Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Gemcitabine as first-line chemotherapy in elderly patients with unresectable pancreatic carcinoma

  • Original Article—Liver, Pancreas, and Biliary Tract
  • Published:
Journal of Gastroenterology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Gemcitabine (GEM) is the key drug for the chemotherapy of unresectable pancreatic cancer. However, the efficacy and safety of GEM has not been established in elderly patients. We retrospectively examined the prognosis of elderly pancreatic cancer patients treated with GEM.

Methods

Sixty-six patients with unresectable pancreatic cancer (pathologically identified) and no prior chemotherapy were divided into three groups. Group A: patients aged 70 years or more who received standard GEM (1000 mg/m2) on days 1, 8, and 15 and rest on day 21; Group B: patients less than 70 years old who received standard GEM therapy; and Group C: patients under best supportive care.

Results

Median survival times (MSTs) (days) were 311 in group A (p < 0.05 vs. group C), 292 in group B (p < 0.05 vs. group C), and 127 in group C. Among the patients who received GEM, 23% patients in group A and 16% patients in group B obtained partial responses. The response rates and MSTs were similar in groups A and B, as well as in more aged (≥75 years) patients. Bone marrow suppression was more frequently seen in elderly patients. Cox’s hazard model in patients aged 70 years or more revealed that GEM therapy reduced the hazard ratio for death (hazard ratio: 0.683, p = 0.041).

Conclusions

Chemotherapy with GEM appears to be effective and safe in elderly patients as well as in younger patients. Patients with unresectable pancreatic carcinoma should receive GEM therapy even if they are aged 70 or more, even if they are aged 75 or more.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

GEM:

Gemcitabine

CR:

Complete response

PR:

Partial response

SD:

Stable disease

PD:

Progressive disease

MST:

Median survival time

BSC:

Best supportive care

RDI:

Relative dose intensity

References

  1. Rosewicz S, Wiedenmann B. Pancreatic carcinoma. Lancet. 1997;349:485–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Jemal A, Thomas A, Murray T, Thun M. Cancer statistics, 2002. CA Cancer J Clin. 2002;52:23–47.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Heinemann V. Gemcitabine in the treatment of advanced pancreatic cancer: a comparative analysis of randomized trials. Semin Oncol. 2002;29:9–16.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Burris HA 3rd, Moore MJ, Andersen J, Green MR, Rothenberg ML, Modiano MR, et al. Improvements in survival and clinical benefit with gemcitabine as first-line therapy for patients with advanced pancreas cancer: a randomized trial. J Clin Oncol. 1997;15:2403–13.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Moore MJ, Goldstein D, Hamm J, Figer A, Hecht JR, Gallinger S, et al. Erlotinib plus gemcitabine compared with gemcitabine alone in patients with advanced pancreatic cancer: a phase III trial of the National Cancer Institute of Canada Clinical Trials Group. J Clin Oncol. 2007;25:1960–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Herrmann R, Bodoky G, Ruhstaller T, Glimelius B, Bajetta E, Schuller J, et al. Gemcitabine plus capecitabine compared with gemcitabine alone in advanced pancreatic cancer: a randomized, multicenter, phase III trial of the Swiss Group for Clinical Cancer Research and the Central European Cooperative Oncology Group. J Clin Oncol. 2007;25:2212–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. National Cancer Institute (US) Surveillance program. SEER cancer statistics review: tables and graphs. 1989.

  8. Marugame T, Matsuda T, Kamo K, Katanoda K, Ajiki W, Sobue T. Cancer incidence and incidence rates in Japan in 2001 based on the data from 10 population-based cancer registries. Jpn J Clin Oncol. 2007;37:884–91.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Martin C, Ardizzoni A, Rosso R. Gemcitabine: safety profile and efficacy in non-small cell lung cancer unaffected by age. Aging (Milano). 1997;9:297–303.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Hanada K, Hino F, Amano H, Fukuda T, Kuroda Y. Current treatment strategies for pancreatic cancer in the elderly. Drugs Aging. 2006;23:403–10.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Maréchal R, Demols A, Gay F, de Maertelaer V, Arvanitaki M, Hendlisz A, et al. Tolerance and efficacy of gemcitabine and gemcitabine-based regimens in elderly patients with advanced pancreatic cancer. Pancreas. 2008;36:e16–21.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Morita T, Akechi T, Ikenaga M, Kizawa Y, Kohara H, Mukaiyama T, et al. Communication about the ending of anticancer treatment and transition to palliative care. Ann Oncol. 2004;15:1551–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Shepherd FA, Abratt RP, Anderson H, Gatzemeier U, Anglin G, Iglesias J. Gemcitabine in the treatment of elderly patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer. Semin Oncol. 1997;24:S7-50–5.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Begg CB, Carbone PP. Clinical trials and drug toxicity in the elderly. The experience of the Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group. Cancer. 1983;52:1986–92.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Pavlakis N, Bell DR, Millward MJ, Levi JA. Fatal pulmonary toxicity resulting from treatment with gemcitabine. Cancer. 1997;80:286–91.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Gupta N, Ahmed I, Steinberg H, Patel D, Nissel-Horowitz S, Mehrotra B. Gemcitabine-induced pulmonary toxicity: case report and review of the literature. Am J Clin Oncol. 2002;25:96–100.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Ueno H, Okusaka T, Ikeda M, Takezako Y, Morizane C. An early phase II study of S-1 in patients with metastatic pancreatic cancer. Oncology. 2005;68:171–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Hayashi K, Imaizumi T, Uchida K, Kuramochi H, Takasaki K. High response rates in patients with pancreatic cancer using the novel oral fluoropyrimidine S-1. Oncol Rep. 2002;9:1355–61.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Morizane C, Okusaka T, Furuse J, Ishii H, Ueno H, Ikeda M, et al. A phase II study of S-1 in gemcitabine-refractory metastatic pancreatic cancer. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol. 2009;63(2):313–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Lundin J, Roberts PJ, Kuusela P, Haglund C. The prognostic value of preoperative serum levels of CA 19–9 and CEA in patients with pancreatic cancer. Br J Cancer. 1994;69:515–9.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Katz A, Hanlon A, Lanciano R, Hoffman J, Coia L. Prognostic value of CA 19–9 levels in patients with carcinoma of the pancreas treated with radiotherapy. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 1998;41:393–6.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Halm U, Schumann T, Schiefke I, Witzigmann H, Mossner J, Keim V. Decrease of CA 19–9 during chemotherapy with gemcitabine predicts survival time in patients with advanced pancreatic cancer. Br J Cancer. 2000;82:1013–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Ziske C, Schlie C, Gorschluter M, Glasmacher A, Mey U, Strehl J, et al. Prognostic value of CA 19–9 levels in patients with inoperable adenocarcinoma of the pancreas treated with gemcitabine. Br J Cancer. 2003;89:1413–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This study was supported by grants from the Japanese Ministry of Education, Science, and Culture, and by a Keio University Grant-in-Aid for Encouragement of Young Medical Scientists.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Hiromasa Takaishi or Toshifumi Hibi.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Yamagishi, Y., Higuchi, H., Izumiya, M. et al. Gemcitabine as first-line chemotherapy in elderly patients with unresectable pancreatic carcinoma. J Gastroenterol 45, 1146–1154 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00535-010-0258-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00535-010-0258-9

Keywords

Navigation