Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Autonomic nervous function in upper gastrointestinal endoscopy: A prospective randomized comparison between transnasal and oral procedures

  • Published:
Journal of Gastroenterology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background. Transnasal esophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGD) using an ultrathin endoscope is less stressful to the cardiovascular system with less elevation of systolic blood pressure (BP) than oral procedures. To elucidate the mechanism of such beneficial cardiovascular responses, we performed a prospective patient-centered randomized study in which BP and pulse rate (P), as well as autonomic nervous functions, were estimated during transnasal EGD compared with those in oral procedures using the same ultrathin endoscope. Methods. The study involved 781 patients, among whom 55 and 56 cases were assigned to transnasal and oral EGD groups, respectively. The autonomic nervous responses were determined employing power spectral analysis (PSA) of heart-rate variations on electrocardiogram. PSA data were based on two peaks in lowfrequency (LF) and high-frequency (HF) ranges. HF power and the ratio of LF power/HF power represented parasympathetic and sympathetic nervous activities, respectively. Results. Our study confirmed the lesser elevation of BP and P in patients undergoing transnasal EGD than in those undergoing oral procedures. PSA revealed a lower increase in LH power/HF power in transnasal EGD than in oral EGD. However, both endoscopic procedures equally suppressed HF power. Significant correlations were found between the parameters of cardiovascular response (P and BP) and autonomic functions (LF power/HF power ratio and HF power). Conclusions. This is the first study demonstrating less sympathetic stimulation in patients undergoing transnasal EGD, leading to lesser elevation of BP and P.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Sharma VK, Nguyen CC, Crowell MD, Lieberman DA, de Garmo P, Fleischer DE. A national study of cardiopulmonary unplanned events after GI endoscopy. Gastrointest Endosc 2007;66:27–34.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Gandi S, Saidi F, Patel K, Johnstone B, Jaeger J, Shine D. Cardiovascular complications after GI endoscopy: occurrence and risks in a large hospital system. Gastrointest Endosc 2004;60:679–85.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Yazawa K, Adachi W, Koide N, Watanabe H, Koike S, Hanazaki K. Changes in cardiopulmonary parameters during upper gastrointestinal endoscopy in patients with heart disease: towards safer endoscopy. Endoscopy 2000;32:287–93.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Arrowsmith JB, Gerstman BB, Fleischer DE, Benjamin SB. Results from the American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy/US Food and Drug Administration collaborative study on complication rates and drug use during gastrointestinal endoscopy. Gastrointest Endosc 1991;37:421–7.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Saeian K. Unsedated transnasal endoscopy: a safe and less costly alternative. Curr Gastroenterol Rep 2002;4:213–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Dean R, Dua K, Massey B, Berger W, Hogan WJ, Shaker R. A comparative study of unsedated transnasal esophagogastroduodenoscopy and conventional EGD. Gastrointest Endosc 1996;44:422–4.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Dumortier J, Napoleon B, Hedelius F, Pellissier PE, Leprince E, Pujol B, et al. Unsedated transnasal EGD in daily practice: results with 1100 consecutive patients. Gastrointest Endosc 2003;57:198–204.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Preiss C, Charton JP, Schumacher B, Neuhaus H. A randomized trial of unsedated transnasal small-caliber esophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGD) versus peroral small-caliber EGD versus conventional EGD. Endoscopy 2003;35:641–6.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Yagi J, Adachi K, Arima N, Tanaka S, Ose T, Azumi T, et al. A prospective randomized comparative study on the safety and tolerability of transnasal esophagogastroduodenoscopy. Endoscopy 2005;37:1226–31.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Mori A, Fushimi N, Asano, T, Maruyama T, Ohashi N, Okumura S, et al. Cardiovascular tolerance in unsedated upper gastrointestinal endoscopy: prospective randomized comparison between transnasal and conventional oral procedures. Dig Endosc 2006;18:282–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Hayashi T, Nomura M, Honda H, Tezuka K, Torisu R, Takeuchi Y, et al. Evaluation of autonomic nervous function during upper gastrointestinal endoscopy using heart rate variability. J Gastroenterol 2000;35:815–23.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Saijyo T, Nomura M, Nakaya Y, Saito K, Kondo Y, Yukinaka M, et al. Assessment of autonomic nervous activity during gastrointestinal endoscopy: analysis of blood pressure variability by tonometry. J Gastroenterol Hepatol 1998;13:816–20.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Tezuka K, Nomura M, Saito K, Takeuchi Y, Torisu R, Yano M, et al. Changes in autonomic nervous activity during colonoscopy using spectral analysis of heart rate variability. Dig Endosc 2000;12:155–61.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Ochi Y, Nomura M, Okamura S, Yano M, Saito K, Nakaya Y, et al. Changes in autonomic nervous activity during endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography: a possible factor in cardiac complications. J Gastroenterol Hepatol 2002;17:1021–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Bradley C. Designing medical and educational intervention studies. Diabetes Care 1993;16:509–18.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Pagani M, Lombardi F, Guzzetti S, Rimoldi O, Furlan R, Pizzinelli P, et al. Power spectral analysis of heart rate and arterial pressure variability as a marker of sympatho-vagal interaction in man and conscious dog. Circ Res 1986;59:178–93.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Hayano J, Sakakibara Y, Yamada A, Yamada M, Mukai S, Fujinami T, et al. Accuracy of assessment of cardiac vagal tone by heart rate variability in normal subjects. Am J Cardiol 1991;67:199–204.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Task force of the European Society of Cardiology and the North American Society of Pacing and Electrophysiology. Heart rate variability. Standards of measurement, physiological interpretation, and clinical use. Circulation 1996;93:1043–65.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Lieberman DA, Wuerker CK, Katon RM. Cardiopulmonary risk of esophagogastroduodenoscopy. Role of endoscope diameter and systemic sedation. Gastroenterology 1985;88:468–72.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Shribman AJ, Smith G, Achola KJ. Cardiovascular and catecholamine responses to laryngoscopy with and without tracheal intubation. Br J Anaesth 1987;59:295–9.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. King BD, Harris LC, Greifenstein FE, Elder JD, Drippus RD. Reflex circulatory responses to direct laryngoscopy and tracheal intubation performed during general anesthesia. Anesthesiology 1951;12:556–66.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Myerburg RJ, Kessler KM, Mallon SM, Cox MM, deMarchena E, Interian A,et al. Life-threatening ventricular arrhythmias in patients with silent myocardial ischemia due to coronary artery spasm. N Engl J Med 1992;326:1451–5.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Lown B, Verrier RL. Neural activity and ventricular fibrillation. N Engl J Med 1976;294:1165–70.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Vanoli E, De Ferrari GM, Stramba-Badiale M, Hull SS, Foreman RD, Schwartz PJ. Vagal stimulation and prevention of sudden death in conscious dogs with a healed myocardial infarction. Circ Res 1991;68:1471–81.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Mori A, Asano T, Maruyama T, Ohashi N, Inoue H, Takekoshi S, et al. Transnasal ERCP/ENBD using an ultrathin esophagogastroduodenoscope. J Gastroenterol 2006;41:1237–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Mori, A., Ohashi, N., Tatebe, H. et al. Autonomic nervous function in upper gastrointestinal endoscopy: A prospective randomized comparison between transnasal and oral procedures. J Gastroenterol 43, 38–44 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00535-007-2124-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00535-007-2124-y

Key words

Navigation