Abstract
Background
To evaluate the pharmacodynamic effect, efficacy, and safety of omeprazole 10 mg and 20 mg once daily in patients with nonerosive reflux disease (NERD) in Japan.
Methods
A total of 37 patients were randomized to omeprazole 10 mg or omeprazole 20 mg once daily for 4 weeks. Eligible patients had a history of moderate-to-severe heartburn for 2 days or more per week during the last 1 month or longer prior to the study screening, grade M or grade N on Hoshihara's modification of the Los Angeles classification (i.e., no sign of mucosal break on esophagogastroduodenoscopy), and heartburn episodes for 2 days or more per week during the last week of the observation period while taking antacids. Ambulatory 24-h intraesophageal pH was monitored on the day before treatment and on the last day of treatment. The occurrence of a heartburn episode was recorded during pH monitoring. The primary endpoint was the change in the percentage of time with intraesophageal pH < 4 during the 24-h period before and after omeprazole treatment.
Results
Both omeprazole 10 mg and omeprazole 20 mg once daily reduced the percentage of time with intraesophageal pH < 4. The percentage reduction in time with intraesophageal pH < 4 after treatment with omeprazole was associated with a reduced number of heartburn episodes. Patients with grade M or grade N esophagus had similar pH profiles and NERD characteristics (e.g., pH holding time, symptom index) and comparable responses to omeprazole. No serious, drug-related adverse events were reported.
Conclusions
Omeprazole 10 mg or 20 mg reduces the percentage of time with intraesophageal pH < 4, is efficacious, and is well tolerated in patients with NERD in Japan, regardless of the patient's endoscopic classification.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Y Fujiwara K Higuchi Y Watanabe M Shiba T Watanabe K Tominaga et al. (2005) ArticleTitlePrevalence of gastroesophageal reflux disease and gastroesophageal reflux disease symptoms in Japan J Gastroenterol Hepatol 20 26–9 Occurrence Handle15610442 Occurrence Handle10.1111/j.1440-1746.2004.03521.x
Y Fujiwara K Higuchi H Nebiki S Chono H Uno K Kitada et al. (2005) ArticleTitleFamotidine vs. omeprazole: a prospective randomized multicentre trial to determine efficacy in non-erosive gastrooesophageal reflux disease Aliment Pharmacol Ther 21 IssueIDSuppl 2 10–8 Occurrence Handle15943841 Occurrence Handle1:CAS:528:DC%2BD2MXlvFShtb4%3D Occurrence Handle10.1111/j.1365-2036.2005.02468.x
D Armstrong JR Bennett AL Blum J Dent FT De Dombal JP Galmiche et al. (1996) ArticleTitleThe endoscopic assessment of esophagitis: a progress report on observer agreement Gastroenterology 111 85–92 Occurrence Handle8698230 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DyaK28zhsFGnug%3D%3D Occurrence Handle10.1053/gast.1996.v111.pm8698230
N Furukawa R Iwakiri T Koyama K Okamoto T Yoshida Y Kashiwagi et al. (1999) ArticleTitleProportion of reflux esophagitis in 6010 Japanese adults: prospective evaluation by endoscopy J Gastroenterol 34 441–4 Occurrence Handle10452674 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DyaK1MznvFOnsQ%3D%3D Occurrence Handle10.1007/s005350050293
M Inamori J Togawa H Nagase Y Abe T Umezawa A Nakajima et al. (2003) ArticleTitleClinical characteristics of Japanese reflux esophagitis patients as determined by Los Angeles classification J Gastroenterol Hepatol 18 172–6 Occurrence Handle12542602 Occurrence Handle10.1046/j.1440-1746.2003.02932.x
H Miwa T Minoo M Hojo R Yaginuma A Nagahara M Kawabe et al. (2004) ArticleTitleOesophageal hypersensitivity in Japanese patients with non-erosive gastro-oesophageal reflux diseases Aliment Pharmacol Ther 20 IssueIDSuppl 1 112–7 Occurrence Handle15298616 Occurrence Handle10.1111/j.1365-2036.2004.01990.x
K Okamoto R Iwakiri M Mori M Hara K Oda A Danjo et al. (2003) ArticleTitleClinical symptoms in endoscopic reflux esophagitis: evaluation in 8031 adult subjects Dig Dis Sci 48 2237–41 Occurrence Handle14714607 Occurrence Handle10.1023/B:DDAS.0000007857.15694.15
T Nakamura K Shirakawa H Masuyama H Sugaya H Hiraishi A Terano (2005) ArticleTitleMinimal change oesophagitis: a disease with characteristic differences to erosive oesophagitis Aliment Pharmacol Ther 21 IssueIDSuppl 2 19–26 Occurrence Handle15943842 Occurrence Handle10.1111/j.1365-2036.2005.02469.x
Y Hoshihara M Hashimoto (2000) ArticleTitleEndoscopic classification of reflux esophagitis Nippon Rinsho 58 1808–12 Occurrence Handle11004807 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DC%2BD3cvltVyruw%3D%3D
TL Venables RD Newland AC Patel J Hole C Wilcock ML Turbitt (1997) ArticleTitleOmeprazole 10 milligrams once daily, omeprazole 20 milligrams once daily, or ranitidine 150 milligrams twice daily, evaluated as initial therapy for the relief of symptoms of gastro-oesophageal reflux disease in general practice Scand J Gastroenterol 32 965–73 Occurrence Handle9361167 Occurrence Handle1:CAS:528:DyaK2sXmslOrt74%3D
R Carlsson J Dent R Watts S Riley R Sheikh J Hatlebakk et al. (1998) ArticleTitleGastro-oesophageal reflux disease in primary care: an international study of different treatment strategies with omeprazole. International GORD Study Group Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol 10 119–24 Occurrence Handle9581986 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DyaK1c3ktFWnsA%3D%3D
T Wada M Sasaki H Kataoka S Tanida K Itoh N Ogasawara et al. (2005) ArticleTitleEfficacy of famotidine and omeprazole in healing symptoms of non-erosive gastro-oesophageal reflux disease: randomized-controlled study of gastro-oesophageal reflux disease Aliment Pharmacol Ther 21 IssueIDSuppl 2 2–9 Occurrence Handle15943840 Occurrence Handle1:CAS:528:DC%2BD2MXlvFShtLc%3D Occurrence Handle10.1111/j.1365-2036.2005.02467.x
CG Streets TR DeMeester (2003) ArticleTitleAmbulatory 24-hour esophageal pH monitoring: why, when, and what to do J Clin Gastroenterol 37 14–22 Occurrence Handle12811203 Occurrence Handle10.1097/00004836-200307000-00007
PJ Kahrilas EM Quigley (1996) ArticleTitleClinical esophageal pH recording: a technical review for practice guideline development Gastroenterology 110 1982–96 Occurrence Handle8964428 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DyaK283jvFOisg%3D%3D Occurrence Handle10.1053/gast.1996.1101982
JR Jamieson HJ Stein TR DeMeester L Bonavina W Schwizer RA Hinder et al. (1992) ArticleTitleAmbulatory 24-h esophageal pH monitoring: normal values, optimal thresholds, specificity, sensitivity, and reproducibility Am J Gastroenterol 87 1102–11 Occurrence Handle1519566 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DyaK38zptFCgsg%3D%3D
NE Schindlbeck C Heinrich A Konig A Dendorfer F Pace SA Muller-Lissner (1987) ArticleTitleOptimal thresholds, sensitivity, and specificity of long-term pH-metry for the detection of gastroesophageal reflux disease Gastroenterology 93 85–90 Occurrence Handle3582918 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DyaL2s3hvFOnsA%3D%3D
M Robinson PN Maton ML Allen TJ Humphries D McIntosh AJ Cagliola et al. (1991) ArticleTitleEffect of different doses of omeprazole on 24-hour oesophageal acid exposure in patients with gastro-oesophageal reflux Aliment Pharmacol Ther 5 645–51 Occurrence Handle1782307 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DyaK387ksVygsA%3D%3D Occurrence Handle10.1111/j.1365-2036.1991.tb00532.x
M Ruth H Enbom L Lundell H Lonroth N Sandberg S Sandmark (1988) ArticleTitleThe effect of omeprazole or ranitidine treatment on 24-hour esophageal acidity in patients with reflux esophagitis Scand J Gastroenterol 23 1141–6 Occurrence Handle3073525 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DyaL1M3ktF2ntw%3D%3D
Y Yamashita Y Kinoshita K Chihara T Chiba (1994) ArticleTitleComparison of the effects between standard doses of H2-blocker (famotidine 20 mg b.d.) and proton pump inhibitor (omeprazole 20 mg o.d.) in the treatment of refractory reflux esophagitis by ambulatory 24-hr intra-gastroesophageal pH monitoring Nippon Shokakibyo Gakkai Zasshi 91 2166–73 Occurrence Handle7837683 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DyaK2M7jvFCqtg%3D%3D
EC Klinkenberg-Knol HP Festen SG Meuwissen (1988) ArticleTitleThe effects of omeprazole and ranitidine on 24-hour pH in the distal oesophagus of patients with reflux oesophagitis Aliment Pharmacol Ther 2 221–7 Occurrence Handle2979246 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DyaK38%2Fjt1egtQ%3D%3D Occurrence Handle10.1111/j.1365-2036.1988.tb00691.x
I Janczewska M Sagar S Sjostedt B Hammarlund M Iwarzon R Seensalu (1998) ArticleTitleComparison of the effect of lansoprazole and omeprazole on intragastric acidity and gastroesophageal reflux in patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease Scand J Gastroenterol 33 1239–43 Occurrence Handle9930385 Occurrence Handle1:CAS:528:DyaK1MXmvVWnsQ%3D%3D Occurrence Handle10.1080/00365529850172304
GJ Wiener JE Richter JB Copper WC Wu DO Castell (1988) ArticleTitleThe symptom index: a clinically important parameter of ambulatory 24-hour esophageal pH monitoring Am J Gastroenterol 83 358–61 Occurrence Handle3348191 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DyaL1c7mtV2qtQ%3D%3D
KD Lillemoe LF Johnson JW Harmon (1982) ArticleTitleRole of the components of the gastroduodenal contents in experimental acid esophagitis Surgery 92 276–84 Occurrence Handle6808683 Occurrence Handle1:CAS:528:DyaL38XlsValtb0%3D
T Lind T Havelund R Carlsson O Anker-Hansen H Glise H Hernqvist et al. (1997) ArticleTitleHeartburn without oesophagitis: efficacy of omeprazole therapy and features determining therapeutic response Scand J Gastroenterol 32 974–9 Occurrence Handle9361168 Occurrence Handle1:CAS:528:DyaK2sXmslOrt78%3D Occurrence Handle10.3109/00365529709011212
F Johnsson L Weywadt JH Solhaug H Hernqvist L Bengtsson (1998) ArticleTitleOne-week omeprazole treatment in the diagnosis of gastro-oesophageal reflux disease Scand J Gastroenterol 33 15–20 Occurrence Handle9489902 Occurrence Handle1:CAS:528:DyaK1cXhtFeitr8%3D Occurrence Handle10.1080/00365529850166149
R Fass JJ Ofman RE Sampliner L Camargo C Wendel MB Fennerty (2000) ArticleTitleThe omeprazole test is as sensitive as 24-h oesophageal pH monitoring in diagnosing gastro-oesophageal reflux disease in symptomatic patients with erosive oesophagitis Aliment Pharmacol Ther 14 389–96 Occurrence Handle10759617 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DC%2BD3c3it12qtw%3D%3D Occurrence Handle10.1046/j.1365-2036.2000.00733.x
M Cicala S Emerenziani R Caviglia MP Guarino P Vavassori M Ribolsi et al. (2003) ArticleTitleIntra-oesophageal distribution and perception of acid reflux in patients with non-erosive gastro-oesophageal reflux disease Aliment Pharmacol Ther 18 605–13 Occurrence Handle12969087 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DC%2BD3svivVGnsw%3D%3D Occurrence Handle10.1046/j.1365-2036.2003.01702.x
KC Trimble A Pryde RC Heading (1995) ArticleTitleLowered oesophageal sensory thresholds in patients with symptomatic but not excess gastro-oesophageal reflux: evidence for a spectrum of visceral sensitivity in GORD Gut 37 7–12 Occurrence Handle7672684 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DyaK2Mvgt1yisA%3D%3D
S Joelson IB Joelson P Lundborg A Walan MA Wallander (1992) ArticleTitleSafety experience from long-term treatment with omeprazole Digestion 51 IssueIDSuppl 1 93–101 Occurrence Handle1397750 Occurrence Handle10.1159/000200922
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Kinoshita, Y., Kobayashi, T., Kato, M. et al. The pharmacodynamic effect of omeprazole 10 mg and 20 mg once daily in patients with nonerosive reflux disease in Japan. J Gastroenterol 41, 554–561 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00535-006-1804-3
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00535-006-1804-3