Abstract
Background
The anatomical reference points used to endoscopically diagnose Barrett’s esophagus (BE) differ between Japan and other countries. The esophageal gastric junction (EGJ) is defined as the distal limit of the lower esophageal longitudinal or palisade vessels in Japan, but as the proximal margin of the gastric folds (Prague C&M criteria). The aim of this study was to prospectively compare endoscopic BE diagnoses using the Japanese and Prague C&M criteria.
Methods
Two endoscopists examined 110 consecutive patients [73 male, 37 female; age, 66.5 ± 8.7 (mean ± standard deviation) years]. Post-gastrectomy, post-esophagectomy, and post-chemoradiotherapy esophageal cancer patients were excluded as subjects.
Results
EGJ identification rates were 95% (104/110) and 86% (95/110) using the Japanese and Prague C&M criteria, respectively (p = 0.039). Among the 110 patients, 43 (39%) and 29 (26%) were diagnosed as having endoscopic BE using the respective criteria (p = 0.044). In atrophic gastritis and reflux esophagitis cases, there was no significant difference in EGJ identification rates between the Japanese and Prague C&M criteria. However, the ratio of endoscopic BE diagnosis using the Japanese criteria was significantly higher than that using the Prague C&M criteria in atrophic gastritis cases (p = 0.03).
Conclusions
There was a significant difference in endoscopic BE diagnostic results between the Japanese and Prague C&M criteria. In the Japanese population, the Japanese criteria may be more suitable for the definition of EGJ and for the diagnosis of endoscopic BE than the Prague C&M criteria.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Pera M, Manterola C, Vidal O, Grande L. Epidemiology of esophageal adenocarcinoma. J Surg Oncol. 2005;92:151–9.
Blot WJ, Devesa SS, Kneller RW, Fraumeni JF. Rising incidence of adenocarcinoma of the esophagus and gastric cardia. JAMA. 1991;265:1287–9.
Devesa SS, Blot WJ, Fraumeni JF Jr. Changing patterns in the incidence of esophageal and gastric carcinoma in the United States. Cancer. 1998;83:2049–53.
Pohl H, Welch HG. The role of overdiagnosis and reclassification in the marked increase of esophageal adenocarcinoma incidence. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2005;97:142–6.
Spechler SJ, Goyal RK. The columnar-lined esophagus, intestinal metaplasia, and Norman Barrett. Gastroenterology. 1996;110:614–21.
Hongo M, Shoji T. Epidemiology of reflux disease and CLE in East Asia. J Gastroenterol. 2003;38:25–30.
Kawano T, Kouzu T, Ohara S, Kusano M. The prevalence of Barrett’s mucosa in the Japanese. Gastroenterol Endosc. 2005;47:951–61 (in Japanese with English abstract).
Aoki T. Report on Research Committee of Definition on Barrett’s Esophagus (Epithelium). In: Sugimachi K, editor. Reports on Research Committees Japanese Society for Esophageal Diseases. Chiba: Japanese Society of Esophageal Diseases; 2000. p. 20–3 (in Japanese).
Sharma P, Dent J, Armstrong D, Bergman JJGHM, Gossner L, Hoshihara Y, et al. The development and validation of an endoscopic grading system for Barrett’s esophagus: the Prague C&M criteria. Gastroenterology. 2006;131:1392–9.
Amano Y, Ishimura N, Furuta K, Takahashi Y, Chinuki D, Mishima Y, et al. Which landmark results in a more consistent diagnosis of Barrett’s esophagus, the gastric folds or the palisade vessels? Gastrointest Endosc. 2006;64:206–11.
Kimura K, Takemoto T. An endoscopic recognition of the atrophic border and its significance in chronic gastritis. Endoscopy. 1969;3:87–97.
Lundell LR, Dent J, Bennett JR, Blum AL, Armstrong D, Galmiche JP, et al. Endoscopic assessment of oesophagitis: clinical and functional correlates and further validation of the Los Angeles classification. Gut. 1999;45:172–80.
Barrett NR. Chronic peptic ulcer of the oesophagus and “oesophagitis”. Br J Surg. 1950;38:175–82.
Hamilton SR, Smith RRL. The relationship between columnar epithelial dysplasia and invasive adenocarcinoma arising in Barrett’s esophagus. Am J Clin Pathol. 1987;87:301–12.
McClave SA, Boyce HW Jr, Gottfried MR. Early diagnosis of columnar-lined esophagus: a new endoscopic criterion. Gastrointest Endosc. 1987;33:413–6.
Spechler SJ. Barrett’s esophagus and cancer of the gastroesophageal junction. Esophagus. 2005;2:169–73.
Hoshihara Y. The definite endoscopic criteria for the diagnosis of Barrett’s esophagus. Gastroenterol Endosc. 2007;19:1451–6 (in Japanese with English abstract).
Kouzu T, Inoue M, Hishikawa E. Problems of the esophagogastric junction from the viewpoint of endoscopist. Gastroenterol Endosc. 2007;19:1411–8 (in Japanese with English abstract).
Hoshihara Y, Kogre T, Fukuchi S, Akiyama H, Miyamoto T. Endoscopic observation of longitudinal vessels at the lower esophagus and its clinical significance. Gastroenterol Endosc. 1986;28:941–6 (in Japanese with English abstract).
De Carvalho CAF. Sur l’angio-architecture veineuse de la zone de transition oesophagogastrique et son interpretation fonctionnelle. Acta Anat. 1966;64:125–62 (in French with English and German abstracts).
Naylor GM, Gotoda T, Dixon M, Shimoda T, Gatta L, Owen R, et al. Why does Japan have a high incidence of gastric cancer? Comparison of gastritis between UK and Japanese patients. Gut. 2006;55:1545–52.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors have no competing interests.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Kinjo, T., Kusano, C., Oda, I. et al. Prague C&M and Japanese criteria: shades of Barrett’s esophagus endoscopic diagnosis. J Gastroenterol 45, 1039–1044 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00535-010-0264-y
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00535-010-0264-y