active ulcerative colitis: a prospective safety and feasibility study

  • Original Article—Alimentary Tract
  • Published:
Journal of Gastroenterology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

This prospective study was to assess the safety and feasibility of daily granulocyte and monocyte adsorptive apheresis (GMA) therapy in patients with active ulcerative colitis (UC).

Methods

Thirty consecutive patients with moderately or severely active UC received daily GMA treatment (5 sessions over 5 consecutive days) with the Adacolumn. Adverse events (AE), patient tolerability, and clinical symptoms were monitored daily.

Results

Sixteen patients (53%) experienced AE during at least one GMA session. The most frequent AE was mild headache followed by fatigue and fever. None of the AE was serious, and all patients completed the 5 consecutive GMA sessions. Clinical symptoms (stool frequency and/or rectal bleeding) were improved in 21 patients (70%) during the course of GMA therapy. Clinical remission defined as normal stool frequency and no rectal bleeding was achieved in 7 patients (23%) after 5 GMA sessions. Seven of 20 patients (35%) with moderately active disease achieved clinical remission, whereas none of the 10 patients with severely active disease achieved clinical remission. Total and differential leukocyte counts, platelet count, and hemoglobin level did not significantly change, but C-reactive protein level significantly decreased during the course of GMA therapy.

Conclusions

This is the first report on daily GMA in the treatment of patients with UC. Daily GMA was safe and well tolerated without serious AE. Furthermore, daily GMA was associated with rapid improvement of clinical symptoms in patients with moderately active UC. However, controlled trials are warranted to assess a definite efficacy for daily GMA therapy.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Shimoyama T, Sawada K, Hiwatashi N, Sawada T, Matsueda K, Munakata A, et al. Safety and efficacy of granulocyte and monocyte adsorption apheresis in patients with active ulcerative colitis: a multicenter study. J Clin Apher. 2001;16:1–9.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Saniabadi AR, Hanai H, Takeuchi K, Umemura K, Nakashima M, Adachi T, et al. Adacolumn, an adsorptive carrier based granulocyte and monocyte apheresis device for the treatment of inflammatory and refractory diseases associated with leukocytes. Therap Apher Dial. 2003;7:48–59.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Hanai H, Watanabe F, Takeuchi K, Iida T, Yamada M, Iwaoka Y, et al. Leukocyte adsorptive apheresis for the treatment of active ulcerative colitis: a prospective, uncontrolled, pilot study. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2003;1:28–35.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Suzuki Y, Yoshimura N, Saniabadi AR, Saito Y. Selective granulocyte and monocyte adsorptive apheresis as a first-line treatment for steroid naïve patients with active ulcerative colitis: a prospective uncontrolled study. Dig Dis Sci. 2004;49:565–71.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Naganuma M, Funakoshi S, Sakuraba A, Takagi H, Inoue N, Ogata H, et al. Granulocytapheresis is useful as an alternative therapy in patients with steroid-refractory or -dependent ulcerative colitis. Inflamm Bowel Dis. 2004;10:251–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Hanai H, Watanabe F, Yamada M, Sato Y, Takeuchi K, Iida T, et al. Adsorptive granulocyte and monocyte apheresis versus prednisolone in patients with corticosteroid-dependent moderately severe ulcerative colitis. Digestion. 2004;70:36–44.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Yamamoto T, Umegae S, Kitagawa T, Yasuda Y, Yamada Y, Takahashi D, et al. Granulocyte and monocyte adsorptive apheresis in the treatment of active distal ulcerative colitis: a prospective, pilot study. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2004;20:783–92.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Yamamoto T, Saniabadi AR, Maruyama Y, Umegae S, Matsumoto K. Factors affecting clinical and endoscopic efficacies of selective leucocytapheresis for ulcerative colitis. Dig Liver Dis. 2007;39:626–33.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Habermalz B, Sauerland S. Clinical effectiveness of selective granulocyte, monocyte adsorptive apheresis with the Adacolumn device in ulcerative colitis. Dig Dis Sci. 2010;55:1421–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Sakuraba A, Motoya S, Watanabe K, Nishishita M, Kanke K, Matsui T, et al. An open-label prospective randomized multicenter study shows very rapid remission of ulcerative colitis by intensive granulocyte and monocyte adsorptive apheresis as compared with routine weekly treatment. Am J Gastroenterol. 2009;104:2990–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Sakuraba A, Sato T, Naganuma M, Morohoshi Y, Matsuoka K, Inoue N, et al. A pilot open-labeled prospective randomized study between weekly and intensive treatment of granulocyte and monocyte adsorption apheresis for active ulcerative colitis. J Gastroenterol. 2008;43:51–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Sutherland LR, Martin F, Greer S, Robinson M, Greenberger N, Saibil F, et al. 5-Aminosalicylic acid enema in the treatment of distal ulcerative colitis, proctosigmoiditis, and proctitis. Gastroenterology. 1987;92:1984–8.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Yamamoto T, Umegae S, Matsumoto K. Mucosal healing in patients with ulcerative colitis during a course of selective leukocytapheresis therapy: a prospective cohort study. Inflamm Bowel Dis. 2010;16:1905–11.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Norda R, Berséus O, Stegmayr B. Adverse events and problems in therapeutic hemapheresis. A report from the Swedish registry. Transfus Apher Sci. 2001;25:33–41.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Kanai T, Hibi T, Watanabe M. The logics of leukocytapheresis as a natural biological therapy for inflammatory bowel disease. Expert Opin Biol Ther. 2006;6:453–66.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Sakata Y, Iwakiri R, Amemori S, Yamaguchi K, Fujise T, Otani H, et al. Comparison of the efficacy of granulocyte and monocyte/macrophage adsorptive apheresis and leucocytapheresis in active ulcerative colitis patients: a prospective randomized study. Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2008;20:629–33.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Tsujikawa T, Andoh A, Ogaẃa A, Sonoda A, Yagi Y, Hata K, et al. Feasibility of five days of consecutive leukocytapheresis for the treatment of ulcerative colitis: a preliminary study. Ther Apher Dial. 2009;13:14–8.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Saniabadi AR, Hanai H, Fukunaga K, Sawada K, Shima C, Bjarnason I, et al. Therapeutic leukocytapheresis for inflammatory bowel disease. Transfus Apher Sci. 2007;37:191–200.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Takayuki Yamamoto.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Yamamoto, T., Umegae, S. & Matsumoto, K. Daily granulocyte and monocyte adsorptive apheresis in patients with active ulcerative colitis: a prospective safety and feasibility study. J Gastroenterol 46, 1003–1009 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00535-011-0428-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00535-011-0428-4

Keywords

Navigation