Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Comparison of gastroesophageal reflux in 100 patients with or without prior gastroesophageal surgery

  • Original Article—Alimentary Tract
  • Published:
Journal of Gastroenterology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background and purpose

The role of duodenogastroesophageal reflux (DGER) in gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) remains controversial. Few studies of reflux have compared patients with an intact stomach to those without intact stomach after gastroesophageal surgery. This study aimed to investigate differences of the refluxate between patients with and without prior gastroesophageal surgery and to assess the role of DGER in GERD.

Methods

One hundred patients (34% with reflux symptoms) were divided into four groups: 23 with an intact stomach, and 27, 42, and 8 with esophagectomy followed by gastric tube reconstruction, distal gastrectomy, and total gastrectomy, respectively. Reflux symptoms were evaluated, and endoscopy and simultaneous 24-h monitoring of esophageal pH and bilirubin were performed.

Results

Of 44 patients with increased DGER but without increased acid reflux, three had severe reflux esophagitis and seven had Barrett’s esophagus. DGER was most frequent under weakly acidic conditions in the intact stomach, esophagectomy, and distal gastrectomy groups. Pure acid reflux and DGER at any pH were elevated in GERD patients with an intact stomach, while weakly acidic and alkaline DGER were elevated in GERD patients after gastrectomy. Esophagectomy patients had reflux with the combined characteristics of those in the intact stomach and gastrectomy groups. Weakly acidic or alkaline DGER was correlated with symptoms and esophageal mucosal changes in gastrectomy patients.

Conclusion

The refluxate causing GERD differed between patients with and without prior gastroesophageal surgery. Weakly acidic or alkaline DGER may cause both symptoms and esophageal mucosal damage.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Champion G, Richter JE, Vaezi MF, Singh S, Alexander R. Duodenogastroesophageal reflux: relationship to pH and importance in Barrett’s esophagus. Gastroenterology. 1994;107:747–54.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Kauer WK, Peters JH, DeMeester TR, Ireland AP, Bremner CG, Hagen JA. Mixed reflux of gastric and duodenal juices is more harmful to the esophagus than gastric juice alone. The need for surgical therapy re-emphasized. Ann Surg. 1995;222:525–31.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Vaezi MF, Richter JE. Role of acid and duodenogastroesophageal reflux in gastroesophageal reflux disease. Gastroenterology. 1996;111:1192–9.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Marshall RE, Anggiansah A, Owen WA, Owen WJ. Investigation of oesophageal reflux symptoms after gastric surgery with combined pH and bilirubin monitoring. Br J Surg. 1999;86:271–5.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Koek GH, Tack J, Sifrim D, Lerut T, Janssens J. The role of acid and duodenal gastroesophageal reflux in symptomatic GERD. Am J Gastroenterol. 2001;96:2033–40.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Osugi H, Higashino M, Kaseno S, Takada N, Takemura M, Ueno M, et al. Ambulatory intraesophageal bilirubin monitoring in Japanese patients with gastroesophageal reflux. J Gastroenterol. 2002;37:697–702.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Vaezi MF, Richter JE. Contribution of acid and duodenogastro-oesophageal reflux to oesophageal mucosal injury and symptoms in partial gastrectomy patients. Gut. 1997;41:297–302.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Yumiba T, Kawahara H, Nishikawa K, Inoue Y, Ito T, Matsuda H. Impact of esophageal bile exposure on the genesis of reflux esophagitis in the absence of gastric acid after total gastrectomy. Am J Gastroenterol. 2002;97:1647–52.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Öberg S, Johansson J, Wenner J, Walther B. Metaplastic columnar mucosa in the cervical esophagus after esophagectomy. Ann Surg. 2002;235:338–45.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Dresner SM, Griffin SM, Wayman J, Bennett MK, Hayes N, Raimes SA. Human model of duodenogastro-oesophageal reflux in the development of Barrett’s metaplasia. Br J Surg. 2003;90:1120–8.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. O’Riordan JM, Tucker ON, Byrne PJ, McDonald GS, Ravi N, Keeling PW, et al. Factors influencing the development of Barrett’s epithelium in the esophageal remnant postesophagectomy. Am J Gastroenterol. 2004;99:205–11.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Yuasa N, Sasaki E, Ikeyama T, Miyake H, Nimura Y. Acid and duodenogastroesophageal reflux after esophagectomy with gastric tube reconstruction. Am J Gastroenterol. 2005;100:1021–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Nehra D, Howell P, Williams CP, Pye JK, Beynon J. Toxic bile acids in gastro-oesophageal reflux disease: influence of gastric acidity. Gut. 1999;44:598–602.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Marshall RE, Anggiansah A, Owen WA, Owen WJ. Investigation of gastro-oesophageal reflux in patients with an intact stomach: is oesophageal bilirubin monitoring a useful addition to pH monitoring? Scand J Gastroenterol. 2000;35:904–9.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Armstrong D, Bennett JR, Blum AL, Dent J, De Dombal FT, Galmiche JP, et al. The endoscopic assessment of esophagitis: a progress report on observer agreement. Gastroenterology. 1996;111:85–92.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Noda T. Angioarchitectural study of esophageal varices. With special reference to variceal rupture. Virchows Arch A Pathol Anat Histopathol. 1984;404:381–92.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Vianna A, Hayes PC, Moscoso G, Driver M, Portmann B, Westaby D, et al. Normal venous circulation of the gastroesophageal junction. A route to understanding varices. Gastroenterology. 1987;93:876–89.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Hoshihara Y, Kogure T, Yamamoto T, Hashimoto M, Hoteya O. Endoscopic diagnosis of Barrett’s esophagus. Nippon Rinsho. 2005;63:1394–8. (in Japanese with English abstract).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Jamieson JR, Stein HJ, DeMeester TR, Bonavina L, Schwizer W, Hinder RA, et al. Ambulatory 24-h esophageal pH monitoring: normal values, optimal thresholds, specificity, sensitivity, and reproducibility. Am J Gastroenterol. 1992;87:1102–11.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Bechi P, Pucciani F, Baldini F, Cosi F, Falciai R, Mazzanti R, et al. Long-term ambulatory enterogastric reflux monitoring. Validation of a new fiberoptic technique. Dig Dis Sci. 1993;38:1297–306.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Kinoshita Y, Kawanami C, Kishi K, Nakata H, Seino Y, Chiba T. Helicobacter pylori independent chronological change in gastric acid secretion in the Japanese. Gut. 1997;41:452–8.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Iijima K, Ohara S, Koike T, Sekine H, Shimosegawa T. Gastric acid secretion of normal Japanese subjects in relation to Helicobacter pylori infection, aging, and gender. Scand J Gastroenterol. 2004;39:709–16.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Harmon JW, Johnson LF, Maydonovitch CL. Effects of acid and bile salts on the rabbit esophageal mucosa. Dig Dis Sci. 1981;26:65–72.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Kivilaakso E, Fromm D, Silen W. Effect of bile salts and related compounds on isolated esophageal mucosa. Surgery. 1980;87:280–5.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Tack J, Koek G, Demedts I, Sifrim D, Janssens J. Gastroesophageal reflux disease poorly responsive to single-dose proton pump inhibitors in patients without Barrett’s esophagus: acid reflux, bile reflux, or both? Am J Gastroenterol. 2004;99:981–8.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Westhoff BC, Weston A, Cherian R, Sharma P. Development of Barrett’s esophagus six months after total gastrectomy. Am J Gastroenterol. 2004;99:2271–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Peitz U, Vieth M, Ebert M, Kahl S, Schulz HU, Roessner A, et al. Small-bowel metaplasia arising in the remnant esophagus after esophagojejunostomy. a prospective study in patients with a history of total gastrectomy. Am J Gastroenterol. 2005;100:2062–70.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Fukuhara K, Osugi H, Takada N, Takemura M, Higashino M, Kinoshita H. Reconstructive procedure after distal gastrectomy for gastric cancer that best prevents duodenogastroesophageal reflux. World J Surg. 2002;26:1452–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Norihiro Yuasa.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Yuasa, N., Abe, T., Sasaki, E. et al. Comparison of gastroesophageal reflux in 100 patients with or without prior gastroesophageal surgery. J Gastroenterol 44, 650–658 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00535-009-0055-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00535-009-0055-5

Keywords

Navigation