Skip to main content
Log in

Diagnostic yield of endoscopic retrograde cholangiography and of EUS-guided fine needle aspiration sampling in gallbladder carcinomas

  • Original article
  • Published:
Journal of Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Sciences

Abstract

Background

Obtaining histological evidence of gallbladder carcinoma (GBC) is difficult due to its extraductal nature, and pathological confirmation remains challenging. We compared the diagnostic value and safety of endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration (EUS-FNA) with endoscopic retrograde cholangiography (ERC) in patients with suspected GBC.

Patients

Eighty-three patients with GBC were evaluated. Prior to definitive management, pathological evidence of GBC was obtained through either ERC cytopathologic sampling (n = 33), EUS-FNA (n = 24) or both (n = 26).

Results

Among the 83 patients, 59 (71.0%) with biliary obstruction were sampled using ERC with 47.4% (28/59) sensitivity. In 19 of the remaining 31 cases, EUS-FNA sampling had 100% diagnostic sensitivity. Likewise, 50 (60.2%) of the 83 patients with suspected GBC underwent EUS-FNA of regional lymph nodes or the gallbladder (GB) mass itself with 94.8% sensitivity. The overall diagnostic sensitivity rates of ERC and EUS-FNA were 47.4 and 96%, respectively (P < 0.001). Post-procedural complications were seen in 6.7% of the ERC group (4/59, all were mild pancreatitis), and in none of the EUS-FNA group (P = 0.10).

Conclusions

Gallbladder carcinoma sampling using ERC and EUS-FNA should be incorporated into the diagnostic workup of GB lesions as complementary tools, and EUS-FNA should be applied in the setting of failed or not indicated ERC.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Harewood G, Baron T, Stadheim L, Kipp B, Sebo T, Salomao D. Prospective, blinded assessment of factors influencing the accuracy of biliary cytology interpretation. Am J Gastroenterol. 2004;99(8):1464–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Fogel EL, Debellis M, McHenry L, Watkins JL, Chappo J, Cramer H, et al. Effectiveness of a new long cytology brush in the evaluation of malignant biliary obstruction: a prospective study. Gastrointest Endosc. 2006;63(1):71–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. de Bellis M, Sherman S, Fogel EL, Cramer H, Chappo J, McHenry L Jr, et al. Tissue sampling at ERCP in suspected malignant biliary strictures (Part 2). Gastrointest Endosc. 2002;56(5):720–30.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Rösch T, Hofrichter K, Frimberger E, Meining A, Born P, Weigert N, et al. ERCP or EUS for tissue diagnosis of biliary strictures? A prospective comparative study. Gastrointest Endosc. 2004;60(3):390–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Eloubeidi MA, Chen VK, Eltoum IA, Jhala D, Chhieng DC, Jhala N, et al. Endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration biopsy of patients with suspected pancreatic cancer: diagnostic accuracy and acute and 30-day complications. Am J Gastroenterol. 2003;98(12):2663–8.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Agarwal B, Abu-Hamda E, Molke KL, Correa AM, Ho L. Endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration and multidetector spiral CT in the diagnosis of pancreatic cancer. Am J Gastroenterol. 2004;99(5):844–50.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Oppong K, Raine D, Nayar M, Wadehra V, Ramakrishnan S, Charnley RM. EUS-FNA versus biliary brushings and assessment of simultaneous performance in jaundiced patients with suspected malignant obstruction. JOP J Pancreas (Online). 2010;11(6):560–7.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Fritscher-Ravens A, Broering D, Knoefel W, Rogiers X, Swain P, Thonke F, et al. EUS-guided fine-needle aspiration of suspected hilar cholangiocarcinoma in potentially operable patients with negative brush cytology. Am J Gastroenterol. 2004;99(1):45–51.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. DeWitt J, Misra V, LeBlanc J, McHenry L, Sherman S. EUS-guided FNA of proximal biliary strictures after negative ERCP brush cytology results. Gastrointest Endosc. 2006;64(3):325–33.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Lee J, Salem R, Aslanian H, Chacho M, Topazian M. Endoscopic ultrasound and fine-needle aspiration of unexplained bile duct strictures. Am J Gastroenterol. 2004;99(6):1069–73.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Jacobson B, Pitman M, Brugge W. EUS-guided FNA for the diagnosis of gallbladder masses. Gastrointest Endosc. 2003;57:251–4.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Meara R, Jhala D, Eloubeidi M, Eltoum I, Chhieng D, Crowe D, et al. Endoscopic ultrasound-guided FNA biopsy of bile duct and gallbladder: analysis of 53 cases. Cytopathology. 2006;17:42–9.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Varadarajulu S, Eloubeidi M. Endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration in the evaluation of gallbladder masses. Endoscopy. 2005;37:751–4.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Hijioka S, Mekky MA, Bhatia V, Sawaki A, Mizuno N, Hara K. Can EUS-guided FNA distinguish between gallbladder cancer and xanthogranulomatous cholecystitis? Gastrointest Endosc. 2010;72:622–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Baron TH, Lee JG, Wax TD, Schmitt CM, Cotton PB, Leung JWC. An in vitro, randomized, prospective study to maximize cellular yield during bile duct brush cytology. Gastrointest Endosc. 1994;40(2):146–9.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Yamao K, Sawaki A, Mizuno N, Shimizu Y, Yatabe Y, Koshikawa T. Endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration biopsy (EUS-FNAB): past, present, and future. J Gastroenterol. 2005;40:1013–23.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Yamao K, Mizuno N, Takagi T, Hara K. How I do it and when I use (and do not use) EUS-FNA. Gastrointest Endosc. 2009;69:134–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Uchiyama K, Ozawa S, Ueno M, Hayami S, Hirono S, Ina S, et al. Xanthogranulomatous cholecystitis: the use of preoperative CT findings to differentiate it from gallbladder carcinoma. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg. 2009;16:333–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Spinelli A, Schumacher G, Pascher A, Hanninen E, Abadi H, Benckert C, et al. Extended surgical resection for xanthogranulomatous cholecystitis mimicking advanced gallbladder carcinoma: a case report and review of literature. World J Gastroenterol. 2006;12:2293–6.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Enomoto T, Todoroki T, Koike N, Kawamoto T, Matsumoto H. Xanthogranulomatous cholecystitis mimicking stage IV gallbladder cancer. Hepatogastroenterology. 2003;50:1255–8.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Maitra A, Tascilar M, Hruban RH, Offerhaus GJ, Albores-Saavedra J. Small cell carcinoma of the gallbladder: a clinicopathologic, immunohistochemical, and molecular pathology study of 12 cases. Am J Surg Pathol. 2001;25(5):595.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Clark O, Benson A 3rd, Berlin J, Choti M, Doherty G, Engstrom P, et al. NCCN clinical practice guidelines in oncology: neuroendocrine tumors. J Natl Compr Cancer Netw. 2009;7(7):712.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Itoi T, Sofuni A, Itokawa F, Kurihara T, Tsuchiya T, Moriyasu F, et al. Preoperative diagnosis and management of thick-walled gallbladder based on bile cytology obtained by endoscopic transpapillary gallbladder drainage tube. Gastrointest Endosc. 2006;64(4):512–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Susumu Hijioka.

About this article

Cite this article

Hijioka, S., Hara, K., Mizuno, N. et al. Diagnostic yield of endoscopic retrograde cholangiography and of EUS-guided fine needle aspiration sampling in gallbladder carcinomas. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci 19, 650–655 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00534-011-0482-6

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00534-011-0482-6

Keywords

Navigation