Abstract
Background
Nutcracker esophagus (NE) is a well-described esophageal motility disorder often implicated as the cause of chest pain (CP). The aim of this study was to analyze the role of peristaltic amplitude, lower esophageal sphincter (LES) pressure, and 24 h pH scores in patient symptomatology.
Methods
After obtaining Institutional Review Board approval, a retrospective review of manometric data from 1984 to 2008 at the esophageal center was done to identify patients meeting NE criteria (mean distal esophageal body amplitude of >180 mmHg). The data for patient’s symptoms, manometric findings including the amplitude of the distal two esophageal body peristalses, LES pressure, and 24 h pH score were extracted and analyzed.
Results
Out of 4,923 patients, 313 (6.4%) patients met the manometric criteria for NE, and of these, 298 patients had complete manometry data along with at least 1 reported symptom. CP was associated with LES competence, with a significantly higher percentage of patients with high LES pressure complaining of CP (p < 0.05). There was no relationship of with the mean amplitude of esophageal body pressure (p > 0.05) or with distal esophageal acid exposure (p > 0.05).
Conclusions
CP is a commonly reported symptom in patients with manometry findings of NE. However, CP is related to LES competence rather than the amplitude of the esophageal body waves or 24 h pH monitoring scores.
Similar content being viewed by others
Abbreviations
- B1:
-
Esophageal body pressure 8 cm above LES
- B2:
-
Esophageal body pressure 3 cm above LES
- CP:
-
Chest pain
- HTN-LES:
-
Hypertensive LES
- Incomp-LES:
-
Incompetent LES
- LES:
-
Lower esophageal sphincter
- NE:
-
Nutcracker esophagus
- N-LES:
-
Normal LES
- RIP:
-
Respiratory inversion point
References
Brand DL, Martin D, Pope CE. Esophageal manometrics in patients with angina-like chest pain. Am J Dig Dis. 1977;22:300–4.
Benjamin SB, Gerhardt DC, Castell DO. High amplitude, peristaltic esophageal contractions associated with chest pain and/or dysphagia. Gastroenterology. 1979;77:478–83.
Tutuian R, Castell DO. Esophageal motility disorders (distal esophageal spasm, nutcracker esophagus, and hypertensive lower esophageal sphincter): modern management. Curr Treat Options Gastroenterol. 2006;9:283–94.
Traube M, Albibi R, McCallum RW. High-amplitude peristaltic esophageal contractions associated with chest pain. JAMA. 1983;250:2655–9.
Katz PO, Dalton CB, Richter JE, Wu WC, Castell DO. Esophageal testing of patients with noncardiac chest pain or dysphagia. Results of three years’ experience with 1161 patients. Ann Intern Med. 1987;106:593–7.
Achem SR, Kolts BE, Wears R, Burton L, Richter JE. Chest pain associated with nutcracker esophagus: a preliminary study of the role of gastroesophageal reflux. Am J Gastroenterol. 1993;88:187–92.
Zaninotto G, DeMeester TR, Schwizer W, Johansson KE, Cheng SC. The lower esophageal sphincter in health and disease. Am J Surg. 1988;155:104–11.
Winans CS. Manometric asymmetry of the lower-esophageal high-pressure zone. Am J Dig Dis. 1977;22:348–54.
Spechler SJ, Castell DO. Classification of oesophageal motility abnormalities. Gut. 2001;49:145–51.
Richter JE, Wu WC, Johns DN, Blackwell JN, Nelson JL III, Castell JA, Castell DO. Esophageal manometry in 95 healthy adult volunteers. Variability of pressures with age and frequency of “abnormal” contractions. Dig Dis Sci. 1987;32:583–92.
Dalton CB, Castell DO, Richter JE. The changing faces of the nutcracker esophagus. Am J Gastroenterol. 1988;83:623–8.
Clouse RE, Staiano A. Manometric patterns using esophageal body and lower sphincter characteristics. Findings in 1013 patients. Dig Dis Sci. 1992;37:289–96.
Richter JE, Bradley LA, Castell DO. Esophageal chest pain: current controversies in pathogenesis, diagnosis, and therapy. Ann Intern Med. 1989;110:66–78.
Cohen S. Esophageal motility disorders and their response to calcium channel antagonists. The sphinx revisited. Gastroenterology. 1987;93:201–3.
Castell DO. The nutcracker and the ostrich. Am J Gastroenterol. 1993;88:1287–8.
Kahrilas PJ. Esophageal motility disorders: current concepts of pathogenesis and treatment. Can J Gastroenterol. 2000;14:221–31.
Kamberoglou DK, Xirouchakis ES, Margetis NG, Delaporta EE, Zambeli EP, Doulgeroglou VG, Tzias VD. Correlation between esophageal contraction amplitude and lower esophageal sphincter pressure in patients with nutcracker esophagus. Dis Esophagus. 2007;20:151–4.
Borjesson M, Pilhall M, Rolny P, Mannheimer C. Gastroesophageal acid reflux in patients with nutcracker esophagus. Scand J Gastroenterol. 2001;36:916–20.
Agrawal A, Hila A, Tutuian R, Mainie I, Castell DO. Clinical relevance of the nutcracker esophagus: suggested revision of criteria for diagnosis. J Clin Gastroenterol. 2006;40:504–9.
Freidin N, Traube M, Mittal RK, McCallum RW. The hypertensive lower esophageal sphincter. Manometric and clinical aspects. Dig Dis Sci. 1989;34:1063–7.
Waterman DC, Dalton CB, Ott DJ, Castell JA, Bradley LA, Castell DO, Richter JE. Hypertensive lower esophageal sphincter: what does it mean? J Clin Gastroenterol. 1989;11:139–46.
Gockel I, Lord RV, Bremner CG, Crookes PF, Hamrah P, DeMeester TR. The hypertensive lower esophageal sphincter: a motility disorder with manometric features of outflow obstruction. J Gastrointest Surg. 2003;7:692–700.
Mujica VR, Mudipalli RS, Rao SS. Pathophysiology of chest pain in patients with nutcracker esophagus. Am J Gastroenterol. 2001;96:1371–7.
Rao SS, Gregersen H, Hayek B, Summers RW, Christensen J. Unexplained chest pain: the hypersensitive, hyperreactive, and poorly compliant esophagus. Ann Intern Med. 1996;124:950–8.
Katzka DA, Sidhu M, Castell DO. Hypertensive lower esophageal sphincter pressures and gastroesophageal reflux: an apparent paradox that is not unusual. Am J Gastroenterol. 1995;90:280–4.
Richter JE. Oesophageal motility disorders. Lancet. 2001;358:823–8.
Conflict of interest statement
No conflicts of interest for any of the authors.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Appendix: Standardized questionnaire
Appendix: Standardized questionnaire
-
Heartburn;
-
0 = No symptom
-
1 = Minimal: identifiable symptoms, occasional episodes. No prior medical visits
-
2 = Moderate: primary reason for visit, medical problem
-
3 = Severe: constant, marked disability in activities of daily living
-
-
Chest pain;
-
0 = None
-
1 = Minimal: occasional episodes
-
2 = Moderate: reason for visit
-
3 = Severe: interfering with daily activities
-
-
Regurgitation;
-
0 = None
-
1 = Mild: after straining and/or large meals
-
2 = Moderate: predictable with position change, straining or lying down
-
3 = Severe: constant regurgitation, presence of aspiration
-
-
Lung symptoms (cough/asthma);
-
0 = None
-
1 = recurrent cough
-
2 = night cough
-
3 = recurrent pneumonia or bronchitis
-
4 = asthma
-
5 = change of voice
-
6 = sinusitis
-
-
Dysphagia;
-
0 = None
-
1 = occasionally with coarse foods (meat, sandwich, hard roll) lasting a few seconds
-
2 = requires clearing with liquids
-
3 = Severe: semi-liquid diet, history of meat impaction
-
4 = For liquids (paradox dysphagia)
-
-
Odynophagia;
-
0 = None
-
1 = yes
-
-
Epigastric pain;
-
0 = None
-
1 = None
-
2 = Mild
-
3 = Moderate
-
4 = Severe
-
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Tsuboi, K., Mittal, S.K., Legner, A. et al. Relationship between manometric findings and reported symptoms in nutcracker esophagus: insights gained from a review of 313 patients. J Gastroenterol 45, 1033–1038 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00535-010-0261-1
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00535-010-0261-1